1 / 30

Flow Correlations @ RHIC: “an abridged PHENIX view” Roy A. Lacey (for the PHENIX collaboration)

Flow Correlations @ RHIC: “an abridged PHENIX view” Roy A. Lacey (for the PHENIX collaboration) Chemistry Dept. Stony Brook University. Aim Give a survey of PHENIX Flow measurements Highlight several implications What theorist need to know. Coupling. Thursday – 5:20 PM.

kipling
Télécharger la présentation

Flow Correlations @ RHIC: “an abridged PHENIX view” Roy A. Lacey (for the PHENIX collaboration)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Flow Correlations @ RHIC: “an abridged PHENIX view” Roy A. Lacey (for the PHENIX collaboration) Chemistry Dept. Stony Brook University • Aim • Give a survey of PHENIX Flow measurements • Highlight several implications • What theorist need to know Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  2. Coupling Thursday – 5:20 PM Tuesday – 10:20 AM Now Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  3. Why study Flow? Flow measurements give access to the properties of the new state of matter recently discovered at RHIC • Access: • Direct  T, cs, η, ζ, etc • Indirect  constrains dynamics for determination • Crucial for Critical End Point (CEP) search Flow studies are indispensible Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  4. The Flow Probe Reaction plane Y X Z Hydrodynamic Primary Control Parameters Flow provides unparalleled access to the transport properties of the medium Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  5. How are transport coefficients obtained from flow data? • Issues • Data (method, role of non- flow?) • pre vs. post hadronic • contributions • Species dependence • Extraction procedure • Initial conditions (ε) • Fit constraints • etc Comparisons to viscous hydrodynamics calculation Hydrodynamically inspired fits to Data Critical path issues are common to all methodologies • There are known known's • There are known unknowns • There unknown unknowns • D. Rumsfeld Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  6. A known known - Flow measurements are robust BBC/MPC Central Arms PHENIX Preliminary RXN RXN BBC/MPC Event planes • No evidence for significant η-dependent non-flow contributions • Contributions from the ridge estimated to be small as well Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  7. A known known – Consistency of higher harmonics Central Arms RXN RXN BBC/MPC BBC/MPC PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary Consistent results for v4 / v2 2ratio using measurements with respect to the different event planes Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  8. Taranenko will discuss this in detail! A known known – agreement between RHIC measurements EP • Issues: • different experimental results • results from different methods • which data set to use ? • There is good agreement between experiments • Consideration of fluctuations important when comparing different methods The results from different methods should Not be used as a measure of systematic error! Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  9. A known known – Energy dependence of v2 ~ 50% increase from SPS to RHIC. Apparent saturation above 62.4 GeV Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  10. A known known – Flow scales PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary KET & nq (nq2)scaling validated for v2 as a function of centrality Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  11. A known known – Charm flows and scales PHENIX Final Run4 van Hees et al. PHENIX Preliminary Run7 Minimum bias Au+Au at √sNN = 200 GeV J/(ccbar) v2 still challenged by statistics • Strong coupling • η/s - estimate Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  12. A known known - universal scaling of harmonic flow at RHIC PHENIX Preliminary KET & nq (nq2)scaling validated for v2 (v4) Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  13. A known known - flow is partonic Demir et al η/s from hadronic phase is very large 10-12x(1/4π) No room for such values! Partonic flow dominates! Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  14. Hadronic flow at lower energies – v1 Bleicher et al PRL 85, 940 (2000) PRL 85, 940 (2000) Sideward's flow depend on particle species Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  15. A known known – Scaling breaks at high pT Hwa&Yang arXiv:0801.2183[nucl-th] • NCQ scaling is expected to break at intermediate pTif pions are mainly from recombination of TS partons but protons are mainly from TTS and TSS . Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  16. A Known Unknown – initial eccentricity  • Geometric fluctuations are very important – be skeptical of any claim that does not include them • eccentricity should be constrained Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  17. What do the fits and model comparisons tell us? Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  18. pions PHENIX preliminary data Estimates for η/s Chaudhuri Romatschke, Romatschke, & Luzum v2 pT(GeV/c) Calculations suggest small η/s value Viscosity required for KET scaling  Lower Limit ? Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  19. Estimates for η/s Teaney Extracted η/s is small Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  20. Estimates for η/s C. Gombeaud, J.-Y. Ollitrault arXiv:0907.4664, arXiv:0910.0392 Ideal hydro. + fluctuation + incomplete thermalization Ideal hydro. + fluctuation Ideal hydro. Fluctuations are very important Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  21. Estimates for η/s G. Denicol et al v2 pT Relaxation time limits η/s to small values Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  22. Knudsen number parameterization Strategy quantify the viscous corrections to hydrodynamics via a simple fitting procedure, to obtain K as a function of Npart Obtain from fits to data (viscous correction) Geometry (from model) With viscosity v2/ε Npart Ideal hydrodynamics Lattice EOS Obtain from fits to data (viscous correction) Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  23. Calibration of the method Methodology successfully proofed – very important Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  24. New constraints for η/s Lattice EOS arXiv:0905.4368 Geometric Viscous corrections Grow as : Not an intrinsic property (Teaney) T also obtained from the fit! Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  25. Summary • PHENIX measurements are robust, pervasive and rife with opportunity for more detailed extraction of transport coefficients. • Care is required for model comparisons. • Current estimates of η/s indicate a small value Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  26. STAR:PRL98(2007) 192301 Non-photonic electron flow PHENIX Preliminary

  27. U + U “tip-tip” collision collision along the longest axis “body-body” collision collision along the shortest axis

  28. v4/(v2)2 ratio for different particle species V4 = k(V2)2 where k is the same for different particle species 28

  29. High pT trigger Same-Side Jet x10 x20 Medium Response & Transport Coefficients QCD Sonic Boom Gives sound speed directly; Sets upper limit on viscosity. Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

  30. Simulated Deflected jet Simulated Mach Cone True 3PC jet correlations QCD Sonic Boom? Data Total 3PC jet correlations Data compatible with the presence of a away-side Mach Cone Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University; CATHIE-TECHQM Workshop, BNL USA, Dec 14-18th, 2009

More Related