1 / 18

Muon Campus Projects

Muon Campus Projects. Jerry Annala Jan 23, 2013. AIP Scope. Recycler RF system to provide needed bunch structure to future Muon Experiments Recycler Extraction system and connection to P1 beam line Primary beam line aperture improvements Beam line power supply upgrades. Scope.

lilike
Télécharger la présentation

Muon Campus Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Muon Campus Projects Jerry Annala Jan 23, 2013

  2. AIP Scope • Recycler RF system to provide needed bunch structure to future Muon Experiments • Recycler Extraction system and connection to P1 beam line • Primary beam line aperture improvements • Beam line power supply upgrades

  3. Scope • Secondary beam line connection to Delivery Ring • Delivery Ring injection • Delivery Ring abort system • Delivery Ring extraction systems • Collider equipment removal • Delivery Ring power supply upgrades • Infrastructure (building electrical) • Instrumentation upgrades

  4. Schedule constraints • Availability of funds • Project Milestones • Accelerator schedule (Neutrino Program) • Length of tasks • Availability of resources

  5. AIP/GPP spending profile Required t o meet g-2 field shimming schedule Need to fill in funding and meet g-2 start date Required to meeting Ring shipping schedule Required installation during Accelerator Shutdowns

  6. Additional considerations • Period following present NOvA shutdown will be last opportunity to run beam prior to major reconfiguration • Controls to rings should be re-established before being interrupted by beam line construction • Savings to the lab possible by starting kicker controls work to coincide with Booster kicker work

  7. Additional Considerations • Early completion of beam line from RR to AP0 target would allow early commissioning and characterization • Long duration for tasks such as septa and kicker PS • Manpower availability may impact schedules based on these other considerations

  8. Costs Originally made up Recylcer AIP

  9. Costs

  10. Costs

  11. Costs

  12. Long term CD-schedule G-2 MC-1 Building Mu2e Hall Tunnel Enclosure CD-1 CD-3a CD-3c CD-2/3b CD-4 Accelerator Shutdown Accelerator Shutdown Accelerator Shutdown Accelerator Shutdown Accelerator Shutdown Mu2e Accelerator Shutdown Operation FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 g-2 Operation CD-2/3b Area of concentration CD-0 CD-1/3a CD-4 Conflict of concern CD-3c

  13. Milestone driven schedule items MC-1 Building Tunnel Enclosure Cryo AIP A0 Pond Would have to be part of AIP Ring Controls g-2 AP30 Cryo Room Mu2e CD-4 CD-3a CD-2/3b CD-1/3a CD-3c CD-2/3b Accelerator Shutdown Accelerator Shutdown Beam stud Accelerator Shutdown Beam studies FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

  14. Accelerator driven schedule MC-1 Building Tunnel Enclosure P1 stub line RR Extraction kicker MI52 Extension Recycler RF g-2 Beamline aperture Mu2e CD-4 CD-3a CD-2/3b CD-1/3a CD-3c CD-2/3b Accelerator Shutdown Accelerator Shutdown Beam stud Accelerator Shutdown Beam studies FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

  15. Costs based on externally driven schedule Resource limited year Funding limited years

  16. Other AIP costs

  17. Notes • Nothing planned to pay for storage or disposal of anything other than cable • We think we have done all the value engineering possible. • Still need to establish activities to allow proper tracking. • Magnet factory can do all of the individual jobs, but can they fit all of them in the available time

  18. Conclusion • Many non-technical factors will drive the schedule • Funding profile will make meeting schedule difficult • Original AIP funding packages are too close to (or beyond) spending limits • Complete involvement of Muon Dept. makes for good coordination, but will be source of some conflicts

More Related