1 / 12

Throw Me Something Mister….

Throw Me Something Mister…. Gathering & Applying Useful Data that makes a difference at the Local Level. The Problems Prior to Implementation. Perkins Core Indicators were hard to translate value and meaning at Local or Regional levels No Primary Data for Louisiana Tech Prep

leola
Télécharger la présentation

Throw Me Something Mister….

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Throw Me Something Mister…. Gathering & Applying Useful Data that makes a difference at the Local Level

  2. The Problems Prior to Implementation • Perkins Core Indicators were hard to translate value and meaning at Local or Regional levels • No Primary Data for Louisiana Tech Prep • Consuming paperwork process with limited purpose and feedback

  3. The Goals to Improve the Tech Prep Story • Keep it Simple • Make it Useful • Require Use through the Local Application Process (LAP) • Provide opportunities to Shine

  4. Develop An Outside Partnership • Credible Independent Authority • Outside perspective combined with strong knowledge base of comparable programs • Related data developed through School-to-Work

  5. Identify Critical Questions • What indications are there that Louisiana Tech Prep Program is addressing its mission and goals? • What indications are there that Regional Consortia are addressing their respective goals and related objectives as stated in their LAPS?

  6. Critical Questions Continued • What issues or concerns have been identified at this time that warrant additional consideration by state and local Tech Prep administrators as they pursue the purposes of Tech Prep in Louisiana?

  7. Chronology • Director/Evaluation Team Understanding of Evaluation Needs • Evaluation Team Drafts of Documents • Consortia Meeting to Review Drafts

  8. Chronology Continued • Revised Documents and Procedures “Shared” • Identification of Evaluation as a Dynamic Process • Adopt/Adapt/Terminate Process Components

  9. Tools for the Tasks(Keep It Simple) • Tech Prep Evaluation Guide Forms • Consortium Data Page • Articulation Summary Matrix • Business/Industry Involvement • Consortium Activity Report

  10. Site Visits – A Chance to SHINE! • Site Visit Protocol • Visitor Protocol • Lessons Learned

  11. Findings • Master Key Findings • Individual Site Key Findings • The Information that we could not have received any other way….

  12. Questions??? • Contact: • Kelley Rhoe-Collins, kcollins@lctcs.state.us • Dr. Charles Gifford, cgifford@uno.edu • Carol Short, cshort2@uno.edu

More Related