1 / 47

Vaccine Refusal

Vaccine Refusal. William V. Raszka, Jr., MD University of Vermont College of Medicine. Disclosure.

kumiko
Télécharger la présentation

Vaccine Refusal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Vaccine Refusal William V. Raszka, Jr., MD University of Vermont College of Medicine

  2. Disclosure • Neither I nor any member of my immediate family has a financial relationship or interest (currently or within the past 12 months) with any entity producing, marketing, re-selling, or distributing health care goods or services consumed by, or used on, patients. • The opinions presented are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of Fletcher Allen Health Care, University of Vermont College of Medicine, or the Vermont Children’s Hospital • No unapproved use of pharmaceutical agents are discussed

  3. Objectives • Describe the epidemiology of vaccine concerns • Review the reasons for vaccine concerns or refusal • Analyze the data on vaccine safety • Discuss means to allay parental concerns

  4. Smallpox Diphtheria Measles Mumps Pertussis Polio (Paralytic) Rubella Congenital Rubella Syndrome Tetanus Haemophilusinfluenzae 29,005 21,053 530,217 162,344 200,752 16,316 47,745 152 580 20,000 0 0 43 800 10,454 0 12 0 28 202* 100% 100% >99% >99% 95% 100% >99% 100% 95% 99% Vaccine Preventable Diseases in the US 20th Century 2007 Reported Percent Disease Annual Morbidity†Cases††Decrease

  5. 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 PCV7 licensed ≥80 yo: -90% 65-79 yo: -88% 50-64 yo: -80% 18-49 yo: -88% Incidence / 100,000 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Community Effects of Immunization: invasive vaccine associated pneumococcal disease in adults Year

  6. MMWR 2009;58:921

  7. Vaccine Refusal • How many of you have personal experience with someone who has deferred at least one vaccine? • How many of you have personal experience with someone who has refused at least one vaccine? • How many of you have personal experience with someone who has refused all vaccines?

  8. Vaccine Refusal: Scope of the problem • 2004: • 92% report at least one vaccine refusal in past year* • 50% had a family refuse all vaccines^ • 2006 • 2-3% refuse vaccines^^ • 2008 • 20% defer or refuse some vaccines** *Freed JL. Am J Prev Med 2004 ^Flanagan-Klygis EA. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005 **Gust DA Pediatrics 2008 ^^Omer SB. JAMA 2006;296:1757

  9. Vaccine Refusal: Scope of the Problem • 2010* • 2921 parents of 19-35 month old children • 21.8% delayed a vaccine • 2011^ • 11,206 parents of 24-35 month old children • 25.8% delayed a vaccine • 8.2% refused a vaccine • 5.8% delayed and refused a vaccine *Smith PJ. Public Health Rep 2010;125:534 ^Smith PJ. Public Health Rep 2011;126 (Suppl 2):135

  10. Vaccine Refusal Rates:1991-2004 • Mean state wide non medical exemptions • Rates rose from 0.98%-1.48% • Among states with religious exemptions • Rates steady at 1% • Among states with philosophical exemptions • Rate rose from .99% to 2.54% Omer SB. NEJM 2009;360:1981

  11. Washington State Immunization Exemption Rates by School District; 2008-09 www.doh.wa.gov/cfh/Immunize/

  12. Parents with objections to vaccines in Vermont

  13. Parental attitudes toward vaccines (N=1552) Freed GL Pediatrics 2010;125;654-659

  14. Parents With Doubts About Vaccines • At least one vaccine concern (28.1%) • Unsure: vaccinated their child although they were not sure it was the best thing to do (8.9%) • Delayed a vaccination (13.4%) • Refused: to get a vaccination (6.0%) • Concerns associated with increased age, income, and education • Varicella vaccine and no specific vaccine gave the greatest concern Gust DA. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122:718-25

  15. Reasons for increasing parental concern and vaccine refusal • Vaccines are given to healthy children • Perceived risk of disease has diminished • Acceptable risk associated with the vaccine has diminished • Safety is relative not absolute

  16. Reasons for increasing refusal • Different definitions of causality • Medical • Legal • Cannot prove no association between a vaccine and an adverse event exists • Power of the anecdote over science Insert video

  17. Physician response to vaccine refusal • What should be done? • 2005* • 1004 Pediatricians • 54% faced vaccine refusal • 39% would dismiss from practice • 2011^ • 133 pediatricians in CT • >30% have dismissed *Flanagan-Klygis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:929 ^Leib S. Publ Health Rec 2011;126 (suppl 2):13

  18. Parental Concerns about Vaccines • Vaccines • Cause harm 69% • Overwhelm the immune system 49% • Child not at risk for disease 37% • Disease not serious 21% Salmon DA. ArchPediatrAdolesc Med 2005;159:470-476 Bardenheier B. Arch PediatrAdolesc Med 2004;158:569-575 Gust DA. Pediatrics 2008;122: 718-725

  19. Autism Prevalence Rates (ages 6-17) US Department of Education

  20. MMR and Autism Rates in Canada 100 Prevalence/10,000 MMR coverage rate Year of birth Fombonne E. Pediatrics 2006;118;e139-e150

  21. MMR and Autism in Japan Honda J. J Child Psych and Psychiatry 46:6 (2005), pp 572–579

  22. Measles (MMR) and Autism • Institute of Medicine • Rejects an association • National Vaccine Compensation Board • Rejects an association Institute of Medicine. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism 2004

