1 / 17

Workshop on e-submissions in the veterinary sector

Workshop on e-submissions in the veterinary sector. A proposal for electronic submission for veterinary medicines. Neil Paterson, David Lewsey and Alex Tait Veterinary Medicines Directorate, UK. Outline of presentation. Why electronic submissions Proposals for veterinary e-submissions

koko
Télécharger la présentation

Workshop on e-submissions in the veterinary sector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop on e-submissions in the veterinary sector A proposal for electronic submission for veterinary medicines Neil Paterson, David Lewsey and Alex Tait Veterinary Medicines Directorate, UK

  2. Outline of presentation • Why electronic submissions • Proposals for veterinary e-submissions • using bespoke software • using ‘standard’ software • Conclusions • Next steps

  3. Why electronic submissions • Industry request to HMA • Benefit to both regulators and industry • reduction of administrative burden (paper) • reduction of storage space • facilitation of assessment and review process • product lifecycle management • Accept e-submission by 1 Jan 2010

  4. VMD proposal for e-submissions • Based on common sense • Simple system based around way things work now • Builds on specification agreed by industry and regulators • Suitable for companies of all sizes

  5. E-submission using bespoke software • For reviewers based on EURS is Yours • Basic structure based on NTA (eNTA) • Natural evolution from paper to electronic format • Lifecycle management built in • Granularity • only 3 levels

  6. E-submission using bespoke software • eNTA structure • Example from Part III of dossier for a pharmaceutical product

  7. E-submission using ‘standard’ software • An electronic submission but not eNTA • A VNeeS based on an agreed standard • Structure still in line with NTA • Lifecycle management as for paper • Granularity • 2 levels

  8. E-submission using ‘standard’ software • NTA structure • Same example from Part III of dossier for a pharmaceutical product

  9. VNeeS • Advantages • same as already doing with paper • an interpretation of the already agreed specification for electronic dossiers • potential for import into EURS is Yours • simple structure • For example

  10. VNeeS requirements

  11. Conclusions • A single EU solution to e-submissions is needed • Can be used by all • Natural evolution from paper • Adaptability • Choice and flexibility • VMD believe it will work

  12. Next steps • Breakout sessions • Harmonisation of requirements • Validation criteria • Previous experience of e-submissions • Assistance to industry (e.g. SMEs)

  13. Next steps • Early decision – end May? • VMD willing to discuss with all • VMD will begin to draft a guidance for VNeeS

  14. The Future • Agreement now does not mean no changes • Systems can and probably will evolve over time • The proposal is the roadmap

  15. Have to be ready on 1 January 2010 Thank you for your attention

More Related