190 likes | 310 Vues
This comprehensive analysis by Dr. Peter H. Gleick highlights the historical context of conflicts over freshwater resources and the growing risks tied to water scarcity amidst rising global demand. The paper explores the notion of water wars and the complex interplay between competition and cooperation over shared water resources, particularly in international river basins. Gleick emphasizes the importance of effective treaties, equitable water rights, and joint management initiatives in mitigating potential disputes, while advocating for strategies to enhance water efficiency and promote peaceful resolutions.
E N D
Water and International Security: Definitions, History, and Future Risks Dr. Peter H. Gleick www.pacinst.org Pacific Institute, Oakland, California Tufts University February 2005
Water and Conflict: Conclusions • There is a long history of conflicts over fresh water. • Such conflicts have taken many forms. • The risks of water-related disputes are growing. • But: water can also be a cause for cooperation, negotiation, and agreement.
Key Concepts and Issues • “Environmental Security” • Water and conflict • “Water Wars” • International Rivers • Shared watersheds/watercourses • Environmental agreements and treaties
Environment and Security • Outgrowth of the ending of the Cold War (mid-1980s); • Outgrowth of the improved understanding of environmental issues; • Marked by a rich, albeit cantankerous political science debate; • Water piece enriched by diverse case studies.
Water and Conflict:Critical Issues • Fresh water is widely shared internationally. • Half of all land area on Earth • Over 260 “international river basins” • There is growing competition for water. • Rising populations • Rising demand from all sectors • International efforts to resolve water-related disputes are often inadequate.
“Water Wars?” Or More Complex? • Water as a goal • Middle East (2700 BPE to present) • Water as a weapon • Han River, Korea; Ataturk Dam • Water systems as targets • WWII, Vietnam, Persian Gulf, Iraq • Water in development disputes • Apartheid SA, Cauvery River, Gabcikovo Chronology of water conflicts: www.worldwater.org
Number of International River Basins, by Continent Source: Wolf et al. 1999
Danube 18 Congo 13 Niger 11 Nile 10 Zambezi 9 Lake Chad 8 Aral Sea 8 Rhine 8 Amazon 8 Volta 6 Jordan 6 Mekong 6 Tigris/Euphrates 6 Kura-Araks 6 Ganges/Brahmaputra 5 Neman 5 Vistula/Wista 5 La Plata 5 Transboundary Rivers Shared by Five or More States
New Concerns/New Challenges? • Water and economic development: poverty, allocation. • Subnational, state-to-state, ethnic, local disputes are all increasingly common. • Water-related acts of terrorism.
Subnational Water Conflicts; Terrorism Vaal Dam, South Africa, DWAF Los Angeles Aqueduct, Alabama Gates Credit: G.D.Bain 1991 Meuse River
Reducing the Risks of Water Conflicts • Technical (scarcity) * • Improve efficiency of water use in all sectors • Explore new supply options • Economic (allocation) • Reduce water subsidies; re-evaluate rates • Re-evaluate agricultural policies • Institutional (management) • Joint basin management • Dispute resolution mechanisms • Political * • Effective and comprehensive joint agreements • Equitable water rights allocations and control
Political Approaches: Treaties • Many specific international river basin treaties, e.g., • The Nile (the Sudan and Egypt) • The Colorado (the U.S. and Mexico) • The Jordan (Israel and Jordan) • The Ganges/Brahmaputra (India and Bangladesh) • Mixed success; continued challenges
Political Approaches: General Principles of International Water Law • Obligation to Share Data • Obligation to Resolve Disputes Peacefully • Equitable Utilization of Water • Prevention of Significant Harm • Obligation to Notify and Inform • Cooperative Management UN Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (1997)
Conclusions: Water, Conflict, and Cooperation • There is a long history of both conflict and cooperation over fresh water resources. • New challenges are developing. • Will our abilities to reach agreement and cooperation keep pace with the developing challenges?
Dr. Peter H. Gleick www.pacinst.org Pacific Institute, Oakland, California See also: www.worldwater.org