1 / 36

Tailoring Middleware

MIDDLEWARE SYSTEMS. RESEARCH GROUP. Tailoring Middleware. Hans-Arno Jacobsen Bell University Laboratory Chair in Software Middleware Systems Research Group University of Toronto. Joint work with Charles Zhang & Michael Gong. Agenda. Crosscutting concerns in middleware

korbin
Télécharger la présentation

Tailoring Middleware

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MIDDLEWARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH GROUP Tailoring Middleware Hans-Arno Jacobsen Bell University Laboratory Chair in Software Middleware Systems Research Group University of Toronto Joint work with Charles Zhang & Michael Gong Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  2. Agenda • Crosscutting concerns in middleware • The JiM approach: Just-in-time Middleware • ACC for boosting modularity in C-based systems Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  3. account.withdraw(100) Network Middleware is naturally layered! Begin transaction: Check-balance Withdraw End transaction Account Credit Loan Stub Generic Request Message Object Adapter Multiplexing Messaging Layer Application Frame Transport Layer OS Network Layer Network packets Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  4. Non-modular interactions Normal method invocations Reflective programming Asynch call Stub Object Adaptor Same host optimization Generic Request Message Messaging Layer Application frames Transport Layer OS Network Layer Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  5. Object/Procedures Application Adaptation Requests Problem: Implicit interactions in code public Downcall createPIDIIDowncall(String op, boolean resp, … ) throws FailureException { com.ooc.OCI.ProfileInfoHolder profile = new com.ooc.OCI.ProfileInfoHolder(); Client client = getClientProfilePair(profile); Assert._OB_assert(client != null); if(!policies_.interceptor) return new Downcall(orbInstance_, client, profile.value, policies_, op, resp); PIManager piManager = orbInstance_.getPIManager(); if(piManager.haveClientInterceptors()){ return new PIDIIDowncall(orbInstance_, client, profile.value, policies_, op, resp, IOR_, origIOR_, piManager, args, result, exceptions); } else{ return new Downcall(orbInstance_, client, profile.value, policies_, op, resp); } } DII PI Asyn Validation Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  6. Dynamic request handling in ORBacus red shows lines of code that handle dynamic request not in just one place not even in a small number of places Problem: Non-modular features Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  7. Problem: Losing modularity is harmful • Code is hard to understand, maintain & change • Runtime overhead • Evolution barrier with respect to infrastructure innovations Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  8. How real is this problem? • Quantification of contextual interactions (AOSD’03 & IEEE Trans. Parallel & Distributed Systems) • Three independent implementations of the same middleware specification • Moderate sizes (1500 – 1800 Java classes) • Different implementation styles • Six features: • Reflective programming model, runtime reflection, … • Over 50% of classes interact with 1 out 6 features. • Over 10% of classes interact with 3 or more features • Middleware architectures suffer from non-modularity Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  9. Mining non-modular features (AOSD’03, AOSD’07) Features Users Restructure legacy systems (OOPSLA’04) Construct new systems (Middleware’05) Usage-aware synthesis (AOSD’05) Context Research program • Aspe • SE methods for improving the • Mining of non-modularized features • Separation of tangled features • Adaptive architecture • Future work Concurrency Aspect Library (ECOOP’08) Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  10. JiM: Just-in-time Middleware & Abacus (AOSD’05)

