1 / 39

Tom Peters’ RevGov2001 * *Revolutionary Government/11.15.2001

This article discusses the need for revolutionary government structures in a rapidly changing and ambiguous world. It emphasizes the importance of agility, experimentation, and talent in government organizations. It also highlights the role of technology, partnerships, and visionary leadership in shaping the future of government. The article concludes with a plea for a responsive and effective government that embraces change and is focused on creating impact.

larevalo
Télécharger la présentation

Tom Peters’ RevGov2001 * *Revolutionary Government/11.15.2001

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tom Peters’RevGov2001**Revolutionary Government/11.15.2001

  2. WE NEED …IDEAS!

  3. “There will be more confusion in the business world in the next decadethan in any decade in history. And the current pace of change will only accelerate.”Steve Case

  4. Uncertainty: We don’t know when things will get back to normal.Ambiguity: We no longer know what “normal” means.

  5. BMcC: (1) Hierarchy vs. “Network organization.” (2) NWO = “Doctrine as center of gravity”/source of motivation; distributed support & decision-making;largely self-organizing; “outside the military sphere.”

  6. “Our military structure today is essentially one developed and designed by Napoleon.”Admiral Bill Owens, former Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff

  7. “In an era when terrorists use satellite phones and encrypted email,US gatekeepers stand armed against them with pencils and paperwork, and archaic computer systems that don’t talk to each other.”Boston Globe (09.30.2001)

  8. From: Weapon v. WeaponTo:Org structure v. Org structure

  9. Ideas > Leadership

  10. NO: “Good gov’t”YES: EFFECTIVE Gov’t (in altered/ambiguous times)

  11. A Plea for “virtual [RESPONSIVE] government”

  12. Agile.

  13. WALLS MUST FALL!

  14. The W.O.G.(Work-of-Government):Insta- Targeted WPTs(WOW(B.H.A.G.) Project Teams (with clout) )

  15. Experimentsrule!

  16. Failuresrule!

  17. Talent matters!

  18. New Heroes/Hall of Fame

  19. IS/IT to the Max!

  20. Streamlinedprocurement(esp. IS/IT)

  21. Tomorrow’s Organizations: Itinerant Potential Machines

  22. TALENT POOL TO DIE FOR. Youthful. Insanely energetic. Value creativity. Risk taking is routine. Failing is normal … if you’re stretching. Want to ‘make their bones” in “the revolution.”Love the new technologies. Well rewarded. Don’t plan to be around 10 years from now.

  23. TALENT POOL PLUS. Seek out and work with “world’s best” as needed (it’s often needed). “We aim to change the world, and we need gifted colleagues—who well may not be on our payroll.”

  24. BRASSY-BUT-GROUNDED-LEADERSHIP.Say “I don’t know”—and then unleash the TALENT. Have a vision to be DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT—but don’t expect the co. to be around forever. Will scrap pet projects, and change course 180 degrees—and take a big write-off in the process. NO REGRETS FROM SCREW-UPS WHOSE TIME HAS NOT-YET-COME. GREAT REGRETS AT TIME & $$$ WASTED ON “ME TOO” PRODUCTS AND PROJECTS.

  25. BRASSY-BUT-GROUNDED-LEADERSHIP. (Cont.)“Visionary” leaders matched by leaders with shrewd business sense: “HOW DO WE TURN A PROFIT ON THIS GORGEOUS IDEA?” Appreciate “market creation” as much as or more than “market share growth.” ARE INSANELY AWARE THAT MARKET LEADERS ARE ALWAYS IN PRECARIOUS POSITIONS, AND THAT MARKET SHARE WILL NOT PROTECT US, IN TODAY’S VOLATILE WORLD, FROM THE NEXT KILLER IDEA AND KILLER ENTREPRENEUR. (Gates. Ellison. Venter. McNealy. Walton. Skilling. Case. Etc.)

