html5-img
1 / 9

STRONGER State Review Process

STRONGER State Review Process. Presentation to the EPA May 2005 Lori Wrotenbery. 1980 RCRA Amendments. EPA study (1986-87) EPA regulatory determination (1988) Found state and federal regulation to be generally adequate Recognized regulatory gaps and inadequate enforcement

kwebb
Télécharger la présentation

STRONGER State Review Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STRONGERStateReview Process Presentation to the EPA May 2005 Lori Wrotenbery

  2. 1980 RCRA Amendments • EPA study (1986-87) • EPA regulatory determination (1988) • Found state and federal regulation to be generally adequate • Recognized regulatory gaps and inadequate enforcement • Developed a three-pronged approach: • Improve existing programs under RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act, and Clean Water Act • Work with states to improve their programs • Work with Congress on any additional legislation that might be needed

  3. State Review Process • 1989 - IOGCC Council on Regulatory Needs • 1990 - Published first Guidelines and began state reviews • State-by-state reviews of regulatory programs against the published Guidelines • Conducted by multi-interest stakeholder teams • Result in written report of findings and recommendations • 30 reviews of 19 state programs conducted to date

  4. Purposes of State Reviews • To evaluate state oil and gas programs against published Guidelines • To measurethe effectiveness of program implementation • To document program strengths • To identify and recommend areas for state program improvement • To share new or innovative program elements • To increase the understanding of the regulatory process by all stakeholders • To promote consistency among state programs, while allowing flexibility to address unique circumstances

  5. 2000 Guidelines Section 1………Introduction Section 2.……...Scope of the Guidelines Criteria Section 3………General Criteria Section 4………Administrative Criteria Section 5………Technical Criteria Section 6………Abandoned Sites Section 7………NORM Section 8………Performance Measures Section 9………Recommendation for Future Work

  6. 2005 Guidelines Revisions • Updating and Clarification • Enhanced Oilfield Spill Risk Management • Enhanced Program Performance Measurement • Storm Water Management

  7. Stormwater Guidelines • New section of Guidelines • Drafted by stakeholder team with state, industry, and public interest participation • State programs may be rule-based or rely on operator-specific plans • STRONGER may place links to state and other BMPs on its website as a resource

  8. Guidelines Revision Timetable • Draft Guidelines published May 1, 2005 • Comments requested by June 17, 2005 • Revised draft to be published by August • Review by IOGCC in September • Implementation of new Guidelines beginning in 2006

  9. State Review Process Strengths • Guidelines standards established by stakeholders • Guidelines recognize regional differences • Focus on program performance • Reviews performed by multiple stakeholder teams • Reviews document program strengths and opportunities for improvement • Follow-up reviews are conducted • Process can fill regulatory gaps • Process is a model for evaluation of other environmental regulatory programs

More Related