1 / 25

Emergency and Risk Communication Margo Edmunds, Charles Fulwood, Shane Harris, and John Parker

Emergency and Risk Communication Margo Edmunds, Charles Fulwood, Shane Harris, and John Parker . Emergency Management Communications Track: 3.07 National Emergency Management Summit, Washington, DC February 4, 2008. Affiliations and Disclosures.

lel
Télécharger la présentation

Emergency and Risk Communication Margo Edmunds, Charles Fulwood, Shane Harris, and John Parker

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emergency and Risk CommunicationMargo Edmunds, Charles Fulwood, Shane Harris, and John Parker Emergency Management Communications Track: 3.07 National Emergency Management Summit, Washington, DC February 4, 2008

  2. Affiliations and Disclosures • Margo Edmunds, Ph.D.: VP, The Lewin Group and JHU Communications Program • Charles Fulwood, Partner, MediaVision USA, and JHU Communications Program • Shane Harris, National Journal • John Parker, M.D., FACS, FCCP, Senior Vice President, Technical Fellow, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)

  3. About Today’s Session • Interactive • Multi-disciplinary approach • Review national preparedness policy framework • Key principles of crisis communications • Rapid response: accuracy and credibility • Advance planning • Message development and framing: Know your audience • Practical tips on working with the media

  4. Role of Government in Emergency Preparedness • DHS - National Response Framework • HHS • State • Local • Regional and online networks • National associations of government officials (NEMA, NGA, etc.)

  5. Role of Private Sector • ESF: Industry/critical infrastructure • Hospitals and clinics • Schools • Employers • Voluntary response teams • Individuals and families • Communities

  6. Role of the Media in Emergency Response • Get accurate info out fast • Help inform public about what is happening, what to expect • Inform the public about what to do, how, and when • Frequent updates of vital information to promote ongoing situational awareness • Role in recovery: learn what happened and how to fix it

  7. Katrina Evacuees in Houston • Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation Survey, September 10-12, 2005 • 680 men and women in Houston shelter • 93% were African-American • 76% had children under 18 with them • 52% had been employed full time • 52% were uninsured • 43% were on a daily medication • 46% had a working cell phone

  8. Katrina Evacuees cont’d • 38% were physically unable to leave or were caring for someone physically unable to leave • 34% were trapped in their homes and had to be rescued • 40% spent at least one day outside on freeway or underpass • 68% thought the government would have responded faster “if more of them had been wealthier and white”

  9. A Case Study: Anthrax • The incident (summary) • The players • The facts • The communication • The execution • Continuity of Operation (COOP) (USG) • The autopsy of the incident • What went right • What went wrong • What we learned

  10. The National Response Plan • The National Response – (Federal, State, Local) Framework • INTENT - Why it was developed? • IMPLICATION - Why it is important? • Sovereignty • Public sector coordination • Private sector coordination and organizational responsibilities • Where are we? – Where are we going? • WHY is communication important (CRITICAL)?

  11. HSPD - 10 HSPD - 18 HSPD - 21 What are the themes of these Homeland Security Presidential Directives? Will they be effective? Homeland Security Presidential Directives (HSPD)Methods of Communication

  12. Emergency and Risk Communications 2.0 • Rapid and accurate response • Frequent updates • Credible spokesperson (s) • Authoritative but empathetic • Contingencies and multiple channels of communications • Appropriate media for different audiences • One message, multiple vehicles • Trust among all parties

  13. Communicating Risk with Diverse Communities • Mainstream media coverage • Role of ethnic media • Television • Radio • Print (weeklies) • Digital media • Language and cultural issues • Language-locked communities • Katrina: “refugees” or “evacuees”

  14. A Case Study: NYC MTA • “If you see something, say something” campaign • Message success or message failure? • NYT, January 7, 2008: 1,944 calls to transit hotline • Number of arrests 18 • Number of terrorists 0 • Reports about people counting 11

  15. What You Can Do • Build partnerships with ethnic media • Include ethnic media in distribution lists • Hold briefings • Meet with Editorial Boards, publishers • Develop editorial memoranda and policy updates • Include in public education campaigns

  16. Working Journalist’s Perspective on Media • Media as primary source of information for the public during an emergency • Need for agencies and organizations to have a prescribed set of procedures for the press • Briefing locations • Contact information and preferred mode • Who’s in charge of on-site response

  17. Building Relationships • Officials should cultivate relationships with journalists who will be covering emergencies • Good model: the military • Relationships help get good information out fast • Improves understanding of government roles and leads to better coverage

  18. Feeding the Media • Important to provide as much information as possible • Correct mistakes promptly • Honest mistakes • Confusion is part of the nature of emergencies, especially in the beginning

  19. Breaking News v. Longer Coverage • Officials focus on television journalists and print reporters for major dailies • Should also involve magazine writers • More in-depth coverage • Help provide context and shape understanding of the event • “Lessons learned” perspective

  20. The Case for Now • Public trust: easy to lose, hard to keep • Trust between government and media: objectivity is priceless • Time between incidents is critical • Overcome daily deadline culture • Raise awareness that risks are real • Give people the right information and tools to prepare

  21. References and Resources • Aspen Institute, 2006. First Informers in the Disaster Zone: The Lessons of Katrina. www.aspeninstitute.org/atf/cf • Neuman, W. In Response to M.T.A.’s “Say Something” Ads, a Glimpse of Modern Fears. The New York Times, January 7, 2008.

  22. References and Resources • R. Morin and L. Rein. Some of the Uprooted Won’t Go Home Again. Washington Post, A1, Friday, September 16, 2005. • Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard University. Survey of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees. September 2005. www.kff.org/newsmedia/7401.cfm

  23. Questions?

  24. For More Information • Margo.Edmunds@lewin.com • Cfulwood@mediavisionusa.net • Sharris@nationaljournal.com • John.S.Parker@saic.com

More Related