1 / 38

NIHSS ASSESSMENT AND MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE

NIHSS ASSESSMENT AND MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE. Clinical Education M arshall Browning Hospital ASRH. Objectives. Discuss National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Be able to perform & accurately score the NIHSS Discuss common pitfalls. What is the NIHSS?.

linder
Télécharger la présentation

NIHSS ASSESSMENT AND MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NIHSS ASSESSMENT AND MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE Clinical Education Marshall Browning Hospital ASRH

  2. Objectives • Discuss National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) • Be able to perform & accurately score the NIHSS • Discuss common pitfalls

  3. What is the NIHSS? • Standardized and repeatable assessment of stroke patients • High intra/interobserver reliability (RNs/physicians) • Clinical research and communication tool • Can predict stroke severity & outcomes

  4. What is the NIHSS not? • It is NOT a complete neurologic evaluation & does not substitute for one • Will miss some posterior circulation strokes, will miss small isolated cortical strokes (i.e. strokes which affect only the distal hand) • Neurologic examination can be thought of as a “flexible tool”

  5. What does it do? • 15 parts • Tests language, vision, motor, sensory, coordination • 0 = no detectable deficits

  6. Common pitfall You don’t do this every day, so you are not sure how exactly to perform or score the exam. That is why we updated our NIHSS forms. They have explicit instructions copied directly from the NIH. For more stroke materials go to: https://stroke.nih.gov Do NOT try to depend on your memory to accurately perform the NIHSS.

  7. Same way, Every Time •To ensure reliability and reproducibility of results, examiner-patient interactions should be as uniform as possible. •Administer the stroke scale in the exact order. •Avoid coaching the patient. •Accept the patient’s first effort. •Score only what the patient DOES, not what you think they can do. •Include all deficits in scoring, even those from prior strokes.

  8. 1a – Level of consciousness 0 = Alert; keenly responsive. 1 = Not alert; but arousable by minor stimulation to obey, answer, or respond. 2 = Not alert; requires repeated stimulation to attend, or is obtunded and requires strong or painful stimulation to make movements (not stereotyped). 3 = Responds only with reflex motor or autonomic effects or totally unresponsive, flaccid, and areflexic.

  9. 1b – Level of consciousness (Questions) • Ask patient the month & age • No partial credit for being close • Accept the first answer only 0 = Answers both questions correctly. 1 = Answers one question correctly. 2 = Answers neither question correctly. • Impaired in patients with aphasia. • Most commonly seen with strokes in the left MCA territory. • Can be seen with gross encephalopathy.

  10. 1c – Level of consciousness (Commands) • Ask patient to open and close eyes • Ask patient to grip and release the non-paretic hand • If the patient does not respond, demonstrate the command. • 0 = Performs both tasks correctly. • 1 = Performs one task correctly. • 2 = Performs neither task correctly. Some patients may not be able to respond to your verbal cues, but be able to mimic your demonstration. This is consistent with impaired comprehension from stroke, most commonly seen with left MCA territory strokes.

  11. 2 – Best gaze • Tests only horizontal eye movements • Can be assessed on all patients • May try moving from one side of room to the other • Attempt oculocephalic if C-spine is cleared. • 0 = Normal. • 1 = Partial gaze palsy; gaze is abnormal in one or both eyes, but forced deviation or total gaze paresis is not present. • 2 = Forced deviation, or total gaze paresis not overcome by the oculocephalic maneuver. • We are normally taught the occulocephalic reflex in patients who are comatose. • A different response is expected in an awake patient. • Does not test for vertical eye movement or nystagmus which could be seen in a posterior circulation stroke • In a stroke, the patient normally looks towards the stroke “right way eyes”

  12. Normal in comatose patient Seen in awake patient fixating on object.

  13. Eye deviation can tell you a lot Frontal eye fields mediate contralateral (left moves to the right, right moves to the left) horizontal eye movements. Decrease in activity (stroke) causes the eyes to move in the direction of the stroke. “Right Way Eyes” Increase in activity makes the eyes move away

  14. Seizure (most common) • Pontine stroke • Thalamic hemorrhage • Stroke until proven otherwise • Rarely seen post-ictally

  15. 3 - Visual • Confrontation: check upper and lower visual fields individually, then give bilateral stimulation 0 = No visual loss. 1 = Partial hemianopia. (quadrantinopia or visual extinction) 2 = Complete hemianopia. 3 = Bilateral hemianopia (blind including cortical blindness). • Use yourself as a check • We test individually to evaluate the visual pathways. • Impairment with bilateral stimulus only is indicative of neglect/extinction, which is typically seen in parietal lesions, although the visual pathways are intact. • Stick with 1s and 5s. We are not checking visual acuity, just that all visual fields are intact with no extinction/neglect.

  16. Which of these visual fields is not consistent with stroke? B. A. D. C.

  17. Which of these visual fields is not consistent with stroke? C = bi-temporal hemianopsia—indicative of lesion before the brain. A. B. C. D.

  18. 4 – Facial palsy • Score of 3 on this is most consistent with a Bell’s palsy or peripheral cranial nerve 7 lesion. • This can be seen in a stroke involving the brainstem. • A trick to identifying this, is the weakness will be on the opposite side of the facial droop. • Ask patient to show teeth & close eyes. • If patient cannot respond attempt noxious stimuli. 0 = Normal symmetrical movements. 1 = Minor paralysis (flattened nasolabial fold, asymmetry on smiling). 2 = Partial paralysis (total or near-total paralysis of lower face). 3 = Complete paralysis of one or both sides (absence of facial movement in the upper and lower face).

