1 / 41

Plasma in the solar system: science and missions Stas Barabash

Plasma in the solar system: science and missions Stas Barabash Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF) Kiruna, Sweden. Swedish Institute of Space Physics. Established 1957 A governmental research institute under the auspice of Ministry of Education. Annual budget ~ 9 M€

linnea
Télécharger la présentation

Plasma in the solar system: science and missions Stas Barabash

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Plasma in the solar system: science and missions Stas Barabash Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF) Kiruna, Sweden

  2. Swedish Institute of Space Physics • Established 1957 • A governmental research institute under the auspice of Ministry of Education. Annual budget ~ 9 M€ • Basic research in the area of space physics, space technology/instrumentation, atmospheric physics, and long-term observations (geophysical observatory) • Division of Space engineering of Luleå Technical University and EU Erasmus Mundus SpaceMaster program

  3. PI missions since 1978

  4. Swedish missions Odin 2001 Magnetospheric physics: Viking, Freja, Astrid-1/2, Munin Technology demonstrator: PRISMA Atmospheric physics / Astronomy: Odin PRISMA, 2008 Astrid-2, 1999 Viking, 1986 Astrid-1, 1995 Munin, 2000 Freja, 1992

  5. Solar wind • Solar wind is a plasma flow blowing away from the Sun. • The complicated wave - particle interaction near the photoshere (“Sun surface”), which is not well - understood, results in the heating of the solar corona plasma from 6·103 K to 106 K. • The thermal expansion of the solar corona in the presence of the gravitation field converts the thermal energy to the direction flow (“gravitational nozzle”). • Solar wind is a supersound flow of plasma (95% p+, 5% a-particles) with a velocity of 450 km/s and density about 70 cm-3 (Mercury) to 3 cm-3 at Mars

  6. What defines the type of the solar wind interaction • Charge particles of the solar wind can be only affected by a magnetic field at an obstacle • The magnetic field may originates from: • Intrinsic field of an obstacle • Currents induced in a conductive obstacle as a result of the interaction • The obstacle’s magnetic field: • Intrinsic dipoles (Earth, Mercury, Jupiter, Uranus, Neptune) • Local crust magnetizations (Moon, Mars) • Conductivity of the obstacle (Mars, Venus) • Conductivity of rocks low • The presence of the conductive material (ionosphere, an ionized part of the atmosphere) increases conductivity ( s ~ne , for magnetized plasmas we >> nc)

  7. Types of the solar wind interactions

  8. Corotating Jovian magnetosphere Induced magnetospheres of Mars and Venus Earth magnetosphere Interaction with the Moon Terrestrial magnetosphere

  9. Field of the solar wind interactions. Why is it important? • The fundamental scientific questions to address: • Space plasma physics: What is the structure and characteristics of the near-planet environment? What physics governs the interaction? • Planetology: What is the impact of the interaction (environment) on the central body? • Non-thermal atmospheric escape (non-magnetized planets) • Auroral phenomena and influence on thermospheres • Surface space weathering (airless bodies)

  10. Magnetic field measurements. Why are they important? • Magnetic field measurements are essential to organize and understand energetic charged particle and plasma measurements. • Magnetic field measurements also represent one of the very few remote sensing tools that provide information about the deep interior. • Magnetic field of Earth, Jupiter, Saturn are generated by currents circulating in their liquid metallic cores. • Uranus’ and Neptune’s magnetic fields are generated closer to the surface by electrical currents flowing in high-conductivity crustal ‘‘oceans.’’ • Mercury is currently magnetized by the remains of an ancient dynamo • Subsurface oceans on Europa, Ganymede, Callisto were first sensed by a magnetometer

  11. Instrumentation to study near-planet space. Particles • Particle distribution functions: amount of particles of a certain kind from a certain direction at a certain energy in each measurement point • Types of instruments • Ion and electron spectrometers • Ion mass analyzers • Energetic neutrals imagers • Energetic particle telescopes • Radiation monitors • Energy ranges • meV - 10s eV: thermal plasma • 10s eV - 10s keV: hot plasma • 10s keV - Mev: energetic particles • MeV - 100s MeV: radiation flux Mars-96 / ASPERA

  12. Instrumentation to study near-planet space. Field and waves • Thermal plasma density and temperature • Langmuir probes • Density 0.1 - 100 cm-3 • T ~ 0.1 - 10 eV • Magnetic and electric field vectors and magnitude. Frequency spectra • Typical instruments • Magnetometers • Electric field experiments • Correlators with particle fluxes • Typical magnitudes • B-field: 0.01 nT - few 10 000 nT • E-field: 0.01 - 10 mV / m Ørsted satellite (1999)

