1 / 4

Enhancing Evaluation Quality Standards: Review, Key Successes, Challenges & Next Steps

Review main outcomes of day 1 discussions, focusing on the usefulness of EQS language, criteria matrix, flexibility, and weaknesses. Key challenges include raising awareness, clarifying purpose, building capacity, and promoting EQS. Expectations include aligning with Paris Declaration, emphasizing partnership, capacity building, and dissemination. Preparation for day 2 aims to address improvements and next steps to enhance the quality of evaluation standards.

kitra-wells
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Evaluation Quality Standards: Review, Key Successes, Challenges & Next Steps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session 1 Overview of main issues from day 1 Revue des principaux enjeux Two objectives: - To make an overview of our fruitful discussions of day 1 - To prepare our task of day 2 in terms of improveme nt & nextsteps

  2. Key successes EQS very useful, EQS language clear for a broader audience. Note a book but a clear and synthetic concept note EQS to be used by operational staff to prepare the ToR; improve the comprehension of the evaluation process ‘matrix’ of criteria against which reports assessed: * it makes the reports more reliable * capitalization in terms of quality of the consultants’ work * professionalization (how an evaluation is made) EQS allow for flexibility and innovation (more guidelines than a strict universal application which would answer all the questions)

  3. Limits and weaknesses • Different implementations amongst stakeholders (donors; partnercountries/ between donors/ HQs vs fields) • Even if synthetic and clear terms, certain qualitative and quantitative terms need definition • Some subheadings are numerous; should focus on crucial elemets • Lack of training; need of capacity building

  4. Key challenges & excpectations • Increase awareness amongst stakeholders (in the ground and for partner countries) • Clarify purpose and use of EQS • To take more into account principles elaborated in the Paris Declaration/AAA • From the meta evaluation prospective, could contain a set of indicators and rating criteria • Emphasize partnership with partner countries\ • Emphasize capacity building • Better promotion and awareness and dissemination of EQS

More Related