  26. ALLIANCE MANIACS.Don’t assume that “the best resides within.” WORK WITH A SHIFTING ARRAY OF STATE-OF-THE-ART PARTNERS FROM ONE END OF THE “SUPPLY CHAIN” TO THE OTHER. Including vendors and consultants and … especially … PIONEERING CUSTOMERS … who will “pull us into the future.”

  27. TECHNOLOGY-NETWORK FANATICS.Run the whole-damn-company, and relations with all outsiders, on the Internet … at Internet speed. Reluctant to work with those who don’t share this (radical) vision.

  28. POTENTIAL MACHINES-ORGANISMS. Don’t know what’s coming next. But are ready to jump at opportunities, especially those that challenge-overturn our own “way of doing things.”

  29. P.S.: The CONSTITUTION matters!(Life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness—and the Bill of Rights)REPRESENTATIVE GOV’T matters.(Filter the worst of mass sentiments—Hobbes rules)

  30. Case: Bill Owens … Lifting the Fog of War

  31. “The 1990s was a decade of multiple revolutions—political, economic, technological—that changed so thoroughly the way we live that the past no longer seems a good guide to the future (in fact the past seems precisely the wrong guide). So it is in the world of military affairs. The RMA is our opportunity to use the new information technology to change the very nature of the military—in a way that could reinvigorate American political, diplomatic and economic leadership in the world for decades to come.” –Bill Owens, Lifting the Fog of War

  32. “Our military is very good at doing things as they are supposed to be done, but it is not always good at changing the way things ought to be done. Highly professional militaries can be very good at maintaining the institution’s traditions, mores and cultures in the face of rapid and important change. … Equating professionalism with automatically defending the status quo can be disastrous. This is the mindset that drives service loyalties toward narrow parochialism, and congeals organizations into brittle shells. We end up ignoring opportunities that could actually offer higher military effectiveness.” –Bill Owens, Lifting the Fog of War

  33. “How dare you. If you don’t support us, our opponents will take advantage and use this to cut the force.” –CNO staffer [Flag officer] to Bill Owens, 6th Fleet Commander

  34. “Mike [Boorda’s] self-avowed priority was to preserve and protect the size, budget and structure of the U.S. Navy—his Navy—irrespective of any other consideration—because he deeply believed that the Navy was the core of America’s military capability. My view over the years had shifted toward the conviction that we in the Navy need to implement major changes in order to become more joint—to work better and more closely with the other services.”–Bill Owens, Lifting the Fog of War

  35. “Many flaws remained—flaws not from poor performance, but from an ingrained command hierarchy and an outmoded concept of war that had taken root during World War II and then during the cold war. Desert Storm was a joint military operation in name rather than in fact. … The battlefield was divided among service components. … The fiefdoms existed not only because of tradition, service rivalry and the egos of the commanders; they were also there because of technological limitations. We did not have the communications capability to do it differently.” –Bill Owens, Lifting the Fog of War

  36. “Once devised in Riyadh, the tasking order took hours to get to the Navy’s six aircraft carriers—because the Navy had failed years earlier to procure the proper communications gear that would have connected the Navy with its Air Force counterparts. … To compensate for the lack of communications capability, the Navy was forced to fly a daily cargo mission from the Persian Gulf and Red Sea to Riyadh in order to pick up a computer printout of the air mission tasking order, then fly back to the carriers, run photocopy machines at full tilt, and distribute the documents to the air wing squadrons that were planning the next strike.” –Bill Owens, Lifting the Fog of War

  37. “By combining powerful computer technology and other modern information-based systems we could make a revitalized, leaner military force that is designed to outsee, outmaneuver and outfight any foe.”--Bill Owens, Lifting the Fog of War

  38. RMA: (1) Battlespace awareness. (2) C4I. (Command, control, communications, computers & intelligence.) (3) Precision force use.

  39. “[The RMA] means creating a synergy in new weapons, sensors and communications that is made possible by the successful melding of the technological applications with an information-age military organization.” –Bill Owens, Lifting the Fog of War

More Related