1 / 25

LABOR MOBILITY AND URBAN DENSITY Martin Andersson (JIBS, KTH) and Per Thulin (KTH)

LABOR MOBILITY AND URBAN DENSITY Martin Andersson (JIBS, KTH) and Per Thulin (KTH) DIME workshop on ” Regional innovation and growth: Theory, empirics and policy analysis ” Pecs, Hungary. Background and Motivation. Significant evidence of an “Urban Productivity Premium”

kishi
Télécharger la présentation

LABOR MOBILITY AND URBAN DENSITY Martin Andersson (JIBS, KTH) and Per Thulin (KTH)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LABOR MOBILITY AND URBAN DENSITY Martin Andersson (JIBS, KTH) and Per Thulin (KTH) DIME workshop on ”Regional innovation and growth: Theory, empirics and policy analysis” Pecs, Hungary

  2. Background and Motivation • Significant evidence of an “Urban Productivity Premium” • Workers earn more in densely populated areas • Glaeser and Maré (2001), Wheeler (2006), Yankow (2006), Ciccone and Hall (1996), Ciccone (2002), Rice et al. (2006), Brülhart and Mathys (2008) • agglomeration economies • productivity advantages brought about by agglomeration • While there is evidence of productivity advantages of dense areas, evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies is limited (Rosenthal and Strange 2004)

  3. Background and Motivation • This paper => Labor mobility • Often cited, but seldom measured and tested source of agglomeration economies • Related to 2 out of 3 families of micro-foundations • ‘Families’ of micro-foundations: (Duranton and Puga 2004): • (1) Sharing – indivisible investments, variety • (2) Learning – technology, formation of human capital, information flows • (3) Matching – firms and their inputs • Labor mobiility => related to matching and learning Main question: Does density spur labor mobility?

  4. The bulk of papers on agglomeration economies Current study

  5. How does density facilitate mobility? (1) • employees have high accessibility to a large set of potential employers, and vice versa. • reduced costs associated with labor market transactions • potential to change of job without change of residence • Cheaper search => more “job-hopping” in search for a match of high quality (2) • density may improve accessibility to information about potential jobs and employers. • Granovetter (1995): personal networks are an important source of information about job opportunities. • Such networks may be assumed to be wider and grow faster in regions with higher density of people (Fenney and Kohlhase 2008).

  6. Why is labor mobility a source of agglomeration economies? Learning • Labor mobility a vehicle for knowledge flows (Almeida and Kogut 1999, Oettl and Agrawal 2008, Agrawal et al. 2006) • Oettl and Agrawal (2008): • knowledge flows that are generated by labor mobility but cannot be priced on the market. • Social networks • Literature on Human Capital Externalities (Moretti 2004, Lucas 1988, Rauch 1993)

  7. Why is labor mobility a source of agglomeration economies? The matching argument • Quality of the match between employer and employee is uncertain and can only be evaluated ex post. • match quality is an ‘experience good’ (Farber 1994, Topel and Ward 1992) • Models of match quality and the thickness of local labor markets (Helsley and Strange 1990, Kim 1987, 1990) • expected quality of a match between employer and employee higher in thick markets • when more employers and employees are attracted to an agglomeration, the expected match quality increase for all actors in the agglomeration.

  8. Why is labor mobility a source of agglomeration economies? Note • Effective matching: higher average quality of match may imply lower mobility in dense regions • Bleakley and Lin (2007): • average labor mobility is lower in denser regions. • subsample of young individuals => labor mobility is higher in more densely populated areas. • density and search costs: less time and less costly to find new relevant jobs in denser areas with thicker labor markets • workers are more likely to search for new jobs in denser regions and they do so early in their careers to maximize their work life income. • Our “conclusion”: density spurs mobility => relevant to split sample by age cohorts

  9. DATA • Matched employer-employee dataset 1987-2005 • All employed individuals in private firms • About 1,4 million individuals per year • Mobility indicator: • employed individuals that switch employer (firm) between two years • a job switcher is defined as an individual who is employed both year t-1 and t and is working in a new firm and a new establishment year t as compared to t-1.

  10. General mobility in Sweden

  11. General mobility in Sweden

  12. General mobility in Sweden

  13. General mobility in Sweden

  14. DATA • Prime interest on the influence of density on the rate of intra-regional inter-firm labor mobility • intra-regional job switching accounts for about 90 % of all job switching • 2 measures of density: • Employment per square kilometer: • accessibility measure which accounts for the quality of transport infrastructure through travel-time distance decay extraregional intraregional

  15. DATA • Regions • 72 functional regions in Sweden • identified based on commuting patterns

  16. Mobility across regions

  17. Does density spur mobility? • Selection issue: • Higher mobility may be due to that inhabitants and firms in dense regions are a ‘select’ group (education, sector, gender, experience, etc.) • Need to control for employer and employee characteristics • Probit model Individual characteristics Regional characteristics Firm characteristics

  18. Variables of interest: density Controls • Individual characteristics • Age (and age squared) • Sex • Tenure • Education (7 categories) • Firm characteristics • Size (dummy variables) • Declining employment • Productivity (value-added per employee) • Region, time and sector dummies and Stockholm dummy

  19. We include density, density squared and the accessibility variables • We split the sample according to: • Age of individual (< 30 and 30 +) • Education categories • long university education (at least 3 years) • PhD • Other • Clustered standard errors at the individual level • Time period: 1997-2005

  20. Conclusions • Labor mobility is positively associated with density • Result is robust to across age cohorts and education categories • Higher mobility appears as a likely source of agglomeration economies (matching, learning)

  21. Conclusions • Labor mobility inherently influenced by commuting time distances • Improved transportation infrastructure => regional enlargement and increased density (choice set of employers increases for a given place of residence) => productivity effects (matching and learning) • Rice et al. (2006): positive relationship between ‘economic mass’ and productivity among regions in the UK. • doubling of the population in areas within short time distances to a region, such that accessibility to economic mass increase, is associated with 3.5 percent higher productivity in the region. • positive effect ceases to be important when travel time distances increase over 80 minutes. • around 60 minutes critical time distance span for commuting (Johansson et al. 2002) • effects are reduced when the time distances exceed those that normally define a functional region, i.e. a local labor market region. • suggest that the labor market is an important part of agglomeration economies. • provides some understanding of distance decay • transportation infrastructure investments and productivity

More Related