1 / 6

Common Mode Noise

First results on MIMOSA V tests at DESY. Common Mode Noise. T=287 K. Cells of 32x32 pixels were used to calculate common mode noise Clear spatial dependence of common mode noise but the noise is small – look the following slides Mean common mode shift (average) is close to 0. Pedestals.

lakia
Télécharger la présentation

Common Mode Noise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. First results on MIMOSA V tests at DESY Common Mode Noise T=287 K • Cells of 32x32 pixels were used to calculate common mode noise • Clear spatial dependence of common mode noise but the noise is small – look the following slides • Mean common mode shift (average) is close to 0

  2. Pedestals Pixel pedestal distribution Mean pedestal vs. temperature T of the coolant and not the detector is given There may be a systematic shift! • Error bars are RMS of the pixel pedestal distribution • fit function (good agreement) • Pedestal runs with 100 events were analyzed • Common mode subtracted • Asymmetrical distribution Fit parameters pedestals can be used to measure Ileak after irradiation Leakage current term

  3. Noise Mean noise vs. temperature Pixel noise distribution T=287 K • Error bars are RMS of the pixel pedestal distribution and not the error of the mean • fit function - good agreement with expected behavior Fit parameters (p0,p1) Leakage current term

  4. Signal from 55Fe 5.9 keV line Single pixel signal is required (neighbors without signal – escape g is not detected) 6.4 keV line HIT MAP Fe55 • Peak used to calibrate the noise ENC~30-35 • (LEPSI claims ~ 20 , but at what T ?) • Expected signal from m.i.p. are around 1000 e S/N~30 T=286 K – how much offset do we have? y [pixel] x [pixel]

  5. 106Ru – electrons Cluster Signal Cluster size distribution single pixel 3x3 array 5x5 array S/Nneig.=2 T=286 K Landau function fit • S/Ncluster~28 (close to that predicted from Fe X-source and noise) • small difference in most probable signal between 3x3 and 5x5 pixel arrays • Average cluster size ~ 6 • spectrum broader than for m.i.p.

  6. Conclusions and Plans • We clearly have a working chip, however noise is 10e higher compared to that measured in Strasbourg. • Noise(T) and Pedestal(T) clearly resemble leakage current behavior • – what is actual T of the detector? • Common mode noise is small • Spectra look reasonable – but activity of 55Fe is too high – in the future we will use additional absorber • Migration to new PC • Analysis software is being developed by Pawel and Gregor. At the moment there is a temporary solution available • DAQ software will be addressed after analysis one is done

More Related