1 / 25

Magnetic Measuring Facility (MMF) Outline

Magnetic Measuring Facility (MMF) Outline. Organizational Chart-Stakeholders Scope, Facility Design Criteria, User’s Requirements and Layout Previous Work Status to Date (Site Preparation, Title II and Title III) Budget and Schedule Technical Challenges (Risks) ES&H Issues

leroychandler
Télécharger la présentation

Magnetic Measuring Facility (MMF) Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Magnetic Measuring Facility (MMF) Outline • Organizational Chart-Stakeholders • Scope, Facility Design Criteria, User’s Requirements and Layout • Previous Work • Status to Date (Site Preparation, Title II and Title III) • Budget and Schedule • Technical Challenges (Risks) • ES&H Issues • Management Challenges • Path Forward

  2. Stakeholders • Magnetic Measurement Facility (MMF) • Robert Ruland – Alignment Manager • Zachary Wolf – Facility Manager • ConventionalFacilities-WBS 1.09 • David Saenz – CF Manager • Jim Welch – CF Systems Physicist • Javier A. Sevilla-CF Project Engineer/CAM (Mar-07-05) • Jo Beth Folger-CF Engineer • Phil Cutino-CEF Interface-Controls • Richard Hislop – Construction Safety • Michael Scharfestein-ES&H LCLS • Anita Malahowski –Cost/Schedule • Bruce Patten – Contracts • Jesse Saldivar – CF Technical Assistance

  3. Scope • Site Preparation (Electrical Feeder, Relocations, Etc) • Space for Labs (MM, CMM), Storage, Cradle and Office • Electrical, Mechanical, Structural (Isolation slabs), Fire Protection and Interiors • Data and Voice Wiring • Excludes: Test Benches, Experimental Equipment, Racks, Magnetic Measuring Instruments

  4. Facility Design Requirements • Technical Note LCLS-TN-04-1(Feb-09-04) https://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/lcls/lcls_tech_notes.html • Space Requirements • Environmental Stability (3 areas) • Space Temperature: ± 0.1 °C short term may go up to 0.3°C if < 1Hr • Relative Humidity: 45%± 5% • Other areas: ±1°C and ±2.5°C • Vibration <0.5 microns-MM Lab • Utility Requirements: • Electrical (new 800A feeder MMFBuilding Upgrade) • Other (Compressed Air and small Chiller for User’s equipment)

  5. MMF Facility Uses • Undulator magnet tuning – 2 magnet measuring machine test stands • Aligned with same orientation to Earth’s magnetic field as LCLS Undulator Hall. • Undulator fiducialization – large Coordinate Measuring Machine-CMM • Cradle assembly area • Magnet storage/temperature acclimation • Work desks in lab and office space for 2 employees

  6. Resultant Building Criteria • ~4,800 sq. ft. floor space (inc. ~3,000 laboratory space, mech Rm) + mezzanine 1,400 sf (HVAC & Electrical) • Locate within an existing building to aid in temperature control • Adequate ceiling height for overhead cranes • Accessible for magnet delivery using trucks and forklifts • New Electrical Service – 800A, 480v, 3Ø

  7. Building 081 Location @SLAC 280 LCLS Undulator Hall Research Yard LINAC 280 NORTH PEP Ring Road

  8. Building 081 Site Plan Front Rear HazMat

  9. Building 081 Current Uses ~25 Ft height STORES Interior View

  10. New Space Allocation for Bldg. 081 Front (N) Fire Alarm Panel (N) MCC-B081 Offices SHIPPING & RECEIVING VEHICLE SHOP STORES MMF EQUIPMENT REPAIR Rear

  11. MMF Ground Floor Plan HVAC Zoning ± 0.1°C, 45%RH ±5 Coordinate Measuring Area ~ 1,000 ft. sq. Magnet Measuring Lab (MM) ~1,800 ft. sq. Cradle Assembly Area ~325 ft. sq. Magnet Loading and Storage ~850 ft. sq. ± 1°C, 45% RH ±5 Mechanical Room ~256 ft. sq. ± 2.5°C Rear

  12. Mezzanine Floor Plan Equipment Room Equipment: 4 Air handling Units 1 Motor Control Center, 2 Transformers 3 Electrical Panels, HVAC Control Panel Mezzanine for Mechanical/Electrical Equipment in Conditioned Space MCC-MMF Rear

  13. Rear Elevation-MMF, B081 Mezzanine Louver for Equipment Access Access to Mechanical Rooms Staff Access Roll up Door (14’) for Magnets delivery

  14. User’s Layout (By R. Ruland, Oct, 2004) • Floor plan divided into three functional areas • Magnetic Measurements (± 0.1º C) • Fiducialization and Assembly (± 1º C) • Storage (± 2.5º C) • Test stand lay-out is driven by requirement to match the Earth Magnetic Field conditions in lab to Undulator Hall, i.e. azimuth and gap orientation need to be identical

