1 / 18

The effect of Next - Generation Sequencing technology on complex trait research

The effect of Next - Generation Sequencing technology on complex trait research. Challenge analysis. Presented by December 10, 2013. Ladang Auxane Mombaerts Laurent Uyttendaele Vincent. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction Challenge analysis

kolina
Télécharger la présentation

The effect of Next - Generation Sequencing technology on complex trait research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The effect of Next-GenerationSequencingtechnology on complex trait research Challenge analysis Presentedby December 10, 2013 Ladang Auxane Mombaerts Laurent UyttendaeleVincent University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, Kyrill Bessonov

  2. TABLE OF CONTENTS • Introduction • Challenge analysis • Optimizingparameters for study design • Storing and handling data • Mapping and aligning • Variant calling • Analyzinglowfrequency and rare variants • Applications • Discussion • Conclusion University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, Kyrill Bessonov

  3. INTRODUCTION WhatisNext-GenerationSequencing (NGS) ? High throughput Low-cost Applications From 1970 untilnow 3 F. Sanger University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  4. Three mains parameters: High cost-to-data. Only parts of thegenome? Power based on depth of coverage. Sample selection. CHALLENGE ANALYSIS 4 • 1. Optimizing parameters for study design University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  5. CHALLENGE ANALYSIS • Storing and handling data University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  6. CHALLENGE ANALYSIS University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  7. CHALLENGE ANALYSIS • 3. Mapping and aligningalgorithms University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  8. CHALLENGE ANALYSIS University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  9. CHALLENGE ANALYSIS • 4. Variant calling Distinguish true variant from sequencing or mapping errors → Decrease the number of false positive SNP-calls University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  10. CHALLENGE ANALYSIS University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  11. CHALLENGE ANALYSIS • 5. Analyzinglowfrequency and rare variants May be a painfulstep ! University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  12. APPLICATIONS The number of scientific publications has exploded ! University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  13. DISCUSSION Development of new study design • Development of more effective methods to distinguish errors from low frequency & rare variants • Development of the most appropriate strategy to identify one disease. University of Liège University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, Kyrill Bessonov

  14. DISCUSSION Cost-benefit analysis Whole genome sequencing is unlikely to be cost effective as it still presents huge challenges. → coupling a reduction of the costs with an increase of the efficiency and the accuracy. → make NGS platforms marketable, competitive and usable for clinical applications. University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  15. DISCUSSION Validation analysis Standards for NGS clinical genomics are required, for instance to validate the test accuracy. → important downstream impact on the patient diagnostic and management. University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  16. DISCUSSION Currentknowledge and research • Lack of knowledge • in what a SNP implies • in how we detect interaction between genes • in which influence gene expression has • in which interpretation must be given to the genome variance … The more we make tests,the more knowledge we get,the more associations between phenotype and genome we can do. University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  17. Conclusion University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

  18. REFERENCES A G Day-Williams, E Zeggini, The effect of Next-Generation Sequencing technology on complex trait research, Eur J Clin Invest 2011, Vol 41 : 561-567. http://videos.rennes.inria.fr/genopole/GenOuest-2010/, [online on 7th December 2013] http://www.qiagen.com/products/applications/next-generation-sequencing/#Dataanalysis, [online on 9th December 2013] Figures http://www.labtimes.org/labtimes/method/methods/2010_01.lasso http://nextgenseek.com/2012/01/illumina-launches-a-new-faster-sequencer-hiseq-2500/ http://www.nucleics.com/DNA_sequencing_support/DNA-sequencing-dye-blobs.html http://videos.rennes.inria.fr/genopole/GenOuest-2010/peterlongo_plateforme_2010_10_26.pdf http://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/tag/illumina/ http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/understandingcancer/geneticvariation/page40 University of Liège GBIO0009-1 : Krystel Van Steen, KyrillBessonov

More Related