1 / 8

Joint Evaluation of GBS Background, process and approach

Joint Evaluation of GBS Background, process and approach. Dissemination Conference, Paris, May 9 th -10 th 2006 Nick York, Steering Group Chair (DFID, UK). Summary. What is Partnership General Budget Support (PGBS) and why is it important? Why carry out this evaluation?

kuniko
Télécharger la présentation

Joint Evaluation of GBS Background, process and approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint Evaluation of GBSBackground, process and approach Dissemination Conference, Paris, May 9th-10th 2006 Nick York, Steering Group Chair (DFID, UK)

  2. Summary • What is Partnership General Budget Support (PGBS) and why is it important? • Why carry out this evaluation? • Approach and methods • How did we get here – what has been required?

  3. What is PGBS and why is it important? • What is Partnership General Budget Support? • Origins and Purposes • Increased prominence since late 1990s • Role of PGBS in poverty reduction

  4. Why do an evaluation of PGBS? • Is PGBS working? • it relevant, effective, efficient, sustainable? • Is it having an impact on poverty and development outcomes? • Can it be designed better? • The first major independent and evidence-based assessment of PGBS • Important time for influencing policy

  5. Who has been involved? • Evaluation team - IDD University of Birmingham and associates. Led by Stephen Lister (Mokoro) • OECD DAC Network on Development Evaluation • Steering Group -24 donors,7 partner Governments • Management Group – chaired by Kate Tench • Reference panel

  6. Approach • Involvement of partner governments • 7 case studies (Burkina Faso, Malawi, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Rwanda, Uganda, Vietnam) • Independence, joint evaluation, reference panel • Systematic, theory based approach • DAC evaluation criteria • Evaluation framework and causality map

  7. Timeline 2001 Evaluability studies (DFID) 2004 Evaluation Framework (Lawson + Booth) Terms of reference and launch Inception phase 2005 Evaluation phase including 7 case studies 2006 Reporting and dissemination

  8. What has been required to produce this • Partnership and cooperation • Leadership • Time • Resources • Skills

More Related