1 / 16

Punishing Assassins: The UN Security Council’s Criminal Tribunal for Lebanon

Punishing Assassins: The UN Security Council’s Criminal Tribunal for Lebanon. Sarah Williams Durham University. Overview. Background Establishment of the STL Key features Legal Basis Legal Issues: immunity, cooperation, primacy. Background (1). Political tension during 2004/05

kitty
Télécharger la présentation

Punishing Assassins: The UN Security Council’s Criminal Tribunal for Lebanon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Punishing Assassins: The UN Security Council’s Criminal Tribunal for Lebanon Sarah Williams Durham University

  2. Overview • Background • Establishment of the STL • Key features • Legal Basis • Legal Issues: immunity, cooperation, primacy

  3. Background (1) • Political tension during 2004/05 • Assassination of Hariri in Feb 2005 • Establishment of the UNIIIC • Resolution 1595 • Resolution 1636 • Further assassinations and bombings in 2005

  4. Background (2) • Request from Lebanon in December 2005 • Resolution 1644 • Council endorses report attaching draft agreement and statute • Agreement signed by UN and GoL in early 2007 • Lebanon requests unilateral establishment

  5. Background (3) • Resolution 1757, 30 May 2007 • Assassination = threat to international peace and security • Chapter VII resolution • Agreement to enter into force on 10 June 2007, unless GoL notifies Council that agreement has been ratified • Provisions re headquarters agreement and funding • Agreement not ratified, entered into force on 10 June 2007

  6. Key features (1): Structure • Pre-trial judge, Trial Chamber, Appeals Chamber, with international judges • International prosecutor, national deputy • International registrar • Defence office

  7. Key features (2): Funding and location • Funding • 51% from voluntary contributions and 49% from GoL • Phased introduction • Location • To sit outside Lebanon due to security concerns • Agreement concluded with the Netherlands to host the STL in The Hague • Office in Lebanon • Management Committee

  8. Key features (3): Jurisdiction • Temporal • Personal • Territorial • Subject matter • Domestic crimes only

  9. Key features (5): Procedural aspects • Draws on civil law traditions • Designed to use the material gathered by the UNIIIC, practical and legal issues • Trials in absentia • Provisions on rights of victims • No death penalty

  10. Legal basis (1) • Originally intended to be a treaty-based court, like the SCSL • What is the effect of Resolution 1757? • Two possibilities

  11. Legal basis (2) • Option One: STL remains a treaty-based tribunal • BUT: • Article 2(7) limitation • Implications for the law of treaties • Implications for the powers / validity of the Security Council

  12. Legal basis (3) • Option Two: STL established by Chapter VII as a ‘Chapter VII’ tribunal • Language of Resolution 1757 • Finding as to TIPS • BUT: • First hybrid to be established by Chapter VII • Valid exercise of Council’s powers? • Different to ICTY/R? • Preferable to option 1?

  13. Legal Issues (1) • Cooperation • Agreement contains binding obligations for Lebanon • Resolution 1757 silent as to obligations for other states • Existing Council resolutions (1373; 1566) • Terrorism conventions; other cooperation / MLA agreements • Future Council resolutions

  14. Legal Issues (2) • Immunity • No provision in statute • Does international law recognise immunity for terrorism crimes? • Can terrorism be an official act? • International tribunal – legal basis relevant to immunity? • Is a specific Council resolution removing immunity required?

  15. Legal Issues (3) • Primacy • Agreement confers primacy in respect of courts in Lebanon • No provision regards courts of other states • Possibility of trials in Syria – terrorism conventions only oblige to extradite or prosecute

  16. Future • Role of STL as part of overall strategy in the region • Risk of destabilising Syria? • Political will to enable STL to perform its mandate? • Future tribunals for political assassinations • ICC • Pakistan and East Timor?

More Related