  13. Basic platform requirements • Particle measurements (energetic particles) • Unobscured omnidirectional (4p) field of view • Avoidance of thruster plumes and firing • Spacecraft potential control • Thermal plasma measurements (plasma density/temperature) • Minimizing effect of the spacecraft on thermal plasma: booms/sticks • Fields and plasma wave measurements • Minimizing effect of the spacecraft • Magnetic cleanliness • Booms • Electro-Magnetic Compatibility (EMC) programs. Some what more stringent than usual (not discussed here)

  14. Unobscured omnidirectional field of view Lewis et al., 2009 • The main and the most challenging requirement • Can be fully (4p) fulfilled only on spinning platforms • Possible solutions for 3-axis stabilized platforms • 2 hemispheric identical sensors: mass increase! • Fan-type field of view (180° over polar angle) on mechanical scanners and attenuators: attitude disturbances • Spun sections on 3-axis stabilized platforms: enormously expensive

  15. Galileo despun platform

  16. Mechanical scanners (1) • Typical moving mass 4 kg, L ~ 0.1 m, w ~ 1 rpm • Typical spacecraft mass 0.5 - 1 tons, L ~ 1 m, w ~ 10-4 rpm Spin axis

  17. Mechanical scanners (2) 0.02°

  18. Spin-stabilized platforms (spinners) MMO • Mission examples • JAXA Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter • ESA Cluster (Earth magnetosphere) • Swedish Freja (Earth magnetosphere) • Typical spin rates 10 - 20 rpm • Only limited imaging experiments can be carried out • High intensity emissions / large fields of view • Auroral / EUV imaging • Scanning photometers Cluster Freja

  19. Thruster plumes and firing Rosetta / Schläppi et al., 2010 • Operating even attitude thrusters (1 - 10 N) increase gas pressure around spacecraft. • It may result in discharge in instruments ion optics using high voltage of few kV • Hydrazine / Nitrogen thetroxide may contaminate open particle detectors • Usually weak requirement • Can be fulfilled by proper accommodation and thruster shields (conflict with blocking of field-of-view) Attitude maneuver

  20. Spacecraft potential • Due to release of photoelectrons (discharging) and accommodation of electrons and ions from the ambient plasmas (charging), spacecraft surfaces get charged and are under a potential relative to the ambient plasma • Typical values between -10..-20 to +30…+50 V • In energetic plasma on night side the potential may reach -500…-1000 V • The spacecraft potential affects the particle measurement at the respective energies: energy cut-off at ~q Vsc • Differential charging over the spacecraft affects particle trajectories • The surfaces (MLI) surrounding instruments must be conductive. • Spacecraft potential control systems (electron emitters) may be required. • If not possible, the spacecraft potential should be measured.

  21. Thermal plasma measurements (1) • Langmuir probes: small spheres (5-10 cm diam.) biased at different voltages. The measurable is the current to the sphere (volt-amp characteristics) • From voltage - current curve one deduces: • Plasma density and temperature • Spacecraft potential (voltage when the current = 0) • Spacecraft potential affects the surrounding plasma and the influence should be minimized Rosetta simulations / Sjögren, 2009 32 m

  22. Thermal plasma measurements (2) • Rigid (quasi-rigid) booms / sticks are required • The length depends on the spacecraft size and plasma parameters (the denser plasma, the shorter boom) • The longer, the better. Minimum 1 m Cassini Langmuir probe

  23. Magnetic field measurements Voyager-1 (1977) • It is practically impossible to reduce the stray spacecraft magnetic field from a platform to the smallest required levels. • Solar arrays, motors, actuators, power systems, magnetic materials, etc • The magnetic cleanliness programs on the early planetary missions were enormously expensive (will never repeat again). • Pioneer 10 / 11 (launched 1973) achieved 0.01 nT at the 3 m distance (practical limit) • Long booms are required: B ~ 1/r3 • Double magnetometer techniques: shorter booms with two magnetometers to obtain the spacecraft stray field (extra mass) 14 m

  24. Electric field measurements • A space voltmeter: the potential difference between two terminals (probes) is measured. • The electrostatic spacecraft potential (1 - 10 V) and V ~ Vsc Dsc/r • To measure fields of Emin ~ 0.01 mV/m • Booms of 30m are required! V = V1 - V2 (measured), E = V / L

  25. General boom designs (1) • Rigid tubular booms max. 3 segments mostly for magnetometers • Scissor booms on MAGSAT (1979) • Optical mirrors are mounted on the magnetometer sensor platform to ‘‘transfer’’ its orientation to the main body of the spacecraft using infrared beams. • Truss-like “astromast” designs (Polar / WIND) 6 m MAGSAT 6 m

