1 / 16

Portals in Higher Ed.

Portals in Higher Ed. Dan Oberst, Princeton University. “ I don't know that I can define it, but I know one when I see it... ”. What is a Portal?. Apologies to Justice Stewart.

kipling
Télécharger la présentation

Portals in Higher Ed.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Portals in Higher Ed. Dan Oberst, Princeton University

  2. “I don't know that I can define it, but I know one when I see it...” What is a Portal? Apologies to Justice Stewart

  3. Enterprise portals provide a centralized, full-service starting point that allows companies to promote, deploy, and manage a broad range of applications, services, content and commerce offerings to web constituents. Epicentric White Paper

  4. EDUCAUSE Review Articles • July/August 2000 • Portals in Higher Education • Michael Looney and Peter Lyman • Institutional Information Portals • Carl Jacobson

  5. Information Evolution? • CWIS • Gopher • WWW • Push • Portals • ???

  6. Gartner: Portal Best Practices • Be sure business problem or goal is well understood • Understand requirements w/o over-analyzing them • Max Hype Shields: • Portals - second-most hyped item in all IT. • Don’t underestimate effort and cost of deployment G. Phifer COM-11-3816

  7. Questions to ask about portals: • Who is the portal for? • Students • Staff • Faculty • Associates (other researchers, govt, industry) • Alumni • Parents • Prospective Students • General Public

  8. Business Case/Support Model? • May vary by constituency • Initial costs • On going? • Self-funding? • Marketing expense?

  9. How does architecture fit in? • Hardware/OS Platform • Web Server • Application Server • Development Environment • Database engine • Authentication/Authorization • Legacy & New application Integration

  10. (Inevitable?) Vertical Portals • (CourseInfoPeopleSoft, MySAP, etc.). • “Tab” or link on enterprise portal? • Encompassed by the enterprise portal? • Replace/become the enterprise portal? • Compete with enterprise portal • fragmenting population, confusing users).

  11. Princeton Investigation • Two Pronged: • JA-SIG - (administrative applications portal) • http://asigdev.princeton.edu:82/portal/ • Broad revamp of web site: • Content Management (XML-based e.g. (worldweb.net) Expressroom I/O) • Personalized/customized Web Site based on role • Separate Outsourced effort for Alumni • PCI (Publishing Concepts, LLC)

  12. Evaluation • http://web.princeton.edu/sites/es/wsg/portal/ • Reviewed 29 vendors/portals • Narrow to 3 to evaluate: • Epicentric/GoCampus • Hummingbird • Sequoia

  13. Epicentric/GoCampus • Go Campus - Higher Ed Consortium/ASP • Community of interest/shared development • Hosted Service by GoCampus • Epicentric Portal Technology • WebLogic application server engine (JSP) • Content Building Blocks (“clips”/XML) • Application connectivity • GoCampus operation suspended

  14. Hummingbird • XML-based server rendered in HMTL • E-clips “webscrape” content • Tools to pipe E-clipse to customize content,pages • Text search, retrieval, spider engine • Role-based access model • Prototype pages up

  15. Sequoia • XML-based content access & delivery • plugins for HTML, POP • MS Message queues to manage requests • Scale through modularity • COM interfaces • Non-trivial implementation (infrastructure overhead)

  16. Evaluation Plan • Deploy simple portal • Demonstrate user access/customization • Implement business function • e.g. Employee benefits • Meet with constituent groups • Evaluate cost/benefit

More Related