210 likes | 319 Vues
The PAEE 2009 project discusses the vital role of teamwork in engineering education, emphasizing that success is achieved through collaboration among individuals. Arvid Andersen of Copenhagen University College highlights the steps of team development, from forming to performing, and stresses the significance of creating a supportive and innovative atmosphere. The project promotes the integration of various engineering disciplines, the importance of communication, and sustainable design practices. Emphasizing personal competencies and peer assessment techniques, it advocates for an improved learning experience in engineering.
E N D
PAEE 2009Project Approaches in Engineering Education”The AddedValue of Teamwork”University of Minho, Portugal21-22 July, 2009Project Management and Teamwork Arvid AndersenCopenhagen University College of EngineeringDenmarkjar@ihk.dk; Arvid.Andersen@email.dk PAEE´2009
Project Management Arvid Andersen All projects are carried out by people – success is achieved through people working in teams People management is the most important element of project management – it is people who get things done, not objectives, not plans, not machines and not schedules (althouhg all these are important) PAEE´2009
Creativity and Innovation • A benign atmosphere showing openness and trust will motivate, stimulate and promote development of creative ideas and innovation. • Ideally, teams promise to promote synergy where results outweigh the sum of individual contribution. PAEE´2009 Arvid Andersen
Working in Teams • A Team is: - a task-tuned group of people - a group of people working together to chieve ocjectives which are shared - a social unit deliberately designed PAEE´2009 Arvid Andersen
Teamwork • Is more than just teambuilding. • Is the ability to work together towards a common vision. • Is the ability to direct individual acomplishment. • Is the fuel that allows ordinary people to attain extraordinary results. • Is less I and more We. PAEE´2009 Arvid Andersen
Working on Projects • A goodproject : - Emphasizesapplication of theory - Involvesengineering design work - Is innovative and necessitates a team approach - Is important to the provider - Is not routine - Has not to manyconstraints over confidenti allity Arvid Andersen PAEE´2009
Team Development • Stage 1 – Forming - The team gets to know each other - The team begins to understand each others views, ideas, expectations and objectives - The team members test each other out - Individuals begin to create a personal identity - The team is guarded about issues raised and opinions given PAEE´2009 Arvid Andersen
Team Development • Stage 2 – Storming - Opinions more openly and forcefully presented - Group leadershipmaybechallenged - Someinfighting as allegiancesareques- tioned - Nature of the task and programmeChallen ged - Somemembersfeeldemotivated and leave Arvid Andersen PAEE´2009
Team Development • Stage 3 – Norming - More organisedwith procedures and sys stems to achieveparticulargoals - The skillslevel, competences and behavi oural norms for eachmemberbecomeapp arent - Interpersonalbarriersfallinto the backgr ound - Increasedco-operation and exchange of views, ideas and opinions ”The sooner the groupattempts to fulfillcertaintaskgoals, the sooner it will break of the infighting stage” PAEE´2009 Arvid Andersen
Team Development • Stage 4 – Performing • Team matured and workingwelltogether • Increasedcohesionwithmemberssupportingoneanother and sharing information and ideas • Toleratingeachothers differences • Able to marshalitsfullresources to persue the commongoal Howquickly the team progressesdependon the leader´sskill in reconciling differences, developingcohesion and assisting the group in identifyingwitheachother Arvid Andersen PAEE´2009
Teamwork is • Group performance with regard to: - The product produced - The process excuted - The people involved Arvid Andersen PAEE´2009
Barriers to Communication • Language • Cultural behaviour • Speaking skills • Listening skills Arvid Andersen PAEE´2009
Peer and Self-AssessmentTechniques • Weekly meetings with supervisors • Regular meetings with company representatives • Project and people review meetings • Collaborative agreements • Improvement reports • Personal improvement plans Arvid Andersen PAEE´2009
Integrated Engineering • Integrated engineering involves the interrelated work of several disciplines • The disciplines involved in a given project are chosen according to the need of the project provider and the academic world • Working in an integrated engineering context emphasizes development of personal competences Arvid Andersen PAEE´2009
Steps in environmentally sound design • Evaluatematerials and processes. • Make sure that the product is easy to takeapart in order to reuse. • Make the design simple and eliminatepainting and dangeroussolubles . • If packing is necessary, make sure that it is reuseableorbiologicallydegradeable. • Design a long lifeinto the product. • Design a long lifeinto the product. • Make sure that the end usercanrepair and reusecomponents. • Sustainableengineeringdevelopment and environmentalconcern. Arvid Andersen PAEE´2009
Statements • Why do fewer students takeengineeringeducation? (SN36-1990) • Engineering students sufferfacturaloverloads (SN36-1990) • Lookingahead to 2020, whatwillbe the most importantskills, knowledge and behaviors for students to acquire to provide Ohio withcompetitiveadvantages in the global economy? (ASEE 2. Jan. 2009) PAEE´2009
Learning in Teams • It´s not enough to tell and show students, they must beinvolved to learn • Don´tspoon-feed students • Don´toverfillsyllabusses • Allow time to wonder • Provide time to developknowledge, insight and skills • Help students to developcriticalthinkingskills,whichwillimprovetheirconfidence and theirability to dare PAEE´2009
First team-meeting agenda • Attitude test, group work • What is your level of ambition? • What is required of you by your home university? • What is your opinion of working long hours? • Problem/project formulation exercise NB: A minute of the meeting should be placed in the team log book. PAEE´2009
Education should be changed • Engineers commonly describe themselves in terms of a single discipline, a convention increasingly misleading. Therefore reasons to adjust or change education should be considered. PAEE´2009
Reasons to change education 1 • Very few engineers work totally within the confines of a single discipline or industry. • Fundamental changes in working attitudes, and greater emphasis on multidisciplinary and multinational environments, highlights the need for a radically different approach to education and training. • Traditional specialism no longer apply in the world dictated by a bigger overlap of engineering and science. • The accelerating evolution of technology accompanied by a growing amount of knowledge, much of which continuously become redundant, require a new approach to education and training and changes of the curriculum. PAEE´2009
Reasons to change education 2 • We have to provide a “deep” learning environment in which acquiring insight will take precedence over conventional specialist courses. • Continuing education has become a more determinant factor in career development and is part of a through-career education and training. • Easier access to knowledge through the ongoing advances in information technology should be coupled with improvements in teaching and assessment techniques. • Accreditation boards should be aware of the changing conditions and adjust accordingly. They should appreciate the new professional equipped with a broad range of entrepreneurial skills. PAEE´2009