1 / 16

K 0 s reconstruction in ALICE

K 0 s reconstruction in ALICE. G iuseppe Lo Re INFN, Sezione di Catania, and Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy, March 2002. Summary. Introduction Simulation Optimization of cuts Results Conclusions. Introduction.

kyleg
Télécharger la présentation

K 0 s reconstruction in ALICE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. K0s reconstruction in ALICE Giuseppe Lo Re INFN, Sezione di Catania, and Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy, March 2002

  2. Summary • Introduction • Simulation • Optimization of cuts • Results • Conclusions

  3. Introduction V0 position = middle point between the two tracks at the distance of closest approach Dpn = distance of closest approach Sec. vertex Dpn Radial distance Primary vertex

  4. Simulation • B = 0.2 T • Aliroot v 3.06 • Event generator: HIJING (full) • - generated 31 events with b = 3 fm • “Slow” simulation of the ITS • Tracking V1 in the ITS (with 6 points) • - step 1: with vertex constraint • - rejection of the “primary tracks” • - step 2: without vertex constraint • Straight line approximation from the beam pipe backwards to the primary vertex • Combination of + and - tracks and application of the cuts • - search of K0S within a fiducial region (R=0.5-2.5 cm)

  5. List of the cuts used • Cut 1: product of the radial impact parameter (Dr-  Dr+) • Cut 2: distance of closest approach (Dpn) • Cut 3: angle between the K0s position vector and the K0s momentum () • Cut 4: impact parameter of the daughters (D) • Cut 5: 2 of the daughters

  6. Cut 1: product of the radial impact parameter Dr-  Dr+ < 0 Sec. vertex  - + Primary vertex Dr- Dr+

  7. Cut 2: distance of closest approach (Dpn) Dpn < 0.14 cm

  8. Cut 3: angle between the K0s position vector (R) and the K0s momentum (PK)  Cos  > 0.9985 PK Sec. vertex Primary vertex R

  9. Effect of cuts Dr-  Dr+ < 0 Without any cut Mass (GeV/c2) Dpn < 0.14 cm Cos  > 0.9985

  10. Results N. found K0S  2.5 per event

  11. x, y and z resolution of secondary vertices

  12. ,  and Pt resolution  = 5 mrad  = 3 mrad

  13. Efficiency of algorithm and cuts Eff = no. of found K0s / no. of findable K0s after the TPC-ITS tracking Found Eff. = 32 % Fake Prob. = 11 %

  14. Total found efficiency Eff = no. of found K0s / no. of generated K0s Found Eff. = 0.37 % Fake Prob. = 0.12 %

  15. Reconstructed Pt spectrum Reconstructed spectrum Generated spectrum

  16. Conclusions and future work • The problem of reconstructing K0S in ALICE is under investigation in a realistic simulation framework • An algorithm for Aliroot has been written and its resolution and efficiency have been evaluated • Evaluation of the effect of a different choice of the fiducial region • Simulations with a magnetic field of 0.4 T • Studies for reconstructing the s are already started

More Related