1 / 28

Resources – Part 1 Understanding the Needs of CDF and D0 2005-2009

Resources – Part 1 Understanding the Needs of CDF and D0 2005-2009. Rob Roser FNAL. A bit of History…. HEPAP commissioned a manpower survey. To the experiments:

lila-bright
Télécharger la présentation

Resources – Part 1 Understanding the Needs of CDF and D0 2005-2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Resources – Part 1 Understanding the Needs of CDF and D02005-2009 Rob Roser FNAL

  2. A bit of History… • HEPAP commissioned a manpower survey. • To the experiments: • evaluate their needs in operations (carefully defined) and analysis (carefully defined) from 2004-2009 in faculty/staff, post docs, students treating 2004 as a census year, breaking out foreign and US • To the PI’s • evaluate their plans for faculty, Research Assoc., Post docs, graduate students for all projects from 2004-2009 under a severe, constant effort boundary condition Rob Roser, FNAL

  3. Summary Plot of Needs Rob Roser, FNAL

  4. “The Shot Heard Round the World” Rob Roser, FNAL

  5. Summary – as presented to HEPAP Rob Roser, FNAL

  6. Taking the Next Step… • Pier established a task force to understand and address potential staffing problems as pointed out in the HEPAP survey. • Comprised of 18 members • CDF and D0 management, (Spokes, online and offline leadership, Dept heads • FNAL Management; CD and PPD Division Heads • The committee divided itself into 4 subgroups • Resource Availability to CDF/D0 and perform “gap analysis”. • Detector Operations Needs • Offline Operations Needs • Physics and Algorithms Needs Rob Roser, FNAL

  7. Details • Subgroups had representation from both experiments as well as lab management • Each created lists of tasks and performed a detailed bottoms up estimate of the FTE’s required to operate • This talk is about subgroups 2,3,4 • Terry Wyatt will summarize the findings of subgroup 1. Rob Roser, FNAL

  8. Context of HEPAP Survey • CDF needs were based on FY04 • Identified the resources that were being deployed at that moment • projected those identical resources/mix through 2009 • D0 needs were based on individual effort reporting • Drill down’s good to 10% • CDF and D0 both assumed identical physics programs to what existed in FY04 in FY09 Rob Roser, FNAL

  9. HEPAP Survey was a Wake Up Call • Change in Strategy in examining resources required… • 2005-2009 broken up into two periods • Increasing luminosity (05-07) • Steady state Luminosity/operation (08-09) • Experiments aggressively making an investment in resources now to complete development work early • Finalizing energy scales • Using high luminosity bunch crossings to examine tracking and trigger issues that we will face • Finalizing physics algorithms • …. • Identify a core program of physics that is scientifically interesting and feasible • Realization that CDF and D0 will need to learn to operate with a smaller collaboration Rob Roser, FNAL

  10. A few Definitions • FTE • Fraction of a work week that person X is working on D0/CDF • Not fraction of research time • Not based on 40 hour week • No person can exceed 1.0, no matter how much they work • Service Work • Sum of Detector Operations + Offline Operations + Algorithm Development • While we tried to keep an accounting of all people that participate on the experiments, we are most interested in those who are listed on an MOU Rob Roser, FNAL

  11. Context of Detailed Analysis (to follow) • In 2002, both CDF and D0 undertook detector and trigger upgrades that were required for each experiment to handle luminosities above 2e32 and integrated luminosity > 2 fb-1 • CDF upgrades are nearly complete • New Central Preradiator installed in FY04 • Trigger and DAQ upgrades mostly installed and in use. • Only a few outstanding issues • D0 upgrades have several ugrades that remain to be installed • New silicon layer close to the beam pipe to be installed in the upcoming shutdown • New Calorimeter trigger to be installed in the upcoming shutdown • New AFE Electronics for fibre tracker to be installed in summer of 2006 Rob Roser, FNAL

  12. Implications on Resource Estimates • Installation and commissioning of the D0 upgrades, and the associated algorithm development results in larger resource demands at D0 during 2006 and 2007  • D0 will require one more full iteration of a new trigger list which takes into account the full breadth of their upgraded triggers. • 2007 • differences in total effort needs between CDF and D0 are primarily attributable to effort needed to complete implementation of the upgrades • 2009 • both experiments are in stable operations and have very comparable effort Rob Roser, FNAL

  13. Detector Operations • This group of people are responsible for the safe and efficient accumulation of data up to the point where it is written to tape. • Types of people required • Detector Experts • Data Acquisition Experts • Trigger Experts • Shift Crews for round the clock operation • Technical help (cryo, gas, electronics,…) Rob Roser, FNAL

  14. Detector Operations Detail 1 CDF D0 Total % FTE/subgroup Total % FTE/subgroup # People # People Subgroup Color Key Scientists Technical Shift Work Rob Roser, FNAL

  15. Detector Operations Detail 2 D0 CDF Total % FTE/subgroup Subgroup Total % FTE/subgroup # People # People Color Key Scientists Technical Shift Work  Totals Rob Roser, FNAL

  16. Diving Down in Operations • Calorimeter Subsystem is comprised of the following categories… • Each one has an estimate associated with it. • For CDF, the numbers are shown to the right… Rob Roser, FNAL

  17. Operations – High Level Summary Bottom Line -- It takes approximately 60 FTE to operate each detector Rob Roser, FNAL

  18. Offline Operations • Two types of resources, those • Dedicated to each experiment • Common to both – “Central Services” • Basic infrastructure • External Products • Underlying Technology Rob Roser, FNAL

  19. Offline Details (scientists) ALL These Resources come from Collaboration Scientists Rob Roser, FNAL

  20. Offline Computing Professionals These resources are detail those by computing professionals at FNAL Rob Roser, FNAL

  21. Offline Summary Rob Roser, FNAL

  22. Core Physics Analysis • Picked 10 physics analyses that are scientifically compelling measurements and demonstrate the potential of the collider program • a combination of precision measurements and searches/discovery potential • Searches • SM and MSSM Higgs, SUSY searches, Z’, LED, Bs • Precision • Top mass, Vtb, W mass, Vtb, Bs mixing, Bs lifetime Rob Roser, FNAL

  23. Algorithm Development Rob Roser, FNAL

  24. Core Physics Analysis Rob Roser, FNAL

  25. Summary of Analysis Needs Rob Roser, FNAL

  26. Summary of Subgroups…(needs) Rob Roser, FNAL

  27. Summary of Subgroups…(needs) Rob Roser, FNAL

  28. Summary • CDF and D0 have completed a full bottoms-up analysis of what it takes to operate the experiment. • This includes detector operations, offline, algorithm development, management, and analysis of a well defined core physics program • In 2009, when operations are stable, the two experiments’ resources show excellent agreement • In 2007, there is a differences in total needs primarily attributable to effort required to complete implementation of the D0 upgrades • These numbers will be the basis for the “gap analysis” to be shown by Terry. Rob Roser, FNAL

More Related