  11. Pre-postulated middleware architecture • Pre-postulated architecture: middleware platforms of which the architectural composition happens before that of its applications (traditional approach). • Problem: • Imperative “domainization”: middleware architectures conceived and designed based on “domain” assumptions. • Difficulty in cross-domain re-use: middleware built for one domain cannot readily and transparently fit another. • Pre-postulated customization: middleware customization is designed independent of applications. Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  12. Mobile Desktop Embedded Server Domain pre-postulation: example • Middleware functionality • Target platforms • Middleware family • Enterprise / Desktop / Micro / Embedded / …. (The list goes on… …) remote invocation interface account{ account withdraw(...) } Teller network Account amount = 1000; account.withdraw(amount); Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  13. B B B N A A A A M N M C Pre-postulated product families • Where do I belong in the family? • What about feature N? MiddlewareX UserY My cell-phone app requires messaging passing of integers and file transfer. which one? Regular Mobile Enterprise A: Messaging passing, B: Integer C: String M: File transfer N: security UserY OK, I am developing a cell-phone app, but I don’t really need file transfer Mobile Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  14. Pre-postulated customization • Costs associated with middleware features. (IDL Keywords). • 217 possible usages. • A application most likely only uses a subset. • Challenges: • Difficult to pre-postulate the specific subset for every given application. • Complex to use if user needs to manually determine the customized version. Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  15. The JiM approach • Post-postulated architecture: Middleware of which the architectural composition happens after that of its applications. • Goal: A given application and its domain imperatively and transparently determine the middleware composition. Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  16. Middleware user applications B A N Tailored middleware instance JiM customization process JiM customization stages Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  17. JiM customization participants Middleware Vendor (Libraries/Dependencies) Middleware User (Declarations/Source code) Middleware Deployer (Contextual Constraints) Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  18. Abacus: A refactoring-based JiM implementation • Aspect-oriented ORBacus isour long-term refactoring of ORBacus, an industry-strength, Java-based CORBA implementation. • Highly modular: Comprised of 26 features implemented as aspects. • Capable of automatic customization for applications ranging from embedded, to desktop, and to enterprise environments. Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  19. Core requires either ‘synchrony’ or ‘asynchrony’ IR requires typecode with DII or DSI Abacus: Features and dependencies • Aspectual features: • Feature dependency specifications: Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  20. Abacus: Inference tree and pruning with cost functions • Initial selections: IR and Any (Core, mandatory) • Objective: Small bytecode size (sync, any, wstring , IR, DII, pecode) (sync, any,,wstring) (sync, any, wstring, IR, DSI, Typecode) (sync) (sync, any, ulonglong, IR, DII, Typecode) (sync, any, ulonglong) (sync, any, ulonglong, IR, DSI, Typecode) Core = sync+async any = wstring+ulonglong IR = (DSI+DII)*Typecode ( ) (async, any, ulonglong, IR, DII, Typecode) (async, any, ulonglong) (async, any, ulonglong, IR, DSI, Typecode) (async) (async, any, wstring, IR, DII, Typecode) (async, any, wstring) (async, any, wstring, IR, DSI, Typecode) Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  21. Object serialization / user garbage collection not allowed Abacus: Constraints • Indicates disallowed feature selections under specific conditions. • Invoked during the inference process to simplify the inference path. • Abacus constraints example: j2me { resource = ! valuetype * ! finalize; precision = ! double * ! fixed; infrastructure = ! applet; } Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  22. “double” interacts with “any” and “valuetype”, check if they are included. Abacus: Synthesis • Class schema: • Proper organization of aspect code space • Separation of implementation and interaction • Convolution descriptions • Capture convolution relationships among aspects. • Direct the synthesis process Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  23. Evaluation: UMessanger Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  24. Abacus quantification: UMessenger static • Static characteristics of UMessenger Efferent: how many classes do I depend upon? Afferent: the reverse – how many classes depend on me? • Comparison to baseline (Original) • Size reduction as much as 60% • Coupling reduction 16%-33% Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  25. Abacus quantification: UMessenger runtime Response time (usec), memory, Cache misses L1-Instruction, L1-Data, L2 Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  26. Abacus evaluation:Randomized synthesis • Each feature has equal probabilities of being selected (1), unselected(0), and unknown (X) • 5 Runs. 4 valid, 1 invalid. Each run consists of initial manifest (R) and inferred manifest (I) Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  27. Abacus quantification:Randomized static properties • 25%-44% size reduction • 12%-26% efferent coupling reduction • 11%-27% afferent coupling reduction Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  28. Payload transport Within 1% differences Response, memory, cache Memory usage reduction from 5%(RC4) to 24% (RC3) L1-instruction cache miss reduction 3%-8%. L1-data 1%-10%, L2 misses 4% on average Abacus quantification:Randomized runtime properties Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  29. Summary on JiM • It is difficult for pre-postulated middleware architecture to balance between generality and specialty • Just-in-time architecture is a method towards solving this problem through fine granular modularity and a user-driven synthesis procedure • Demonstrated effectiveness through Abacus • General middleware architecture without losing specialty • User-driven composition leads to efficient sizing, memory usages, and performances • Cross-domain support is transparent Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  30. AspeCt-oriented C (ACC)for Systems Development with C ACCv0.8www.AspeCtC.net ~3.500 downloads MIDDLEWARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH GROUP

  31. ACC Feature Overview • Join point • function call, function execution • Pointcut • call, callp , execution, args, result, infile, infunc, cflow • named pointcut, composite pointcut • wildcard matching in pointcut expression • Advice • before, after, around, and proceed() • execution context exposure, reflective info. about join point • Static crosscutting • introduce new member to struct/union via introduce() advice • Miscellaneous • thread-safe • support • ANSI-C • C99 • GCC C language extensions • support of debugging on original source files

  32. AspeCt-oriented C Features

  33. ACC Example: Memory Profiling Aspect #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> size_t totalMem = 0; void print() { printf("total = %d \n", totalMem); } after():execution(int main()){ print(); } before(size_t s):call($ malloc(...)) && args(s){ totalMem += s; } pointcut advice Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  34. AspeCt-oriented C Overview Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

  35. Success Stories • Weave tracing aspect into GCC 4.0.1.2 • advise every function call of gcc • Integrate ACC into existing builds of complex software systems • ORBIT2 (GNOME IPC middleware) • NUT/OS (embedded real-time operating system) • Linux kernel & gcc • Case studies • Red-black tree product family from libavl tree library • use ACC for 3rd year introductory Operating Systems course assignments (add system calls, profiling etc.) Come and See - Go and Get It - http://www.AspeCtC.net

  36. Q & A • Thank you ! Hans-Arno Jacobsen: Tailoring Middleware - Dagstuhl 2008

More Related