1 / 26

A Parallel Genetic Algorithm For Performance-Driven VLSI Routing By Jens Lienig

A Parallel Genetic Algorithm For Performance-Driven VLSI Routing By Jens Lienig Tanner Research, Inc. Ashutosh Nagle. Why this paper?. Paper on parallel GA – The Requirement Lets understand GA part without knowing too much of domain specifics

lara
Télécharger la présentation

A Parallel Genetic Algorithm For Performance-Driven VLSI Routing By Jens Lienig

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Parallel Genetic Algorithm For Performance-Driven VLSI Routing By Jens Lienig Tanner Research, Inc. Ashutosh Nagle

  2. Why this paper? • Paper on parallel GA – The Requirement • Lets understand GA part without knowing too much of domain specifics • Claims to be the first paper that considered crosstalk – a performance parameter in VLSI • Still a negative point – Gauges performance more by VLSI parameters than parallelism – true with most papers

  3. Problem Description • Groups of pins – called nets. • Pins of a net to be connected together. • No two of different nets connected together.

  4. Sample Solution [1]

  5. A good solution Is the one that minimizes • – Crosstalk • – Network delays

  6. Issues and Influencing Factors • Issues in generating a routing solution • Pins very closely located  Crosstalk • Electrical delays  smaller the better • Factors • Crosstalk – depends on the total length of parallel segments of different nets • Network delays • Number of joints – vias • Total length of connection – netlength

  7. Problem Formulation • A “good solution” minimizes – • – Crosstalk • – Total length of parallel net segments • – Number of vias • – Netlength – • square for “increased pressure” on • longer nets • – Network delays • Use user defined weights for the three

  8. 1 F = ω1 * lp + ω2 * vp + ω3 * pp Fitness Function [1] Lp= Netlength as sum of quadratic function of the length of each net vp = Number of vias Pp = Sum of lengths of parallel net segments ω 1, ω 2, ω3 = User defined weights

  9. Algorithm – Characteristics • Population is comprised of possible routing solutions • Topology – torus with 8 SPARC workstations • Uses stepping stone model – Migration only with neighbors • Selection – Roulette-wheel • 1 bit crossover • Uses mutation • Migration after configurable number of generations

  10. Algorithm Details – Encoding [2] G (x, y, z) = j j = 0  Point is unoccupied j positive  Point occupied by net j j negative  point is a pin of net j and so can not be moved

  11. F(x) ∑yЄP F(y) Selection • Roulette-wheel – Stochastic sampling with replacement • Probability of an individual x getting selected from population P is – Prob{x gets selected} = [3]

  12. Crossover [1] • Uses single point crossover

  13. Mutation • Random Mutation • -A rectangle of random size width×height around a random center (x, y, z) is selected and all connections in it are erased. • - The connections are reestablished randomly

  14. Reduction • Subpopulation size = 50 • Number of offspring = 20 • Fittest 50 go to the next generation • Advantages: • Size of subpopulation maintained • “Good” individuals of previous generations survive in subsequent ones

  15. Outperformed Results

  16. Results – With No Migration

  17. Results – With Epoch 25Gen.

  18. Results – With Epoch 50Gen.

  19. Results – With Epoch 75Gen.

  20. Conclusion The paper proposes an effective way of applying parallel genetic algorithm to VLSI routing problem, but does not give detailed comparison of parallel and sequential algorithms as far as time is concerned.

  21. References • [1] J. Lienig, “A Parallel Genetic Algorithm for Performance-Driven VLSI Routing”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1997. • [2] J . Lienig and Thulasiraman, “A Genetic Algorithm for Channel Routing in VLSI Circuits”, Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 4, 1994. • [3] D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1989.

  22. Questions?

  23. Random solution generation [2]

  24. Abbreviations: • GAP = Genetic Algorithm – Parallel; • YK =Yoshimura-Kuh Channel; • BDC = Burstein’s Difficult Channel; • J6_12 = Joo6_12; • J6_13 = Joo6_13; • J6_16 = Joo6_16; • J6_17 = Joo6_17; • PS = Pedagogical Switchbox; • BDS = Burstein’s Difficult Switchbox; • DS = Dense Switchbox; • ADS = Augmented Dense Switchbox.

  25. Sequential Algorithms • WEAVER • Yosh.-Kuh • PACKER • SAR • Monreale • Silk • BEAVER

  26. Notes • Best results with • W1 = 1.0 • W2 = 2.0 • W3 = 1.0 • Other w3 values – 0.01 and 4.0

More Related