Inquiry Primer Version 1.0
Explore the principles of effective science instruction based on research findings. Discover strategies for engaging students, promoting conceptual change, and utilizing evidence in the classroom.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 3: Good Science Instruction
Inquiry Primer Part 1:Vision and Challenge for Science Education Part 2:Ohio Core and the Implications for Science Education Part 3:Good Science Instruction
What does research tell us about good science instruction? Reform advocates • Students working in small groups • Hands-on activities • Focusing on student-selected topics Traditionalists • Deliver information with lectures or reading • Students working on practice problems and worksheets • Students doing “confirmatory” laboratory activities – Center on Instruction (2008)
Good Science Instruction • Good science instruction is effective science instruction • Current learning theory focuses on students’ conceptual change • No implication that one pedagogy is better than another – National Research Council’s How People Learn (2003) – National Research Council’s How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom (2005) – Center on Science Instruction
Implications for Instruction Conceptual change involves students: • Making conceptions explicit to become aware of own ideas and thinking • Constantly evaluating and revising conceptions • Adopting more fruitful conceptions • Discarding misconceptions brought to learning environment
Effective Science Instruction • Motivation • Eliciting students’ prior knowledge • Intellectual engagement • Use of evidence to make, critique claims • Sense-making – Center on Research (2008)
Motivation • Extrinsic motivation • Intrinsic motivation
Eliciting Students’ Prior Knowledge • What do students know about concept? • What do students want to know? • Why do students want to know? • What will students learn by end of lesson or unit?
Intellectual Engagement • Meaningful experiences with science or related to science • Engagement in intellectual work
Using Evidence to Make, Critique Claims • Sources of evidence • Resolution of discrepancies or conflicting data • Confidence data are valid • Support, critique of conclusions
Sense-making • Whole class discussion with appropriate teacher questioning • Written student reflection using well-designed questions, guiding prompts • Application of ideas to other contexts
Effective Science Instruction • Follows Learning Cycle model • Focuses on inquiry-based experiences • Employs formative assessment to uncover naïve concepts • Uses data to inform instruction
Learning Cycle Relationships Engage: motivation Explore: elicit prior knowledge, intellectual engagement Explain: use of evidence and sense-making Expand: use of evidence and sense-making Assess: effectiveness of instruction
Good Science Instruction • Occurs in classrooms with either traditional or reform-based pedagogies • Incorporates multiple pedagogies • Includes the five elements of effective science teaching • Utilizes Learning Cycle • Ensures multiple exposure to and complex interactions with knowledge
Feedback • How helpful is the Primer in your particular context for generating discussions, increasing awareness? • What should be changed? • What else is needed for greater service? Contact: constance.barsky@ode.state.oh.us