1 / 9

The Great Reform Act 1832

The Great Reform Act 1832. Background to the reform. Elections Pre-1832. Who could vote? County seats men who owned land worth 40 shillings (approx £100) Boroughs varied enormously In 1831 12-13% of males could vote out of a total population of 24,132,294.

lamar
Télécharger la présentation

The Great Reform Act 1832

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Great Reform Act 1832 Background to the reform

  2. Elections Pre-1832 • Who could vote? • County seats men who owned land worth 40 shillings (approx £100) • Boroughs varied enormously • In 1831 12-13% of males could vote out of a total population of 24,132,294. • Elections only held if the seat was contested. • Many boroughs were controlled by large landowners.

  3. Who had all the power? • The Landowners • Very important they represented law an order and providers of welfare • The idea of deference • It was the expectation that man of rank would represent ordinary people.

  4. Types of borough constituency • Rotten borough – areas with little or no population but still had an MP. Old Sarum near Salisbury no people, landowner was the voter. • Pocket borough – landowner used his influence to control the voters to elect the candidate of his choice • Scot and Lot – all the men who paid local taxes could vote • Potwalloper – men could vote if they lived in a house with a fire place large enough to boil a pot. • Corporations – only members of the local council could vote • Freeman = all men who had acquired the title of freeman through an apprenticeship could vote.

  5. Arguments against Reform • The French Revolution • Democracy = mob rule • Democracy was seen as a threat to the rights of a freeborn Englishman not an ideal. • System was not unrepresentative – it represented all major economic interests • A man may not have the vote but is represented by the landlord.

  6. Arguments for Reform • Need to reduce the influence of the King and his ministers. • The allocation of MP’s to boroughs depended on its status in the Middle Ages • Example Dunwich in 1831 32 electors and 2 MP’s. Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds no representation in Parliament. • The Rights of Man – legitimate Government must had a mandate from the people in governed.

  7. Catholic Emancipation • The impact of Catholic Emancipation was huge – it paved the way for further reform • “the battering ram that broke down the old system” • This measure showed that you could change a system.

  8. Views on Reform • Traditional view is that reform came about because of the gradual pressure from without. • More recent research suggests that the move to reform came from within – MP’s started to recognise the need for change. • In the country – rising middle class demanded a say in politics • The return of popular radicalism • Swing Riots, formation of Political unions • Parliament needed to regain the trust of the people

  9. Key issues • What were the main features of the old system? • Why had this system survived so long? • How and why did the Tories and the Whig parties differ over the issue of reform?

More Related