  23. Autism and Thimerosal • Thimerosal • A preservative in vaccines • 50% mercury • Metabolized to ethyl mercury • Organic mercury toxicity • Central nervous system • Fetal>neonatal>adult

  24. Autism and Thimerosal: USA US Department of Education Schechter R. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:19-24

  25. Thimerosal and Autism: Europe Removal of thimerosal Incidence per 10,000 Stehr-Green. Am J Prev Med 2003;25:101

  26. Thimerosal and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes • >1000 children • Various amounts of thimerosal • No relationship between ethyl mercury exposure and neuropsychological outcomes at 7-10 years Thompson WW. NEJM 2007;357:1281

  27. Other Vaccine Ingredients • Aluminum • 295-1225 µg in vaccines at two month visit • Soy formula: 450 to 930 µg/L • Formaldehyde • Trace amounts • Less than usually detected in infants • “Anti-freeze” • Polyethylene glycol in many products • Ethylene glycol

  28. No Need for Vaccines CDC

  29. Measles in the US: Jan-July 2008 • 131 cases • 76% < 20 years old • 91% unvaccinated • 89% imported or associated with importation MMWR 2008;57(33):893

  30. Lack of Efficacy 3 unimmunized 1 death CDC MMWR. January 23, 2009; 58:1-3

  31. Distrust of Government • Oral polio virus • Withdrew a highly successful vaccine • Initial rotavirus vaccine • Identified area of concern • Monitored • Withdrew within 6 months

  32. Overwhelming the immune system 1012 B cell epitopes 1018 T cell epitopes Offit PA. Pediatrics 2002;109:124-129

  33. Natural disease is either: a) better or b) not serious • Complications of VZV in the USA • 11,000 hospitalizations • Bacterial superinfections • Encephalitis (1/100,000) • Ataxia (1/4000) • Congenital varicella (2%) • 100 deaths/year • 50% in children Dermatology Atlas on Line

  34. Vaccine Requirements • The US is fairly unique in requiring vaccinations The state’s duty to protect the public health vs. An individuals right of free choice

  35. Types of Vaccine Exemptions:4/16/09 Personal belief exemptions include religious, philosophical and any other unspecified non-medical exemption All states allow for medical exemptions 48 states allow for religious exemption Approximately ½ allow for philosophical exemption www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm

  36. Background rate of exemptions Exemption rate% Omer SB. JAMA 2006;296:1757

  37. DC DC US US ≥5% ≥5% 2.5-4.9% 2.5-4.9% 1.0-2.4% 1.0-2.4% <1% <1% None Reported None Reported Immunization Exemption Rates: 2005-2006 School Year CDC School Immunization Survey

  38. Immunization Exemptions and Risk of Disease • Pertussis • States with philosophical exemptions: • 2.06 (1.8-2.4) rate over religious only* • Individuals who refused immunizations: • 22.8 (6.7-77.5) risk of disease^ • Varicella • Refusal associated with 8.6 (2.2-33.3) risk of disease** *Omer SB. JAMA 2006;296:1757 ^Glanz JM. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1446-51 **Glanz JM. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010:164:66

  39. Measles and Refusal to Vaccinate • Vancouver Olympics • 2 Canadians, 1 American • 16 people in Vancouver • ½ in one unvaccinated household • San Diego 2008 • Unvaccinated 7 year old acquired measles in Switzerland • 839 exposed people • 73 were unvaccinated children • 25 whose parents chose not to get them vaccinated • 48 children under 12 months too young to be vaccinated • 11 additional cases • $10, 376/case • $775 per quarantined child Sugerman, DE. Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125:747-55,

  40. CDC vs. Dr. Bob’s alternative vaccine schedule 8 Additional visits MMRV all separated and delayed Hepatitis A and B delayed Polio delayed http://health.usnews.com

  41. Dr. Bob’s Selective Vaccine Schedule tetanus selective See No: MMRV, Hep A or B, polio, influenza http://health.usnews.com

  42. Problems with Selective Vaccine Schedules • Reinforce unfounded fears • Encourage parents to hide in the herd • Fail to distinguish between good and bad science • Leave infants and children vulnerable to vaccine-preventable disease • Add to implementation costs • Consume vast amounts of physician time

  43. Prevention • Prenatal visits • Newborn nursery • First visits • Waiting room • Developing a trusting relationship • Listening and caring • Honesty and openness • Competence and expertise

  44. Main reasons parents who planned to delay or not get a vaccine changes their mind Gust DA. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122:718-25

  45. AAA Approach* • Ask: • Do you have any questions about vaccines? • Acknowledge: • I know you want to do what is best for your child, so do I! Many parents feel bombarded with conflicting information and do not know whom to believe • Advise: • To help you make a fully informed decision about immunizations, here are some science-based information sources, unrelated to drug companies *Ed Marcuse; University of Washington. Personal communication

  46. National Campaign • Social Marketing • Evidence based • Targeted • Independent of vaccine manufacturer influences Associated with a cost

  47. Conclusions • Parents risk-benefit view of vaccines has changed • Parents remain concerned about long term neurologic sequelae of vaccines • Many parents want increased flexibility • At a cost of increased office visits • Increased physician time • Minimum availability of some single agent vaccines • Prevention and patience may be key

More Related