240 likes | 367 Vues
This workshop presentation by Eudokia Balamou at the University of Patras focused on the application of a bi-regional Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model, RURMOD-E, to evaluate the effects of rural development policies. Emphasizing sensitivity analysis, the study explored the implications of varying elasticity parameters and closure rules on simulation results. Key findings indicated that while significant quantitative effects were noted, qualitative changes in the direction of impacts remained limited. The conclusion stressed the importance of carefully selecting closure rules and elasticities relevant to the specific study region.
E N D
Demonstration of capabilities of a bi-regional CGE model to assess impacts of rural development policies (RURMOD-E) Demonstration WorkshopBrussels, 26.11.2008
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS- ROBUSTNESS Eudokia Balamou Department of Economics University of Patras
Introduction Two important issues in CGE models: • How the equilibrium relationships are obtained (elasticities) quantify how production, consumption, etc. adjust to altered economic conditions • How the model is closed (closure rules) reflect assumptions on how markets operate However choice of elasticities and closure rules • have no effect on the calibration of the models • have a considerable effect on simulation results
Introduction Sensitivity analysis is needed to test for the robustness of the findings Question to be answered: • Are results affected by small or large amounts? • Does the distribution of effects change? • in terms of direction of impacts • in terms of distribution of effects across rural-urban space
Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity Analysis: • Change of labour markets Archanes-Heraklion Keynesian labor market District Bruntal Neoclassical labor market • Double the level of Armington elasticities Presentation of results for 2 scenarios: • Soft modulation • RDM-AGRI (Axes 1, 2)ultural Centered RD Measures
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Labor Closure Archanes - Heraklion GDP at factor Cost
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Labor Closure Archanes – Heraklion: Domestic Production Archanes – Heraklion: Producer Prices
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Labor Closure Archanes – Heraklion: Factor Income
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Labor Closure What did the sensitivity analysis on closure rules show? • In some cases there is a change of sign from + to – • GDP urban sectors from RDM-AGRI (Axes 1, 2) scenario • Domestic Production secondary-tertiary prod. (only RDM-AGRI (Axes 1, 2)) • Factor Income Skill Labor and Capital from both scenarios • No significant changes in terms of the magnitude of effects
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Labor Closure District Bruntal GDP at factor Cost
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Labor Closure District Bruntal: Domestic Production District Bruntal: Producer Prices
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Labor Closure District Bruntal: Factor Income
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Labor Closure What did the sensitivity analysis on closure rules show? • No changes in sign in the case of the GDP • Changes in sign in the case of the SOFTMOD in domestic production and in Urban Unskilled and Skilled Labor and Urban Land Housing. • No significant changes in terms of the magnitude of effects
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Elasticities Archanes - Heraklion GDP at factor Cost
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Elasticities Archanes – Heraklion: Domestic Production Archanes – Heraklion: Producer Prices
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Elasticities Archanes – Heraklion: Factor Income
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Elasticities What did the sensitivity analysis on elasticities? • In some cases there is a change of sign but this are very limited (only in GDP and factor income) • No significant changes in terms of the magnitude of effects
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Elasticities District Bruntal GDP at factor Cost
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Elasticities District Bruntal: Domestic Production District Bruntal: Producer Prices
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Elasticities District Bruntal: Factor Income
Results of Sensitivity Analysis-Elasticities What did the sensitivity analysis on elasticities? • No significant changes in terms of sign • No significant changes in terms of the magnitude of effects
Conclusions • Sensitivity analysis was carried out to test for the robustness of the findings • Policy simulations were repeated assuming • different labor market closure rules (Keynesian vs. Neoclassical) • double the levels of Armington elasticities • Both models are a little bit sensitive in term of change in labor market closure rule especially for GDP and factor income.
Conclusions • Both models not sensitive to changes in elasticities: the results were affected but by small amounts and there were no qualitative changes in terms of direction of impacts or distribution of effects across rural-urban space. • Need to be very careful when it comes to the choice of closure rules and elasticities • Closure rules must be suitable for the study region in order to reflex the “correct” results