1 / 17

Happier together : Social cohesion and subjective well- being

Happier together : Social cohesion and subjective well- being. Jan Delhey Jacobs University Bremen. Bertelsmann Cohesion Radar project www.social-cohesion.net. GLADS. Good Lives and Decent Societies i ndividual well-being societal well-being

kirra
Télécharger la présentation

Happier together : Social cohesion and subjective well- being

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Happiertogether:Social cohesion and subjective well-being Jan Delhey Jacobs University Bremen Bertelsmann Cohesion Radar project www.social-cohesion.net

  2. GLADS Good Lives and Decent Societies individual well-being societal well-being (“quality of life”) (“quality of society”) e.g. social cohesion

  3. Concernsaboutcohesion: • cohesion refers to a specific aspect of a society’s collective quality of life: the solidarity exhibited by the people of that society. In other words, cohesion describes the sense of community and the degree of brotherhood that exist. • Collective property, not an individual. • Social cohesion is believed to be challenged: growing ethno-cultural diversity; a widening gap between rich and poor; technological changes; welfare state retrenchments; Euro-crisis.... • A gap in the social reporting landscape (LegatumProsperity Index  8 dimensions, social capital; Index of Social Progress  10 dimensions, social chaos)

  4. Scope of thestudy • 34 countries • over 20 years (collapsedinto four time periods)

  5. Ourconcept of socialcohesion Overlapwithotherstudies, e.g. Chan (2006)

  6. Data sources: Survey data, expert ratings and processdata

  7. The international cohesionranking

  8. …in moredetail

  9. Cohesion:quitestableover time

  10. Cohesion strong in richsocieties

  11. Determinants of socialcohesion • National income (GDP p.c.) • Knowledge economy • Income inequality • (Unemployment rate) • Importance of religion • Postmaterialist value climate What’s not influencing cohesion: Ethnic fractionalization; migration (excpetion: migration from Eastern European) Masculine/feminine culture (Hofstede)

  12. The effect on SWB Normativeperspective vs. happinessperspective • The more – thebetter? Ormixedblessing (cf. darksides of socialcohesion) • Equallyimportantforrich and poorsocieties? • Equallyimportantformore/less vulnerable groups?

  13. LifeSathigherin cohesivesocieties

  14. Whichcomponentsof SWB areenhancedbycohesion? EU countries only; EQLS

  15. Cohesionmoreimportant in rich countries EU countries only; EQLS

  16. Cohesionisgoodfor all:less vs. more vulnerable groups EU countries only; EQLS

  17. In summary • Social cohesion is focusing on one important aspect of a “decent society”. • Social cohesion mainly depends on economic conditions, equality, and the value climate. • Citizens have higher SWB in more cohesive societies (Western Europe in particular). • Cohesion is good for all. • More important than GDP (GDP works through cohesion). We are happier together!

More Related