1 / 13

Addressing Variability in Mercury Stack Emissions

Addressing Variability in Mercury Stack Emissions. MACT Working Meeting Washington, DC December 18, 2001. Method of Analysis. Builds on EPRI’s analysis of the Part III (stack) mercury ICR data. Regression based - uses chlorine in coal as primary explanatory variable.

kobe
Télécharger la présentation

Addressing Variability in Mercury Stack Emissions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Addressing Variability in Mercury Stack Emissions MACT Working Meeting Washington, DC December 18, 2001

  2. Method of Analysis • Builds on EPRI’s analysis of the Part III (stack) mercury ICR data. • Regression based - uses chlorine in coal as primary explanatory variable. • Makes use of the Part II (coal) ICR data.

  3. ICR Part II Coal Data Hg, Cl, S EPRI ICR Report Equations Predicted Hg Emissions ICR Part III Test Data, % removal

  4. Computational Steps • Using the appropriate EPRI regression model, compute a Hg emission factor for each Part II coal analysis. • Rank order the factors in ascending order. • Compute percent  each given value and plot results.

  5. Regression Model -Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter • Percent mercury removed is given by: %R = 0.2854*Ln(Cl2) - 1.1302 Where: %R = percent of mercury removed relative to that contained in the coal Cl2 = concentration of chlorine in coal.

  6. Regression Model -Fabric Filter • Percent mercury removal is given by: %R = 0.1816*Ln(Cl2) - 0.4287 Where: %R = percent of mercury removed relative to coal concentration Cl2 = concentration of chlorine in coal.

  7. Limitations and Observations • The regression model is not a perfect fit. • Quantity of data is uneven (e.g., 418 samples for Sammis and 41 for Mecklenburg). • However, much consistency among the sites (i.e., the emission rate that can be achieved 90% of the time is much higher than the one that can be achieved 50% of the time).

More Related