1 / 15

Research design – formulating the research problem

Research design – formulating the research problem. Chapter 4 in Babbie & Mouton (2001) How to pose proper scientific questions The logic of the research process The research process O/head p. 98. Research design and research methodology.

kipp
Télécharger la présentation

Research design – formulating the research problem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Research design – formulating the research problem • Chapter 4 in Babbie & Mouton (2001) • How to pose proper scientific questions • The logic of the research process • The research process • O/head p. 98 Formulating the research question

  2. Research design and research methodology • Design – a plan or structured framework of how you intend to conduct the research • "A strategic framework for action that serves as a bridge between research questions and the execution or implementation of the research" • Methodology – refers to the methods, techniques, and procedures that are employed in implementing your research plan (design) Formulating the research question

  3. Purposes of research • Exploration • Description • Explanation Formulating the research question

  4. Exploration • To develop an initial, rough understanding of a phenomenon • Methods: • literature reviews • Interviews • case studies • key informants Formulating the research question

  5. Description • Precise measurement and reporting of the characteristics of the population or phenomenon • What is the case? • What is the nature of the relationship? • Methods: census, surveys, qualitative studies • NOTE: a sidestep to correlational studies Formulating the research question

  6. Correlation • See Chapter 2 in Weiten, for a quick review • Correlation: the degree of relationship between two variables, A and B Formulating the research question

  7. Direction of correlation: • When A has a high value, B has a high value; when A has a low value, B has a low value = a positive correlation. • E.g. the relationship between the amount smoked and the probability of heart disease • When A has a high value, B has a low value; when A has a low value, B has a high value = a negative correlation. • E.g.: Durkheim: the more socially integrated a society is, the lower the incidence of suicide in that society (p. 23 in Babbie and Mouton). Or: amount of daily exercise and probability of heart disease. • Also NO correlation = when two variables do not co-occur (see causation). E.g. studying Psychology and the probability of heart disease. Formulating the research question

  8. Explanation • Why “Is x the case?” or “Is x the relationship?” • Methods • experimental • NOTE: a sidestep to causation Formulating the research question

  9. Cause • Three requirements: • Cause precedes effect • A cause co-occurs with the effect • The third variable problem Formulating the research question

  10. Cause and correlation • Cause precedes effect • p. 83, Babbie and Mouton, smoking marijuana and academic performance • Co-occurrence • Correlational research only tells you two if variables happen together • A cause always co-occurs with an effect (Drinking a lot of alcohol) and (feeling light-headed and throwing up) co-occur because drinking alcohol causes drunkenness Formulating the research question

  11. Cause and correlation • BUT: • non-causally related events can also co-occur! • (The ANC wins the 2004 election) and (Dave obtains distinctions in his first semester courses in 2004) • ALSO: Very few perfect correlations in “the probabilistic world of social explanations” • Two non-causally related events/variables can co-occur because they are both related to something else – the “third variable” • p. 83, Babbie and Mouton, smoking marijuana, academic performance, and emotional problems • Does watching a lot of violent programmes on TV, or playing violent video games, cause children to behave more aggressively in preschool? Formulating the research question

  12. Causality: • A causes B if and only if • A exists then B exists • A does not exist, then B does not exist • Correlational studies test only “If A exists then B exists” • To test for causality, it is generally considered that we need a different type of design: an experimental design. To be discussed under “Types of design”. Formulating the research question

  13. Some decisions about designs • The purpose of your study (exploration, description, explanation) • This will impact on your decision about the type of design you will need • The unit of analysis • What are you talking about? • Individuals? Groups? Organizations? Social actions? • The time dimension • Is the study longitudinal (follow people over a long period of time) or cross-sectional (a snapshot in time)? Formulating the research question

  14. Some decisions about designs • Examples • See Weiten p. 434, on the long-term stability of temperament and personality: is a child's temperament at ten a predictor of his/her temperament at ten? • Those of you doing Developmental Psychology (PSY209F), look at Chapter 1 in Sigelman & Rider • Also distinguish between trend, cohort and panel studies • Trend studies: changes in a population over time • Cohort studies: changes in relatively specific sub-populations (cohorts) as they change over time • Panel studies: examine the same set of people over time. Formulating the research question

  15. Conclusion • These decisions affect the conclusions that can be drawn. Hence careful consideration of them – PRIOR to the study’s commencement. • We want our research to be VALID: truth, rationality, objectivity. A study has validity when it has the capacity to study what it aims to study – e.g. one that claims to study intelligence must have some measure of intelligence in it. • A study with poor validity is powerless. • Different types of research design have different threats to validity. Formulating the research question

More Related