1 / 65

George Mason School of Law

George Mason School of Law. Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu. Next (last) day. Finish Remedies chapter Scott 1001-36. The measure of damages.

lester-hunt
Télécharger la présentation

George Mason School of Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

  2. Next (last) day • Finish Remedies chapter • Scott 1001-36

  3. The measure of damages • If damages are meant to compensate the innocent party for the wrong done him, what is the wrong when the other party breaches? • Failure to perform: Expectation damages • Inviting detrimental reliance: reliance damages

  4. The measure of damages • When would the Π prefer reliance damages?

  5. The measure of damages • When would the Π prefer reliance damages? • Whenever these exceed the expectation award

  6. The measure of damages • When would the Π prefer reliance damages? • Whenever these exceed the expectation award • Limits on expectation damages • Uncertainty • Foreseeability • Or bad bargains?

  7. The measure of damages • When would the Π prefer reliance damages? • Whenever these exceed the expectation award • Should the Π have the option in such cases?

  8. Freund • What are the three kinds of damages that are considered? • The Expectation Interest • The Reliance Interest • Semble not to exceed the expectation interest, or else a windfall

  9. The measure of damages • When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

  10. The measure of damages • When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? • Contracts with Physicians • Hawkins v. McGee 892

  11. The measure of damages • When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? • Contracts with Physicians • Hawkins v. McGee

  12. The measure of damages • When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? • Contracts with Physicians • Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor?

  13. The measure of damages • When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? • Contracts with Physicians • Hawkins v. McGee • Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor? • What would the two measures give? • What difference in pain and suffering claims?

  14. The measure of damages • When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? • Contracts with Physicians • Hawkins v. McGee • Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor? • What would the two measures give? • What would restitution give?

  15. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster 896 Robert Stack as Eliot Ness

  16. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster • The FBI attracted college graduate to work as clerical staff because of the possibility of receiving preferential consideration as special agents • The FBI stopped the program in 1977 because (1) they weren’t getting qualified people, and (2) the FBI wanted to institute an affirmative action program.

  17. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster • So what do you think of the takings argument?

  18. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster • So what do you think of the takings argument? • Reversed on appeal

  19. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster • So what do you think of the takings argument? • If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

  20. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster • So what do you think of the takings argument? • If it would succeed, what kind of damages? • What are the problems with expectation damages?

  21. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster • So what do you think of the takings argument? • If it would succeed, what kind of damages? • What are the problems with expectation damages? • Uncertainty • FBI’s right to terminate

  22. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster • So what do you think of the takings argument? • If it would succeed, what kind of damages? • Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages?

  23. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster • So what do you think of the takings argument? • If it would succeed, what kind of damages? • Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages? • Yes—but no proof that a bad bargain.

  24. The measure of damages • Kizas v. Webster • So what do you think of the takings argument? • If it would succeed, what kind of damages? • Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages? • So what they get is the difference between what they received as FBI employees (and for a year afterwards) and what they would have received in the labor market, plus dislocation

  25. Anglia v. Reed 902 Robert Reed, The Brady Bunch

  26. Anglia v. Reed • What was the problem with expectation damages?

  27. Anglia v. Reed • What was the problem with expectation damages? • If expectation damages are speculative, could any reliance damages be awarded?

  28. Anglia v. Reed • What was the problem with expectation damages? • If expectation damages are speculative, could any reliance damages be awarded? • Both pre- and post-contract reliance damages awarded

  29. Restitution • The forms of action: • Trespass • Action on the case • Negligence • Assumpsit • Quasi Contract • Money had and received

  30. Restitution or Unjust Enrichment • A general principle of restitution out of Quasi Contract, Money had and received, breach of fiduciary duty • Based on Δ’s unjust retention of a benefit as against Π, and not on Π’s reliance losses.

  31. Restitution: General Principles • Suppose that, without asking you permission, I put orange aluminum siding on your house. Can I recover the cost of doing do from you?

  32. Restitution • Bailey v. West p. 5 • What should the Πs have done with the horse?

  33. Restitution • Bailey v. West p. 5 • What should the Πs have done with the horse? • Restitutionary remedies are available in spite of or in the absence of consent—but not if the Π is an officious intermeddler

  34. Restitution • Bailey v. West p. 5 • What should the Πs have done with the horse? • Restitutionary remedies are available in spite or the absence of consent—but not if the Π is an officious intermeddler • If not, see Leebow at p. 911

  35. Restitution • Bailey v. West p. 5 • What should the Πs have done with the horse? • Restitutionary remedies are available in spite or the absence of consent—but not if the Π is an officious intermeddler • But that problem doesn’t arise when restitution is sought as a remedy in contract

  36. Zara Contracting 903 Tri-cities Airport, Endicott NY

  37. Zara Contracting • Zara contracts with US gov’t to build an airport • Zara subcontracts the entire job to Π • Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself.

  38. Zara Contracting • Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. • What can Π recover? • Value of work done at contract rate?

  39. Zara Contracting • Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. • What can Π recover? • Value of work done at contract rate? • Quantum meruitfor value of work done (more than contract rate as the work was harder than expected)?

  40. Zara Contracting • Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. • What can Π recover? • What was the benefit unjustly retained by Zara? • Is it unjust if the plaintiff is simply paid at the contract rate?

  41. Zara Contracting • Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. • What can Π recover? • Does it matter that the defendant was in breach? • Cf Restatement 373 • Palmer Construction 909

  42. Zara Contracting • Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. • What can Π recover? • Does it matter that the defendant was in breach? • Cf gloss added by Farash at 910

  43. Zara Contracting • The measure of recovery: • Extent to which defendant’s wealth is increased? • Amount defendant would have paid a third party for the work? • Zara’s recovery from the government of $17,115 for the extra work?

  44. Zara Contracting • The court thought that Restatement 347, comment c was triggered. Was it?

  45. Briton v. Turner 906 • Is there some reason why the no-breach rule should be waived here?

  46. Can restitution damages exceed expectation damages? • Britton v. Turner • Aliter a temptation to strategic behavior by the employer?

  47. Can restitution damages exceed expectation damages? • Britton v. Turner • Can the employer bargain around this?

  48. Do damages undercompensate? • The American rule of costs chills meritorious actions (and encourages frivolous ones) • Small dollar claims might not be brought

  49. Do damages undercompensate? • The American rule of costs chills meritorious actions (and encourages frivolous ones) • But class actions remedy this • And then some?

  50. Do damages undercompensate? • If they do, an argument for punitive damages?

More Related