1 / 13

NSDI Governance II

NSDI Governance II. Presentation to the Governance II Committee. Context for Report Purpose:. Summarize the report of the FGDC Future Directions governance team Summarize options/recommendations presented to the Steering Committee Summarize Steering Committee Responses

korene
Télécharger la présentation

NSDI Governance II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NSDI Governance II Presentation to the Governance II Committee

  2. Context for ReportPurpose: • Summarize the report of the FGDC Future Directions governance team • Summarize options/recommendations presented to the Steering Committee • Summarize Steering Committee Responses • Present refined options for consideration

  3. Future Directions Governance Team • Intergovernmental team, with external stakeholder participation, established in 2004 • Team engaged in reviews, interviewed stakeholders, and conducted focus group discussions • May, 2005 report to the steering committee recommended: 1. Enhancing the role of the FGDC 2. Establishing a National Geospatial Coordination Council (NGCC) composed of government and non-government representatives 3. Improving the management of federal geospatial programs

  4. June, 2005 Steering Committee Response • The Steering Committee approved recommendations one and three • The committee declined to endorse the NGCC (as outlined in the report), with some members expressing concern about seeking a legislatively-established council • The committee asked that a refined recommendation be developed

  5. Subsequent Activities • Initiated Quarterly Steering Committee Meetings • Developed Charters for the Steering Committee and Coordination Group • Approved Fifty States Initiative proposal • Strengthened NSDI liaisons • Revised FGDC reporting process to focus on results

  6. Additional Steering Committee Guidance - October, 2005 Approved list of Key Characteristics of NSDI Governance, including: • Strong national leadership • Representation of all sectors • Sustainable funding with financial incentives • FGDC coordinating federal activities • Need for a business case showing return on investment

  7. Potential Governance Options • Option 1.NGCC as a FACA Committee composed of governmental and non-governmental entities • Option 2: NGCC composed of Federal, State, and Local representatives • Note: both options would likely include the continuation of FGDC as the federal coordination body for geospatial activities

  8. NGCC as a FACA Committee composed of governmental and non-governmental entities • FACA (the Federal Advisory Committee Act) governs establishment of advisory committees composed of government and non-government representatives • FACA recognizes that such committees “are frequently a useful and beneficial means of furnishing expert advice, ideas, and diverse opinions.” • FACA requires: • Consultation with GSA • Federal Register Notification • A finding by the head of the agency that such a committee is “in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on that agency by law.”

  9. NGCC as a FACA Committee • Reasons supporting a FACA include • The committee will “result in the creation . . . of policies or guidelines affecting agency business” • “The advisory committee will make recommendations resulting in significant improvements in service or reductions in cost, or • “The advisory committee’s recommendations will provide an important additional perspective or viewpoint affecting agency operations

  10. OMB FACA Requirements • In addition to FACA’s own requirements, OMB, in conjunction with an Executive Order, imposes additional standards upon the creation of a FACA advisory committee. They are: • The head of the agency must also find that “compelling considerations necessitate creation of such a committee” • OMB approval is necessary, which will only be granted if: • the committee’s existence is “compelled by considerations of national security, health or safety, or similar national interests, and • the agency creating the committee has not exceeded its limit upon the number of such committees it may maintain

  11. Additional FACA Requirements • The establishing agency must also file a charter with various agencies • The FACA committee must be fairly balanced regarding represented views and functions • The FACA committee’s meetings must be open to the public after providing Federal Register Notice of them • Meetings must be memorialized in detailed minutes • Records must be publicly available • The FACA Expires After Two Years Unless Renewed

  12. 2: NGCC composed of Federal, State, and Local Officials • FACA’s requirements do not apply: • to an advisory committee composed entirely of federal, state, and local government officials, • where the meetings are for any purpose relating to intergovernmental responsibilities or administration • Thus, a non-FACA NGCC could be created administratively if it is composed solely of government officials (federal, state, local, tribal) • The intergovernmental Geospatial One-Stop Board of Directors is a model for this approach

  13. NGCC as an intergovernmental governance body • Pro: This approach could be implemented quickly with less administrative burden than a FACA committee • Con: This option does not provide for direct participation of non-governmental entities.

More Related