1 / 30

Index

COMPARISSON OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONNECTING BUSINESS PROCESSES AMONG ENTERPRISES Maja Pušnik, dr. Marjan Heričko. Index. Introducing the problem Needs of the market Existing technologies Evaluations Conclusion. 1. Introducing the problem. B2B. B2B. Medium enterprises. Big enterprises.

layne
Télécharger la présentation

Index

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COMPARISSON OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONNECTING BUSINESS PROCESSES AMONG ENTERPRISESMaja Pušnik, dr. Marjan Heričko

  2. Index • Introducing the problem • Needs of the market • Existing technologies • Evaluations • Conclusion

  3. 1. Introducing the problem B2B B2B Mediumenterprises Big enterprises B2B B2B B2B Global electronicmarketplace Smallenterprises

  4. ebXML, XLANG, RosettaNet The main subject advantages disadvantages Multi-criteria decision model The most optimal solution !

  5. 2. Needs of the market • Effective descriptionof business processes, • Business process management, • Workflow automatization. B2B + global electronic market

  6. 3. Existing technologies Contracts / Contracts / ebXML CPA ebXML CPA agreements agreements Private Private XLANG XLANG BPML BPML process process WSFL WSFL Public Public collaborative collaborative WSCL WSCL process process ebXML BPSS ebXML BPSS RosettaNet RosettaNet End point End point WSEL WSEL description description Service ebXML CPP ebXML CPP description and WSDL WSDL transport binding

  7. Rate of business management 29% No initiative Early phase of evaluating BPM solutions 54% Final phase of development 4% Regular use of BPM software 12% 20 60 10 30 40 50

  8. ebXML Electronic Business eXtensible Markup Language

  9. Based on EDI experience, supported by OASIS and UN/CEFACT ebXML Mechanism for modeling business information and processes • Reliable and safe • communication • infrastructure • Architecture and implementation: • flexibility • interoperability of contents • according to standards

  10. ebXML security • Privacy • Authentication • Authorization • Integrity • Non-repudiation Elements of security

  11. Simple and effective ebXML summary Multilingual support Safety and security Cost reduction Suitable for companies of all sizes Accordingly with standards

  12. XLANG

  13. XLANG • for describing business processes inside the BizTalk initiative; • focused fully on public processes. • supports long-term operations and nesting.

  14. XLANG It’s main features include: • Behavior • Actions • Control flow • Correlations • Context • Service management • Port mapping enabling technology business imperative

  15. For public processes only XLANG Flexible Enables multiple roles in contracts Partly assured security and exception handling For long-term transactions

  16. RosettaNet

  17. RosettaNet compromise between EDI and SOAP • defines business processes • atomizes business processes • success/failure notification • offers general business models and documents Partner Interface Process

  18. RosettaNet Security features: • two-way SSL, • authentication, • digital signatures, • data encryption and • non-repudiation

  19. RosettaNet summary Universal tool for electronic exchange of business information – PIP Many supporting tools Mature architecture Safe interaction Suitable only for large industry

  20. 4. Evaluations • Criteria • Utility function • Decision model • Results

  21. Criteria Divided by areas:

  22. Basic features Technical features Criteria Security features Structural features • constructing and describing processes • collaboration and roles description • role and collaboration model • small / medium / big enterprises support 9% 8% 2% 10%

  23. Basic features Technical features Criteria Security features • complexity and effort • efficiency • maturity • tools support • synchronous communication support • asynchronous communication support • independency from communication protocols • quality of service Structural features 9% 7% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% 6%

  24. Basic features Technical features Criteria Security features Structural features • authentication • authorization • integrity • encryption • non-repudiation • exception handling 3% 3% 5% 3% 4% 6%

  25. Basic features Technical features Criteria Security features Structural features • claim detection • data transformation 2 % 7%

  26. Utility function • u = maximum utility, • uj = utility of alternative j, • ci = criteria i, • Aj = alternative j (ebXML,XLANG,RosettaNet), • wi = weight of criterion i, • N = total number of alternatives.

  27. Decision model

  28. Results Advantages Disadvantages • Support for all • kinds of companies ebXML • Young technology • Maturity • Low complexity and • needed effort • Independency • Inflexibility • No exception handling RosettaNet • No quality of service • No authentication • No non-repudiation • Data transformation XLANG

  29. 5. Conclusion • Increasing need for suitable technologies for enabling electronic business and atomization • The most optimal technology for most of the companies is probably ebXML – however, only by our set of weighted criteria

  30. Questions?

More Related