1 / 30

Hydrogen Lines in DA White Dwarfs: Improved Stark Broadening

Hydrogen Lines in DA White Dwarfs: Improved Stark Broadening. Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay & Pierre Bergeron Université de Montréal. E. -. +. Hydrogen-line (DA) white dwarfs. Spectroscopic Technique : Bergeron et al. (1992). Photosphere at 20,000 K.

len
Télécharger la présentation

Hydrogen Lines in DA White Dwarfs: Improved Stark Broadening

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hydrogen Lines in DA White Dwarfs: Improved Stark Broadening Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay & Pierre BergeronUniversité de Montréal E - +

  2. Hydrogen-line (DA) white dwarfs

  3. Spectroscopic Technique : Bergeron et al. (1992)

  4. Photosphere at 20,000 K

  5. Mihalas, Hummer & Däppen 1988Occupation probability formalism

  6. Mihalas, Hummer & Däppen1988Occupation probability formalism T=10,000 K T=20,000 K charged - neutral

  7. W WD0205+250"old models" priorto 1992

  8. Mike Seaton (1990) : MHD88 effects should also be included in line profiles calculations. Bergeron (1993) : ad-hoc parameter, used in all codes (TLUSTY) VCS βcritx2

  9. Stark Broadening - Hydrogen

  10. + + Constant Electric FieldLinear Stark Effect - + + + +

  11. Microfield Distribution β=E/Eo P(β)dβ MHD88 : Holtsmark Nayfonov (1999) : Hooper

  12. r=Rdebye Vidal, Cooper & Smith (1973)Lemke (1997) v Ψ(H) e- ρ Constant Electric FieldLinear Stark Effect H Ψ(e) r=Rmin

  13. Non-adiabatic quantum calculations n=5 n=4 electronic collisions no-quenching n=3 n=2 n=1 t

  14. V(r) + qEz Hydrogen Atom : V(r) V(z) V(z) z z Saddle point ΔE Energy of Nth level

  15. Mihalas, Hummer & Däppen 1988Occupation probability formalism Bound state Free State ΔE

  16. βcrit value not arbitrary! Βcrit }electronic collisions

  17. Seaton (1990) High Fields Low Fields Seaton (1990) : first non-ideal profiles using approximate electronic broadening profiles Bergeron (1993) : ad-hoc parameter.

  18. This work • Vidal, Cooper & Smith (1973) electron broadening theory. • Non-ideal correction for proton perturbations (MHD 88, Seaton 90).

  19. This work • Non-ideal correction for electron perturbations (MHD 88). • It accounts for about 10% of the non-ideal effects. • Consistent implementation of the MHD88 Theory.

  20. VCSThis WorkM. Seaton (Lemke 1997) T=10,000 K Log Ne =17

  21. Wiese et al. (1972)

  22. 0.7 M 0.55 M 0.7 M 0.55 M

  23. 0.7 M 0.55 M 0.7 M 0.55 M

  24. ΔTeff =+100 KΔlog g = +0.06

  25. HZ43 GD71 This work VCS βcritx2

  26. Independent constraints

  27. 40 Eri B

  28. Conclusion • Spectroscopic technique (Bergeron et al. 1992). • Current model atmospheres use MHD88 EOS and VCS Stark broadening profiles (Lemke 1997 tables) • Here we add MHD88 inside the VCS broadening theory in a consistent way for the first time. • We are currently looking at further implications at low and high Teff, UV lines and DO white dwarfs.

More Related