1 / 10

Learner interactivity in higher education: Comparing face-to-face, hybrid, and online instruction

Learner interactivity in higher education: Comparing face-to-face, hybrid, and online instruction. Brannan, T. A. (2005).Learner interactivity in higher education: Comparing face-to-face, hybrid, and online instruction. Distance Learning,2 (2 ), 1-8. Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen

lauriew
Télécharger la présentation

Learner interactivity in higher education: Comparing face-to-face, hybrid, and online instruction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Learner interactivity in higher education: Comparing face-to-face, hybrid, and online instruction Brannan, T. A. (2005).Learner interactivity in higher education: Comparing face-to-face, hybrid, and online instruction. Distance Learning,2(2),1-8. Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen Reporter: Po-hung Chen

  2. Purpose • The purpose of this study was to compare the opinions of students toward the interactions they encounter while taking college courses in face-to-face, hybrid, and completely online environments. • How the interactions were encouraged in four categories; student-instructor interactions, student-student interactions, student-content interactions, and student-technology interactions

  3. Theory • Moore proposed a theory of distance education based on the need to accommodate within the classroom three essential interactions: • learner-content,learner-instructor, and learner-learner • In 1994, Hillman, Willis, and Gunawardena augmented Moore's model with a fourth interaction, learner-interface

  4. learner-content • can be defined as the process of "intellectually interacting with content" to bring about changes in the learner's understanding, perspective, or cognitive structures • learner-instructor examines an instructor's attempt to motivate and stimulate the learner and allows for clarification the learner may need regarding the content of the learning (Moore, 1989).

  5. Learner-learner • between one learner and another or among groups of learners with or without instructor intervention. • learner-interface • A facet of distance education that is increasingly overlooked is the effect of high-technology devices on interaction .

  6. Methodolgy • Students who attended seven courses at Lansing Community College that were offered via all three instructional methods face-to-face, hybrid, and online during the fall semester of 2001. • A survey instrument containing open-ended questions was used to gather information on how the four interactions instructor-student, student-student, content-student, technology-student were encouraged.

  7. Methodolgy • The survey also included a Likert-type item to collect information regarding the students' rating of each of the four interactions. Demographic information regarding age, computer skill, pursuance of a degree/certificate, and sex was collected from participants in the study.

  8. Conclusion • The findings of this study supported the use of technology in instruction and found that technology can increase the four interactions found in the classroom.

More Related