1 / 22

The “ Academic Freedom ” bill enables teachers to tell their children that

The “ Academic Freedom ” bill enables teachers to tell their children that “Creationism, Intelligent design etc” are as well - if not more – scientifically verified as Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. Promoted by the Discovery Institute.

ljun
Télécharger la présentation

The “ Academic Freedom ” bill enables teachers to tell their children that

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The “Academic Freedom” bill enables teachers to tell their children that “Creationism,Intelligent design etc” are as well - if not more – scientifically verified as Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Promoted by the Discovery Institute

  2. "Anybody with half a brain can see that natural selection takes place.

  3. But to make great leaps from a fish to a man ...

  4. But to make great leaps from a fish to a man ... the fossil record doesn't support all that." Beverly Slough

  5. Maybe it needs a whole brain?

  6. Students need to hear all points of view and draw their own conclusions The Academic Freedom bill would enable “Creationism” etc to be presented as a scientifically accepatble alternative to Evolution Promoted by the Discovery Institute

  7. Maybe it needs a whole brain?

  8. Beverly Slough president-elect of the Florida School Boards Association

  9. The standards should be flexible enough for students to "seek all points of view and draw their own conclusions The Academic Freedom bill Promoted by the Discovery Institute

  10. ..thought that the proposed State of Florida Science Standards' embrace of Darwin's theory of evolution was dogmatic and intellectually dishonest.

  11. She also said evolution was as unprovable as creationism or intelligent design because "nobody was there when life began.“

  12. The standards should be flexible enough for students to "seek all points of view and draw their own conclusions

  13. Science standards, intellectual honesty January 07, 2008 Beverly Slough is president-elect of the Florida School Boards Association

  14. ..thought that the proposed State of Florida Science Standards' embrace of Darwin's theory of evolution was dogmatic and intellectually dishonest. "I implore you not to shut the door on intellectual honesty and the ability of our children to explore other options.“

  15. Slough said there are too many "large gaps" in the fossil record to blindly support Darwin's theory: "Anybody with half a brain can see that natural selection takes place. But to make great leaps from a fish to a man ... the fossil record doesn't support all that."

  16. Slough said a "wording change" might be the solution - something that softened up the proposed standards' assertion that Darwin's theory is the bedrock of modern biology (which the vast majority of scientists agree that it is.) She also said she planned to raise the issue both with her school board and the Florida School Boards Association.

  17. Science standards, intellectual honesty January 07, 2008 Count the president-elect of the Florida School Boards Association as another top school official with concerns about the state's proposed new science standards. Beverly Slough, a school board member in St. John's County in northeast Florida, voiced her concerns at Thursday's public hearing in Jacksonville (see the St. Petersburg Times coverage here.)

  18. Echoing other critics at the meeting, Slough said she was not advocating the teaching of creationism or intelligent design, but thought that the proposed standards' embrace of Darwin's theory of evolution was dogmatic and intellectually dishonest. The standards should be flexible enough for students to "seek all points of view and draw their own conclusions," she told Department of Education officials. "I implore you not to shut the door on intellectual honesty and the ability of our children to explore other options.“

  19. Reached by The Gradebook this morning, Slough said there are too many "large gaps" in the fossil record to blindly support Darwin's theory: "Anybody with half a brain can see that natural selection takes place. But to make great leaps from a fish to a man ... the fossil record doesn't support all that." She also said evolution was as unproveable as creationism or intelligent design because "nobody was there when life began.“

  20. Slough said a "wording change" might be the solution - something that softened up the proposed standards' assertion that Darwin's theory is the bedrock of modern biology (which the vast majority of scientists agree that it is.) She also said she planned to raise the issue both with her school board and the Florida School Boards Association. - Ron Matus, state education reporter

More Related