  19. 5 – Motor Arm • Place the patient’s arm extended (palms facing down). Count and have them hold each arm for 10 seconds 0 = No drift; limb holds 90 (or 45) degrees for full 10 seconds. 1 = Drift; limb holds 90 (or 45) degrees, but drifts down before full 10 seconds; does not hit bed or other support. 2 = Some effort against gravity; limb cannot get to or maintain (if cued) 90 (or 45) degrees, drifts down to bed, but has some effort against gravity. 3 = No effort against gravity; limb falls. 4 = No movement UN= amputation or joint fusion • Beware of supports • Does not detect distal weakness • If you see an initial “dip” then the arm becomes steady score 0 • Count using your fingers, out loud, in view of the patient to overcome any barriers due to aphasia, auditory, or visual deficits

  20. 6 – Motor Leg • While lying supine, lift leg to 30 degrees and have patient hold the leg for 5 seconds while counting. • Follow the same overall guidance as in Motor Arm 0 = No drift; leg holds 30-degree position for full 5 seconds. 1 = Drift; leg falls by the end of the 5-second period but does not hit bed. 2 = Some effort against gravity; leg falls to bed by 5 seconds, but has some effort against gravity. 3 = No effort against gravity; leg falls to bed immediately. 4 = No movement UN = amputation or joint fusion

  21. 7 – Limb ataxia • Eyes open • Finger to nose • Heel to shin • Abnormal movements should be out of proportion to weakness • If paralyzed or unable to understand, give 0 for score. 0 = Absent. 1 = Present in one limb. 2 = Present in two limbs. UN = amputation or joint fusion • Does not assess for truncal ataxia which may be the only neurologic manifestation of a posterior circulation stroke

  22. Apraxia and ataxia Apraxia (noun) Total or partial loss of the ability to perform coordinated movements or manipulate objects in the absence of motor or sensory impairment; specifically, a disorder of motor planning. Think initiation Ataxia (noun) Lack of coordination while performing voluntary movements, which may appear to be clumsiness, inaccuracy, or instability. Think coordination.

  23. 8 - Sensory • Test pinprick on both sides. • Face, Arms (not hands), legs 0 = Normal; no sensory loss. 1 = Mild-to-moderate sensory loss; patient feels pinprick is less sharp or is dull on the affected side; or there is a loss of superficial pain with pinprick, but patient is aware of being touched. 2 = Severe to total sensory loss; patient is not aware of being touched in the face, arm, and leg. • Test right, left, both • This tells not only sensory information, but also extinction and inattention • Do not test through clothes • Do not test on hands, feet, or distal arms and legs to avoid peripheral neuropathies influencing findings

  24. Communication Matters

  25. 9 – Best language What is happening in this picture?

  26. 9 – Best language Name the objects

  27. 9 – Best language Read this out loud

  28. 9 – Best language 0 = No aphasia; normal. 1 = Mild-to-moderate aphasia; some obvious loss of fluency or facility of comprehension, without significant limitation on ideas expressed or form of expression. Reduction of speech and/or comprehension, however, makes conversation about provided materials difficult or impossible. For example, in conversation about provided materials, examiner can identify picture or naming card content from patient’s response. 2 = Severe aphasia; all communication is through fragmentary expression; great need for inference, questioning, and guessing by the listener. Range of information that can be exchanged is limited; listener carries burden of communication. Examiner cannot identify materials provided from patient response. 3 = Mute, global aphasia; no usable speech or auditory comprehension. • Aphasia is about the ability to use language, not about clear articulation • Difficulty finding the right word, understanding what is being said, expressing thoughts and concepts

  29. There is much more to the S in FAST than just slurred speech

  30. 10 - Dysarthria • Ask patient to read or repeat words from list • If pt is aphasic, you can still rate the clarity and articulation of their speech • May need to ask patient or family member if this is their normal speech 0 = Normal. 1 = Mild-to-moderate dysarthria; patient slurs at least some words and, at worst, can be understood with some difficulty. 2 = Severe dysarthria; patient's speech is so slurred as to be unintelligible in the absence of or out of proportion to any dysphasia, or is mute/anarthric.

  31. 10--Dysarthria Read or repeat

  32. 11 – Extinction & Inattention • Give bilateral visual stimuli (done in part 3) • Give bilateral sensory stimuli • The presence of visual spatial neglect or anosagnosia may also be taken as evidence of abnormality. 0 = No abnormality. 1 = Visual, tactile, auditory, spatial, or personal inattention or extinction to bilateral simultaneous stimulation in one of the sensory modalities. 2 = Profound hemi-inattention or extinction to more than one modality; does not recognize own hand or orients to only one side of space.

  33. Questions?

  34. References https://www.nih.gov/ Blumenfeld, Neuroanatomy through Clinical Cases “Overview of the evaluation of stroke,” Uptodate.com Adams H, Davis P, Hansen M, et al. "Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke - A report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST)". Muir KW, Weir CJ, Murray GD, Povey C, Lees KR (1996). "Comparison of neurological scales and scoring systems for acute stroke prognosis". Stroke. 27: 1817–1820.  Neurology, 2015. Brian Katz et all, “Interrater Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Rating by Emergency Room Physicians and Neurologists in a Population-Based Study”

  35. MRS(modified Rankin Scale) • The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence inthedaily activities of people who have suffered a strokeor other causes of neurological disability. • It has become the most widely used clinical outcome measure for stroke clinical trials. t

  36. MRS – Summary and Key Points • The MRS is a standard function outcome measure in clinical stroke trials • The exam is scored based on current overall function, not just what is attributed to stroke deficits Questions?

More Related