  26. General boom designs (2) • Wire booms deployed by centrifugal force for E-field experiments and Langmuir probes Magnetometer and star camera Langmuir probe E-field wire booms Swedish Astrid-2

  27. A typical plasma science spacecraft ESA-JAXA BepiColombo / Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter

  28. Plasma instruments vs. remote sensing • Main conclusion: Requirements (and thus platform design drivers) are different and in general not compatible. • Trade-off may not be always possible

  29. Very few dedicated space plasma missions (planetary) Nozomi • Mars: Nozomi (ISAS, Japan, 1998) • Mars: MAVEN (NASA, 2013) • Not a spinner! • Mercury: BepiColombo MMO Mercury Magnetospheic orbiter (JAXA, 2014) • Piggy-backing on ESA BepiColombo Mercury Planetary Orbiter MAVEN

  30. Possible “main stream” solutions • Piggy-backing on “planetary-proper” missions • Small scale national / bilateral dedicated missions • Proposals from the Swedish Institute of Space Physics • 3 missions to Mars • MOPS, a microsat on Phobos-Grunt (discussions with NPO Lavochkin) • Mjolnir, a microsat on the ESA Cosmic vision MEMOS (proposal) • Solaris, a microsat on a NASA discovery mission (proposal) • 2 missions to the Moon • Lunar Explorer, a Swedish microsat (proposal) • A mission within the Chinese space program (under discussion) • A microsat on Venus Express (mission idea)

  31. Moon space plasma mission (1) • A small space plasma mission to the Moon: Swedish Space Corporation feasibility study of 1996 • Payload: Particle instruments, magnetic and electric field measurements including waves • Study conclusion: a small space plasma mission at the Moon is doable and can be conducted on the moderate (national) level. • Estimated cast: ca. 23 M€ (229 MSEK) in 1996

  32. Moon space plasma mission (2) Basic mission characteristics from the feasibility study • Launch: Kosmos-3M/Tsiklon • TTI (Translunar Trajectory Injection) • From an eccentric LEO • DV = 1300 - 2200 m/s (depending on launcher) • Lunar Orbit Insertion (LOI) • Direct insertion from TTI • DV = 1200-1600 m/s depending on the final orbit • Propulsion system for TTI/LOI (2 alternatives) • Solid (STAR 24A) /Mono-propellant • Bi-propellant/ Bi-propellant

  33. Moon space plasma mission (3) Basic mission characteristics from the feasibility study • A spinning platform with spin axis pointing to the Sun • 166 kg total mass at the Moon inc. 36 kg of payload with booms • Equatorial orbit 400 x 5000 km to sample the lunar wake • Communications • Omnidirec. LGA S-band to 9-m G/S antenna (ESRANGE): 5-6 kbps • 40 cm HGA S-band to 9-m G/S antenna (ESRANGE): 133 kps

  34. Mars Orbiting Plasma Surveyor (MOPS). Overview • Dedicated space plasma mission to Mars • Earth - pointing spin stabilized platform • Direct communication with the Earth • Wet mass: 76.1 kg • Dry mass: 60.0 kg (inc. 5% margin) • Payload mass: 10 kg • Piggy-back on a mission to Mars • Separation right after MOI • Hohmann transfer onto a working orbit (500 km x 10000 km, equatorial) • Life time: 1 Martian year (687 days) • Operations in the eclipse • Pre-phase A technical study completed by Swedish Space Corporation, Solna, Sweden. Example mother ship - Russian Phobos-Grunt • The project is technically feasible

  35. “Art house” ideas. Impact probes • A small (nano) satellite to conduct measurements until not- surviving impact • Greatly reduced platform masses • Only for airless bodies (Moon, Callisto, Ganymede, Pluto) • Feasible for fly-by missions or scientific objectives requiring measurements at the surface Pluto probe (proposal). 2.8 kg / ø22 x 7 cm Chandrayaan-1 / MIP

  36. Feasible AND interesting new targets (beside the Earth) • Mercury, Mars, comets, Saturn covered • Venus: A dedicated space plasma mission on a spin-stabilized platform • Jupiter. Jupiter Magentospheric Orbiter (JAXA) • Solar sail • Combined with a mission to Trojans • Uranus orbiter: Identified in the recent the 2011 Planetary and Astronomy Decadal Survey • Mission to a new type of object “Icy Giants” • Not a dedicated space plasma mission but the Uranus’ magnetosphere is unique: magnetic moment rotates around solar wind direction

More Related