1 / 30

Pre-Installed User:

Pre-Installed User:. Combining Engineering And New Technology. Peter Hatcher, P.Eng. Fluor Canada Ltd. March 3, 2004. Engineering & New Technology. Opportunity Unbounded Conventional Wisdom. E P C . Engineering Procurement & Construction (EPC). EPC – Process Industry.

kort
Télécharger la présentation

Pre-Installed User:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pre-Installed User: Combining Engineering And New Technology Peter Hatcher, P.Eng.Fluor Canada Ltd.March 3, 2004

  2. Engineering & New Technology • Opportunity Unbounded • Conventional Wisdom

  3. E P C • Engineering Procurement & Construction (EPC)

  4. EPC – Process Industry • Process Industry – Design Engineering • Conservative • Process Industry - Construction • Proven Technologies • Significant Capital Investments • New Technology - NIMP!!!!

  5. Engineering & New Technology The essence of science: ask an impertinent question, and you are on the way to a pertinent answer Jacob Bronowski

  6. Engineering & New Technology • Examples of Combining Engineering & Technology • Material of Construction • Fabrication • Mechanical Integrity

  7. Impertinent Question #1 • Does Material of Construction exist that allows refining of following crude conditions??? • High conventional corrosion rates • naphthenic acid • polythionic acid • High operating temperatures • sensitization of stainless steels

  8. Material Selection • Conventional Approach Based on Code listed stainless steel materials: • 321/347 • v.g. resistance to sensitization • poor resistance to naphthenic acid corrosion • 316L/317L • v.g. resistance to naphthenic acid corrosion • poor resistance to sensitization Above options do not provide Owner the capability to handle potentially highly corrosive process streams with long term reliability.

  9. Material Selection • Selected Metallurgy Unlisted Material: • 16Cr11Ni2.5MoCb

  10. Strategy • Corrosion Testing • Mechanical Properties • Formability • Weldability • Aggressive Timeline / Complex Execution

  11. Weld Metal

  12. Larson-Miller Parameter

  13. Answer # 1 16Cr11Ni2.5MoCb • Resistance to naphthenic acid attack and sensitization • Thin wall allows for optimal heat transfer and stress reduction • Eliminate need for post weld heat treatment • Eliminate requirement for soda ash wash during shut down

  14. Impertinent Question #2 • How can field pipe welding productivity be improved???

  15. Welding Stainless Steel Piping • GMAW-S • No Backing Gas (NBG)

  16. History • Fluor previously investigated welding of stainless steels without a backing gas using GTAW process • Resulted in quality issues and the ability to reproduce acceptable Code welds

  17. Process Optimization • Optimized selected wire feed speeds • High silicon filler metals • Shielding gas • Welder training

  18. NBG Stainless Steel Welding • Good appearance • No NDE defects • Good mechanical characteristics • Good metallurgical structure • Good Strauss Corrosion Test results • Good Pitting Corrosion Test results • Minimum oxidation on the ID

  19. Weld Root • With Backing Gas • No Backing Gas

  20. Answer #2 GMAW-s NBG • Low repair rate • Eliminates backing gas requirement • Welder friendly • Significant cost savings over other processes

  21. Impertinent Question #3 • How can we ensure integrity of high pressure high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipeline???

  22. Current Practices • Visual exam • Poor correlation to weld quality for heavy wall • Bent-strap test(ASTM D2657) • Low probability of detection:

  23. Current Practices (Continued…) • Traditional UT pulse-echo • Ineffective for heavy wall • Hydro testing • Derived from metallic systems • Viscoelastic plastics • deformation depends on time and temperature • does not ensure long-term performance

  24. UT-TOFD Probes Outer Diameter; Outside wall Lateral Wave Transducer Receiver Upper Tip Lower Tip Flaw Back Wall Echo Inner Diameter; Back wall • Fluor Ultrasonic Probes • Patents are pending on this technology and its application Probes Weld

  25. Development Work • Stage 1 - Laboratory • Calibration blocks • Double-blind test spools • indications correlated to defects • lack of fusion (LOF) identified • Stage 2 - Field Investigation • Operating pipeline, analysis of field welds • Stage 3 - CorrelationUT-TOFD vs. Destructive Testing • Lab test spools • Field welds

  26. Correlation Example Accurate Defect Identification Field Sample TOFD Scan

  27. Development Work Completed • Summary of findings • Visual examination • poor correlation • Backwall echo - lateral wave loss • severe lack of fusion • Multiple point reflectors • non-fusion and poor fusion • Foreign contamination • easily detectable • “Clear” UT-TOFD scan • properly fused Lab Sample Bead Profile - High/Low

  28. Answer #3 UT-TOFD • Current Examination Practices • Not equipped to detect heavy wall flaws and faulty welds • Limits thermoplastic: low pressure, non-critical • New application for pipeline industry • Leap in Quality of testing • Plastics expansion into pipeline industry • UT - TOFD Method • Ultrasonic Time of Flight Diffraction • Reliable - quick - easy

  29. Combining Engineering & Technology 3 examples Conventional Approaches Not Necessarily Optimum Opportunities Abound Summary Engineering & New Technology

More Related