1 / 22

COMPLIANCE & SOX

COMPLIANCE & SOX. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT At Issue. If the governance of the modern corporation isn’t completely broken, it is going through a severe crisis of confidence. At risk is the very integrity of capitalism.

lin
Télécharger la présentation

COMPLIANCE & SOX

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COMPLIANCE& SOX

  2. SARBANES-OXLEY ACTAt Issue • If the governance of the modern corporation isn’t completely broken, it is going through a severe crisis of confidence. At risk is the very integrity of capitalism. • Directors who fail to direct and CEOs who fail at moral leadership are arguably the most important challenge facing corporate America today. Business Week (May 6, 2002)

  3. SARBANES-OXLEY ACTThe Solution Starts At Home • The recent corporate collapses have involved many breakdowns: in ethics, in trust, in common sense, to name a few. But perhaps the most troubling breakdown is in corporate oversight. • Directors, senior executives, and Wall Street analysts all failed miserably by missing – or concealing – danger signals until it was too late. • Regulators will no doubt have plenty to say on the issue, but the most zealous reformers should be the companies themselves. Fortune (May 27, 2002)

  4. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS • 1900: NYSE requires distribution of annual reports to stockholders • 1909: NYSE requires annual stockholders’ meeting • 1926: NYSE adopts “one share, one vote” standard • 1929: Stock market crash • 1932: Increased financial disclosure and independent audits become mandatory • 1934: SEC is formed • 1955: Shareholder approval required for certain corporate acquisitions

  5. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS • 1968: AMEX publishes first guide establishing listing standards • 1977: NYSE requires establishment of an audit committee comprised of independent directors • 1985: NASDAQ initiates its first corporate governance listing standards • 1987: Treadway Commission (COSO) established to define responsibilities of the auditor in detecting and preventing fraud

  6. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS • 1999: NYSE/AMEX/NASD adopt new rules based on Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Audit Committees • 2002: Sarbanes-Oxley Act (July 30, 2002)

  7. SARBANES-OXLEYMajor Objectives • Improve corporate governance • Reform public accounting (auditing) • Reform Wall Street practices • Attack insider trading and obstruction of justice (document retention) “Restore confidence in capital markets”

  8. SARBANES-OXLEY ACTMajor Provisions • Title I: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board • Title II: Auditor Independence • Title III: Corporate Responsibility, Disclosure, and Governance • Title IV: Enhanced Financial Disclosures

  9. SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOther Provisions • Title V – Analyst Conflicts of Interest • Title VI – Commission (SEC) Resources and Authority • Title VII – Studies and Reports • Title VIII – Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability • Title IX – White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancements • Title X – Corporate Tax Returns • Title XI - Corporate Fraud and Accountability

  10. PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD • Established by Sarbanes-Oxley • Broad powers to regulate audits and auditors of public companies • Appointed by the SEC

  11. PCAOB • Register public accounting firms • Establish auditing standards • Inspect registered public accounting firms • Conduct investigations and disciplinary proceedings – with ability to sanction auditors and audit firms

  12. AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE • Prohibits certain “nonaudit services” • Bookkeeping, financial systems design, appraisal or valuation, actuarial, internal auditing outsourcing, management or human resources, broker-dealer or investment banking, others per PCAOB • Audit committee must pre-approve all auditing and non-auditing services • Audit partner rotation • Audit firm rotation was discussed

  13. AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE • Audit Committee is directly responsible for oversight of external auditors • Auditor required to discuss • All critical accounting policies and practices • All alternative accounting and disclosure treatments • Other material written communications • “Cooling – off” period • CEO, CFO, Controller, etc.

  14. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY & GOVERNANCE • Audit Committee = independent directors • Audit Committee has responsibility to appoint, compensate, and oversee public accounting firm performing the audit • Audit Committee has responsibility to resolve disagreements over financial reporting between management and external auditors • Audit Committee must establish “whistle-blower” procedures • New penalties for retaliation against them

  15. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY & GOVERNANCE • Requires executives and financial officers (CEO & CFO) to certify financial reports are accurate, complete and fairly presented • Also must certify the state of internal controls • Outlaws improperly influencing the auditor

  16. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY & GOVERNANCE • Reimbursement of bonuses and profits if public was misled • Removal of “substantial unfitness” standard • Prohibits trading during a pension “blackout” period • Minimum standards for attorneys • Both in-house and outside counsel • Any reimbursed funds from guilty parties be added to a fund for the benefit of victims

  17. ENHANCED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES • Off-balance sheet arrangements and obligations • Prohibits loans to executives and directors • Insider trades within two business days • Adoption of code of ethics for senior financial officers and requirements • Whether at least one member of the audit committee is an “Audit Committee Financial Expert”

  18. ENHANCED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES • Reconciliation of non GAAP revenue to most directly comparable GAAP measure • Requires management to establish and maintain adequate internal controls and report annually on: • Management’s responsibility for such • Effectiveness of such internal controls • Assessment of internal controls by management is to be subject of an attestation report by the external auditor

  19. PRIVATE COMPANIESWho Should Adopt SOX • May soon go public • Contemplating a combination with a public company • Large Not-for-profit entities • Audit committees becoming common • Significant absentee owners • Creditors may require SOX

  20. PRIVATE COMPANIESWhat parts of SOX? • More than internal controls • Independent audit committees • “Financial expert” • Compensation & funding of committee • Approval of nonaudit services • Certification of financial statements • Codes of ethics • Whistle-blower procedures and protections

  21. CORPORATE AMERICAAfter SOX • Must have autonomous & vigorous audit committees • “Take charge” • Financial information is inherently judgmental • Financial statements are NOT precise • Users must appreciate this fact • FMV reporting will increase volatility • Non-financial disclosures will become more important • Auditors’ opinions on overall “fairness” of statements • Financial reporting should be as clear and concise as possible Committee for Economic Development March 28, 2006

  22. CORPORATE AMERICAAfter SOX Give SOX (esp. 404) a chance to work • PCAOB has issued new guidelines • Learning curve effects • Excessive executive compensation can be tamed by Compensation Committees • Directors must be selected and appraised by independent nominating committees • Issue of Non-Executive Chair • Direct nomination by shareholders Committee for Economic Development March 28, 2006

More Related