  15. Previous Work • Title I Drawings and Specifications –Completed by JE • External Review October 14, 2004 • Report with recommendations • Internal reviews (SLAC) • Facility’s User (Metrology Group) • 50% and 100% drawings and Specs: • ES&H, Citizen’s Committees • Conventional Experimental Facilities Dept (CEF) old SEM

  16. Status • Title II Drawings and Specifications –prepared by JE • Issued for Construction-March 11, 05 • Completed: Review and “Final” approval by SLAC’ Citizens Committees and ES&H- Obtained approval 4-26-05 • Site Preparation Work (activities delayed) • Resources allocation Accident related ->Conventional Experimental Facilities (CEF) support • On-going: Design and coordination (New Storage Carousel, Relocation of Shelving and Haz Material storage, move occupants, New electrical feeder (12.4kV) to building, New Fire Alarm System and Data network upgrade) • Title III • Procurement: Pre-selection based on MOR rate, safety record, frequency and severity of accidents and final selection is based on a “criteria”- Award: Best Value • Implement design of Drawings and Specifications • Develop and Implement a “Commissioning” plan for Mechanical, Electrical and Controls systems • Beneficial Occupancy: Feb’06

  17. Drawings & Specifications, March 11, 05

  18. Budget & Schedule • Title III • Including Site Preparation $2.09M • (Excludes: Upgrade Building Fire Alarm and Some Relocation costs) • Bidding and Award (April – June 2005) • Site Visit: April 7, 2005 • Bids received May 5 and Anticipated Award May 27, 2005 • Construction and Commissioning • Execution: Mid June 05 – February 06 • Beneficial Occupancy to Project Office Feb-06 (Level 4, Milestone)

  19. Schedule P3-Integrated with Overall Project

  20. Cost Estimate- WBS1.09.03.02 • Estimated Total Construction Cost $2.09M • Construction Subcontract: $ 1,536 K (by JE) • Bids received: $2.35M (Evaluation to follow) • Site Preparation & Electrical LLP: $ 550K • Allocated Contingency for Construction: 30%

  21. Risks • Internal technical:Not Achieving the Tight Temperature and Stability requirements • Plan:Design Reviews, Constructability, Compliance with Documents and Specifications and implementation of Commissioning Plan • Internal non-technical:Delays in the BO date • Plan:Use and implement Good and effective Project Management Practices, Project Controls and select only “Qualified” General Contractors including critical subs (E, M, C) • Internal non-technical:Accidents • Plan: Pre-qualification and selection of contractors based on MOD rate, safety record, New Rules for Subcontractor’s Oversight, Strict Implementation and Close Monitoring of Safety Hazards Analysis, IIPP and Safety Procedures (fall protection, electrical, etc)

  22. ES&H Issues • Demolition activities • Site Preparation: Excavation • Excavation Permit for Relocation of Haz Mat Storage was obtained • Sampling of soil by ES&H • Air quality-BAAQMD-not applicable • Construction Activity Hazards • Construction Safety oversight by LCLS Safety Manager, LCLS Divisional ES&H Coordinator, SLAC Safety OSHA Inspectors and by SLAC trained UTR. • Subcontractors will be required to staff project with a Construction Safety Coordinator-whenever work is being performed • Includes preparation of Pre-work Hazard Analysis, Job Hazard Analysis and Mitigation (JHAM) and all applicable DOE and Federal Safety Regulations. • Radiation • None • Hoisting/Rigging • Citizens’ Committee and/or Hoisting/Rigging inspector will review and approve the Subcontractor’s Rigging Plan for the testing, commissioning and acceptance of new cranes

  23. Management Challenges • Cost/Schedule Risks • Cost estimate based on Jacobs estimate– confirmation when bids are received from Subcontractors (Factors: Market conditions, Qualification Criteria and NEW Safety Requirements, Inaccurate JE estimate). • Schedule • Coordination and Support from other SLAC’s Departments (ES&H, Stores, CEF) (Limited resources) • SLAC policy changes in the wake of 10/11/04 electrical accident are still being developed. (UTR responsibilities and Authority, and New/Updated Regulations for Oversight of Sub-Contractors, New Training Requirements for Subcontractors, etc.)

  24. Path Forward • Enforce Safety Regulations to All Sub-Contractors • Implement Criteria Selection for Bidding and Construction to ALL Sub-Contractors • Coordinate and Complete ALL Site Preparation activities • Management and Lab support • Execute Construction and Commissioning • Schedule and Cost Controls • Strict compliance with Drawings and Specifications • Execute an integrated verification plan including: User education, testing of operational performance, complete documentation (manuals, drawings, etc.) and training of LCLS/SLAC personnel who will operate and maintain (CEF) this Facility

  25. Summary • Organizational Chart • Scope, Facility Design Criteria, User’s Requirements and Layout • Previous Work • Status to Date (Site preparation, Title II and Title III) • Budget and Schedule • Technical Challenges (Risks) • ES&H Issues • Management Challenges • Path Forward

More Related