1 / 19

Accountability Progress Report 2013

The 2013 Accountability Progress Report outlines dual accountability systems used in California, highlighting the differences between the Academic Performance Index (API) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) measures. The report documents the slight decline in API scores statewide and within Azusa District from 2003 to 2013. It compares growth at all proficiency levels, identifies target percentages for English Language Arts and Math, and reviews subgroup results. Challenges with federal proficiency targets and the impact of Common Core transitions are also discussed, providing insights for improvement strategies.

kura
Télécharger la présentation

Accountability Progress Report 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Accountability Progress Report2013 Linda Kaminski, Ed.D. Superintendent September 10, 2013

  2. Dual Accountability Systems…Different Accountability Calculations California API: • Growth Measure • Are you improving? • Growth at all proficiency levels • Distinguished School Federal AYP: • Status Measure • Are you over the bar? • Growth at only one proficiency level • Program Improvement

  3. State Accountability - API Academic Performance Index

  4. CA and AUSD API Results “Consistent with the STAR program assessment results, API scores across the state have declined slightly.” -Tom Torlakson, Aug. 29, 2013 API Decline • California - 2 points • Azusa - 2 points

  5. Azusa District API Growth Score 2003 – 2013 AYP Target: 800

  6. Azusa District APIDisaggregated Results 2013

  7. AUSD and CA API Growth Points2008- 2013

  8. Federal Accountability - AYP Adequate Yearly Progress

  9. 2013 AYP Targets – ELAPercent Proficient/Advanced District AYP Target: 89% K-8: 89.2% Gr. 10: 88.9%

  10. Azusa District AYP – ELA2003 – 2013 AYP Target 89%

  11. Azusa District 2013 AYP – ELASubgroup Results AYP Target 89%

  12. 2013 AYP Targets – MathPercent Proficient/Advanced District AYP Target: 89.1% K-8: 89.5% Gr. 10 88.7%

  13. Azusa District AYP– Math 2003 – 2013 AYP Target 89.1%

  14. Azusa District AYP– Math Subgroup Results AYP Target 89.1%

  15. API Achievement The 800 Club • Hodge 815 • Paramount 803 Greatest API Growth • Sierra HS +77 points • Center +15 points • Gladstone HS + 8 points • Mtn. View + 6 points

  16. API Subgroup Growth

  17. Meeting API and AYP Targets“A Tale of Two Targets” API – Growth Measure All Targets: • Mtn. View • Gladstone High • Sierra High Schoolwide Targets: • Paramount • Hodge • Center AYP – Status Measure 86% of CA schools did not meet AYPin 2013

  18. 2013 Program Improvement Unrealistic federal proficiency targets: 61% of Title I LEAs are in Program Improvement Only 28 schools in CA exited PI last year

  19. Common Core Transition

More Related