SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Effective Evidence Gathering for Educator Evaluations: Strategies and Examples

leon avatar
leon
9 diapositives · 247 Views · Jul 15, 2014

This session focuses on the essential types of evidence required for educator evaluations, highlighting the three main categories and their concrete examples. Participants will learn how to identify and utilize appropriate tools and processes for gathering and organizing evidence, as well as how to align evidence with educational standards and indicators. Through collaborative activities, attendees will create a fictitious binder that represents their evaluation evidence, enhancing understanding of the Massachusetts educator evaluation system.

Effective Evidence Gathering for Educator Evaluations: Strategies and Examples - slide 1
01 / 9Effective Evidence Gathering for Educator Evaluations: Strategies and Examples
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Effective Evidence Gathering for Educator Evaluations: Strategies and Examples
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Educator Evaluation Gathering Evidence

  2. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: • Explain the three types of evidence required by regulations, and identify concrete examples of each. • Identify tools and processes for gathering and organizing evidence. • Organize evidence into appropriate Standards and Indicators • We will create a fictitious binder today Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  3. Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process. Every educator and evaluator collects evidence and assesses progress Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  4. Implementation Responsibility • Educator responsibilities: • Identifying, collecting, and organizing artifacts/evidence related to goal progress • Documenting action steps completed • Collecting and submitting common artifacts • Collecting and submitting evidence related to Standards III and IV • Evaluator responsibilities: • Making resources and supports available • Observing practice and providing regular and specific feedback on performance • Monitoring progress—including midpoint check-ins • Help with organizing and analyzing evidence over time Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  5. Sources of Evidence for Summative Ratings • Three categories of evidence must be collected for each educator: • Multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement • Judgments based on observations and artifacts of professional practice • Additional evidence relevant to standards • This includes evidence collected by the educator and shared with the evaluator relating to fulfilling Standard III: Family and Community Engagement and Standard IV: Professional Culture from the Model System Teacher Rubric Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  6. What does this look like? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  7. Importance of Strategically Collecting Artifacts • Artifacts should be a sample that demonstrates educator performance and impact: • Aligned with educator goals, the Model System Teacher Rubric, and school goals • Number of artifacts to collect varies by educator • Artifacts can provide evidence of more than one Standard or Indicator Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  8. Strategies for Collecting Artifacts • Identify common artifacts that all or most educators will be expected to collect (e.g., unit plans, student work) • Today we will share examples of high-quality, valuable evidence during faculty or team meetings: Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  9. Identifying Evidence in Artifacts • Within your school team, divide into fours or teams. • Each team will do the following: • Review one set of artifacts. • Complete the Artifact Cover Page for artifacts. • Designate which standard and indicator is represented by the artifact • Consider these questions: • After reviewing these artifacts, where would you place these artifacts? • What might you want to know about this teacher’s practice? • What would you want to ask this teacher? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education