1 / 11

Larry Bencze, OISE, U. Toronto Steve Alsop, York U, Toronto

Towards … Communitarian Science Education. Larry Bencze, OISE, U. Toronto Steve Alsop, York U, Toronto. IHPST 2009. Who Owns ‘Science’?. Jonas Salk - Developer of first safe & effective vaccine for Polio.

lavanya
Télécharger la présentation

Larry Bencze, OISE, U. Toronto Steve Alsop, York U, Toronto

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Towards … Communitarian Science Education Larry Bencze, OISE, U. Toronto Steve Alsop, York U, Toronto IHPST 2009

  2. Who Owns ‘Science’? Jonas Salk - Developer of first safe & effective vaccine for Polio "Shortly after a large-scale clinical trial in 1955, the first inactivated polio vaccine was being injected into tens of millions of people around the world - possibly the most successful pharmaceutical product launch in history. Asked why he had not obtained a patent on the phenomenally successful vaccine, Jonas Salk reportedly replied, 'That would be like patenting the sun.' A few decades later, this view seemed laughably quaint."

  3. Business-Science Partnerships • ‘Communalism’: • e.g., Dr. Nancy Olivieri, Hospital for Sick Children; deferiprone, drug for thalassemia major; Company suppressed negative results. • ‘Universal’: • e.g., restricted access to software by companies. • ‘Disinterestedness’: • e.g., prevent research into uncommon diseases (e.g., schistosomiasis) - since they are unprofitable. • ‘Originality’: • e.g., ‘Me-too’ drugs! • ‘Skepticism’: • e.g., Ghost Writers! Profit & Merton’s Norms Craig Venter

  4. Why is this happening?! • Global Economization • Neoliberalism • Neoconservatism

  5. How is School Science Involved? • Neoconservativismworks to preserve traditional forms of privilege and marginalize authentic democratic and social justice agendas … (Carter, 2005, p. 571). • Competition for scarce ‘capital’ • Selection via decontextualization and intensification • Overall • ‘Survival of the Richest!’

  6. How is School Science Involved? • Neoliberals aim to condition students in ways conducive to often-irresponsible for-profit production and consumption of goods and services. Students’ conceptions of self vs. others … e.g., Possessive individualism via individualized assessments of ‘finished’ science

  7. How is School Science Involved? Students’ conceptions of science … • Rational & Real • Privately Owned • e.g. knowledge = marks • e.g., critical experiments • e.g., heroes!

  8. How is School Science Involved? Students’ lack of capital … • De-skilled • Confused • Isolated • Homogenized

  9. Towards Communitarian Science Education • Equity & Diversity • Holism & Breadth • Empowerment & Depth • Critical Literacy • Self-determination • Responsibility

  10. STEPWISE In Action

  11. Thanks! • The paper is at: • http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca/~lbencze/IHPST2009_Bencze-Alsop.pdf • You can write to me at: • larry.bencze@utoronto.ca • The Project for Activist Science & Technology Education (PASTE) (with the journal, JASTE, is at: • http://www.wepaste.org

More Related