290 likes | 379 Vues
Overview. A. Initial Introduction of Non-Native Species B. Coastwise Spread of Non-Native Species C. Verification of BWE. Collections Records. Reporting System. Literature. Monitoring. Database. Outputs & Applications. Invasion Patterns. Management Efficacy. Early Detection /
E N D
Overview A. Initial Introduction of Non-Native Species B. Coastwise Spread of Non-Native Species C. Verification of BWE
Collections Records Reporting System Literature Monitoring Database Outputs & Applications Invasion Patterns Management Efficacy Early Detection / Rapid Response Predictions Management / Policy NEMESIS(National Exotic Marine and Estuarine Species Information System)
Overview A. Initial Introduction of Non-Native Species B. Coastwise Spread of Non-Native Species C. Verification of BWE
Non-native invertebrate taxa reported in coastal waters of North America (n=326)
Assumptions for Current BW Management (BWE) • BW is a Dominant Vector • Invasion Risk is Greatest in Bays/Estuaries & Decreases Sharply with Distance offshore
Ship Arrivals from Overseas Ballast Water Dischage: • ~100 Million Metric Tons / YR Hull Surface Area: • ~ 335 Million M2 / YR
Possible vector for coastal NIS introduced to North America by shipping (n=171)
Assumptions for Current BW Management (BWE) • BW is a Dominant Vector • Invasion Risk is Greatest in Bays/Estuaries & Decreases Sharply with Distance offshore
Number of non-native invertebrate species reported for Pacific Coast bays 28% - 40%
Macro scale organisms (zooplankton) • Generally good agreement with assumption. • Possibly source (habitat) dependent. • There are exceptions to the “rules” (e.g. habitat sources and habitat generalists)
Overview A. Initial Introduction of Non-Native Species B. Coastwise Spread of Non-Native Species C. Verification of BWE
(r2=0.429; n=57) (r2=0.172; n=190)
(n=57) 17.5% (n=190) 40.0%
San Francisco Bay invasions n=124 r2=0.168 n=70
Who Spreads from San Francisco Bay? • Species with planktonic larvae: 23% • Species with nonplanktonic larvae: 50%
Summary: NIS spread • Spread patterns within coasts result from a combination of human-mediated transport and natural dispersal --- and their interactions with life history, behavior, abundance, habitat utilization, and current patterns. (b) Frequency differences in spread between coasts may result primarily from differences in “inter-island” distances and rates of natural dispersal.
Assumptions for Current BW Management (BWE) • BW is a Dominant Vector • Invasion Risk is Greatest in Bays/Estuaries & Decreases Sharply with Distance offshore
Relative Role of Ships’ Ballast vs. Hulls in Coastwise Spread?
Overview A. Initial Introduction of Non-Native Species B. Coastwise Spread of Non-Native Species C. Verification of BWE
Not exchanged (non-complying) exchanged (complying) The chemical signature of exchanged ballast water is more similar to water from the mid-ocean than water from its original coastal source.
Tracer Concentration Invasion Risk (prob of onshore transport) Distance from Shore
salinity: 36333633 • BWE greatly reduces concentrations of fluorescent components • Exchanged CDOM > Ocean CDOM • Signatures from all high salinity sources are similar salinity: 36333633 Effect of Ballast Water Exchange salinity: 36333027