90 likes | 217 Vues
This report outlines a strategic approach to reduce unpaid utility bills and prevent service shutoffs by targeting outreach to eligible low-income households using the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). By utilizing Zip Code Scoring to assess household arrears and overlay EITC indicators, the strategy effectively identifies neighborhoods where outreach efforts can yield the highest impact. The analysis shows that households eligible for EITC often use their benefits to address outstanding utility payments, making this outreach a cost-effective solution for utilities dealing with winter arrears.
E N D
Zip Code Scoring: Targeting EITC Outreach to Delinquent Utility Customers Roger D. Colton Fisher, Sheehan and Colton Public Finance and General Economics Belmont, MA February 2003
Targeting Outbound Mailing • Utility objective:Reduce cost of unpaid bills, prevent shutoffs, and reduce social harms of unaffordable arrears. • Strategy:Use EITC to pay winter arrears and prevent spring payment problems. • Rationale: Data shows that EITC recipients use their EITC benefits to pay household expenses, including past-due utility bills in particular. EITC outreach is a cost-effective mechanism for receiving payment for high end-of-winter arrears.
What is Zip Code Scoring • Determine average arrears systemwide. • Rank each zip code by proportion of average arrears within zip to average arrears systemwide. • Overlay seven Census indicators of EITC potential. • Select Zip Codes with: (1) higher than average arrears; and (2) at least two EITC indicators.
EITC Indicators #1 - #2 • The percent of households with a female householder and no husband present where the female is in the workforce is above the unweighted average for all zip codes systemwide. • Single women householders often earn wages that make them eligible for the EITC. • The percentage of male workers who worked in 1999, but who worked part-time, was greater than the unweighted average for all zip codes systemwide. • Part-time workers are workers who are frequently eligible for EITC and do not realize it.
EITC Indicators #3 - #4 • The percentage of female workers who worked in 1999, but who worked part-time, was greater than the unweighted average for all zip codes systemwide. • There is a common misperception that workers must work fulltime to be eligible for EITC. • Within households having wage or salary income, the average wage or salary income was less than 80% of the average for all zip codes systemwide. • For a zip code to have an average wage or salary income below 80% of the weighted systemwide average, a substantially higher proportion of low wage workers must be present.
EITC Indicators #5 - #6 • The percentage of households with total household income between $10,000 and $30,000 within the zip code is higher than the unweighted average percentage of households with that income for all zip codes systemwide. • Households with incomes of less than $10,000, or more than $30,000, are less likely to be eligible for the EITC. • The percentage of households with incomes between 100% and 150% of the Poverty Level is higher than the unweighted average for all zip codes systemwide. • Households with incomes between 100% and 150% of the federal Poverty Level are likely to have earned income.
EITC Indicator #7 • The percentage of households with incomes between 150% and 200% of the Federal Poverty Level is higher than the unweighted average for all zip codes systemwide. • Households with incomes up to 200% of the Federal Poverty Level are likely to remain eligible for EITC. 200% of the Federal Poverty Level for a three-person household is $30,040, well within EITC eligibility guidelines.
Decision Rule for Outbound Mailings • If a zip code tests positively for an indicator, it is given a score of “1” for that indicator. The total of the scores is then summed. • To be considered a target for outbound EITC outreach to customers with arrears, a zip code must meet the size-of-arrears test and have a score of “2” or more on the EITC indicators.
For more information: roger@fsconline.com