1 / 12

Enhancing Scientific Collaboration through Open Access and Self-Archiving

This presentation by Eric T. Meyer at the Higher Education Academy outlines the growing trend of collaborative research in science, highlighting how teams enhance knowledge production. It discusses the importance of open access and self-archiving as vital tools for increasing the visibility and impact of scholarly work. The talk references significant studies that demonstrate the correlation between open access publishing and citation advantages, as well as the economic implications of alternative publishing models.

kolya
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Scientific Collaboration through Open Access and Self-Archiving

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Scientific collaboration, publication, open access and self-archiving for impact Eric T. Meyer Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Presented at Higher Education Academy, Birmingham, 28 April 2010

  2. Why is science and research growing more collaborative?

  3. The Growth of Teams Source: S. Wuchty et al., (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science 316, 1036 -1039.

  4. Source: Meyer & Schroeder (2009). The World Wide Web of Research and Access to Knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management Research and Practice 7 (3):218-233.

  5. Open Science / Science 2.0

  6. What about open access, self-archiving, and other ways of making one’s work available?

  7. Open access Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Brody, T., Carr, L., et al. Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. PLOS ONE. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0361 Houghton, J., & Oppenheim, C. (2010). The economic implications of alternative publishing models. Prometheus, 28(1), 41-54. Swan, A. (2010) The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Technical Report, School of Electronics & Computer Science, University of Southampton. http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18516/

  8. Disciplinary differences Source: Schroeder, R., Meyer, E.T. (2009). Gauging the Impact of e-Research in the Social Sciences. Paper presented at the 104th American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, August 8-11, San Francisco, California.

  9. Source: Meyer, E.T., Schroeder, R. (2009). Untangling the Web of e-Research: Towards a Sociology of Online Knowledge. Journal of Informetrics 3(3):246-260

  10. http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/

  11. Impact MeasuresSee TIDSR Toolkit at http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/tidsr/ Quantitative Measures • Webometrics • Analytics • Log file analysis • Scientometrics / bibliometrics • Content analysis of media coverage Qualitative Measures • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies) • Resource surveys • User feedback analysis • Focus groups • Questionnaires

  12. Oxford Internet InstituteUniversity of Oxford Eric T. Meyereric.meyer@oii.ox.ac.ukhttp://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/meyer Oxford e-Social Science Project

More Related