1 / 17

Level 3 – why is progress so slow?

Level 3 – why is progress so slow?. Hilary Steedman Centre for Economic Performance London School of Economics and Political Science. Level 3 – why it matters. OECD claims that Level 3 is the minimum required for productive labour market participation in globalised post-industrial economies

lee-hewitt
Télécharger la présentation

Level 3 – why is progress so slow?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Level 3 – why is progress so slow? Hilary Steedman Centre for Economic Performance London School of Economics and Political Science

  2. Level 3 – why it matters OECD claims that Level 3 is the minimum required for productive labour market participation in globalised post-industrial economies Research on UK labour market shows that wage returns to qualifications below Level 3 are negligible and sometimes negative

  3. Government targets for 2000- how near in 2004? • By age 19 85% at Level 2 or above • By age 19 75% to achieve Level 2 in communication, numeracy and IT • By age 21 60% to achieve Level 3 or above

  4. International comparisons – a look at progress since 1994 • The countries chosen for comparison are France, Germany, Singapore and the US • France, Germany and the US all have higher productivity levels per hour worked than the UK • Singapore is an ‘Asian tiger’ with very rapid economic growth and GDP per worker close to European levels • Since we know that skills are an important part of the explanation of productivity levels and growth, these comparisons help us to understand where we may need to improve

  5. This presentation draws upon research papers prepared at the Centre for Economic Performance at the London School of Economics as part of the Skills for All Research Programme These and other papers in the programme are available at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/research/skills/skillsforall.asp International Comparisons of Qualifications: Skills Audit Update DfES Research Report No. 548 Using Pseudo Cohorts to Track Changes in the Qualifications of National Populations DfES Research Report No. 621 available at http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR621.pdf

  6. Proportions of 25-28 year olds at Level 2 or higher Source: International Comparisons of Qualifications: Skills Audit Update

  7. The race is not always to the fastest...... • Other countries, particularly Germany, had relatively modest qualification levels at 19-21 because their young people take longer to gain a qualification • By contrast, in the UK, our qualification rates, particularly at Level 3 and above, improve very little after young people reach the age of 21. This puts us well behind other countries when we look at older age groups • After age 30 few countries achieve much growth – the UK achieves slightly more than France and Germany but not enough to catch up

  8. Proportions of cohorts born 1970-1972 at Level 2 or higher Source: Using Pseudo Cohorts to Track Changes in the Qualifications of National Populations

  9. Proportions of cohorts born 1970-1972 at Level 3 or higher Source: Using Pseudo Cohorts to Track Changes in the Qualifications of National Populations

  10. Population aged 25-28 by level and type of qualification held Level 3+ Level 2+ Source: International Comparisons of Qualifications: Skills Audit Update

  11. Labour market value of Level 3 vocational qualifications We now look at how a Level 3 qualification affects the wages of individuals who also follow an apprenticeship training – in particular whether the investment made in gaining a Level 3 award by an individual offers on average a worthwhile financial return Research quoted is:The Returns to Apprenticeship TrainingAuthor(s): Steven McIntosh (CEP) Full text available in the form of a free pdf document at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/research/skills/Skills_Publications/default.asp

  12. Wage Returns to Apprenticeship, NVQ 3 Qualifications and a Combination of the Two, Males, 1996-2002

  13. Labour market value of Level 3 vocational qualifications Our research also investigated the employment probabilities of the 20 per cent of young people who claim they left school with no qualifications the relevant paper is The Impact of Vocational Qualifications on the Labour Market Outcomes of Low-Achieving School-LeaversSteven McIntosh (CEP) Full text available in the form of a free pdf document at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/research/skills/Skills_Publications/default.asp

  14. Subsequent Qualification Acquisition by Level of School Attainment, Males and Females Aged 22-29, 2002

  15. Policy implications • How can achievement rates for qualifications at Levels 2 and 3 in post-16 education and training be improved - participation is not enough? • How can we get the message across to young people that there are big rewards to vocational Level 3 - and that it keeps options for further career development open? • How can numbers gaining Level 3 qualifications through apprenticeship and in other vocational courses – in particular the new Specialised Diploma be increased? • What can be done to encourage those in work to gain Level 3 qualifications in the workplace? • What can be done to encourage young people to take advantage of finance and facilities available to young people to continue working towards a Level 3 qualification after the age of 21?

More Related