SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Genomics, Computing, Economics

loe avatar
16 diapositives · 350 Views · Sep 20, 2014

Genomics, Computing, Economics. 10 AM Tue 20-Feb. Harvard Biophysics 101  ( MIT-OCW Health Sciences & Technology 508 ) http://openwetware.org/wiki/Harvard:Biophysics_101/2007. Class outline. (1) Topic priorities for homework since last class

Genomics, Computing, Economics - slide 1
01 / 16Genomics, Computing, Economics
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Genomics, Computing, Economics
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Genomics, Computing, Economics 10 AM Tue 20-Feb Harvard Biophysics 101  (MIT-OCW Health Sciences & Technology 508) http://openwetware.org/wiki/Harvard:Biophysics_101/2007

  2. Class outline (1) Topic priorities for homework since last class (2) Quantitative exercises: psycho-statistics, combinatorials, exponential/logistic, bits, association & multi-hypotheses, FBA (3) Project level presentation & discussion Personalized Medicine & Energy Metabolism (4) Discuss communication/presentation tools (5) Topic priorities for homework for next class

  3. Steady-state flux optima RC Flux Balance Constraints: RA< 1 molecule/sec (external) RA = RB(because no net increase) x1 + x2< 1 (mass conservation) x1 >0 (positive rates) x2 > 0 C x1 RB RA A B x2 D RD x2 Max Z=3 at (x2=1, x1=0) Feasible flux distributions Z = 3RD + RC (But what if we really wanted to select for a fixed ratio of 3:1?) x1

  4. Applicability of LP & FBA • Stoichiometry is well-known • Limited thermodynamic information is required • reversibility vs. irreversibility • Experimental knowledge can be incorporated in to the problem formulation • Linear optimization allows the identification of the reaction pathways used to fulfil the goals of the cell if it is operating in an optimal manner. • The relative value of the metabolites can be determined • Flux distribution for the production of a commercial metabolite can be identified. Genetic Engineering candidates

  5. Precursors to cell growth • How to define the growth function. • The biomass composition has been determined for several cells, E. coli and B. subtilis. • This can be included in a complete metabolic network • When only the catabolic network is modeled, the biomass composition can be described as the 12 biosynthetic precursors and the energy and redox cofactors

  6. in silico cells E. coli H. influenzae H. pylori Genes 695 362 268 Reactions 720 488 444 Metabolites 436 343 340 (of total genes 4300 1700 1800) Edwards, et al 2002. Genome-scale metabolic model of Helicobacter pylori 26695. J Bacteriol. 184(16):4582-93. Segre, et al, 2002 Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. PNAS 99: 15112-7. (Minimization Of MetabolicAdjustment )http://arep.med.harvard.edu/moma/

  7. Where do the Stochiometric matrices (& kinetic parameters) come from? EMP RBC, E.coli KEGG, Ecocyc

  8. Biomass Composition ATP GLY LEU coeff. in growth reaction ACCOA NADH FAD SUCCOA COA metabolites

  9. Flux ratios at each branch point yields optimal polymer composition for replication x,y are two of the 100s of flux dimensions

  10. Minimization of Metabolic Adjustment (MoMA)

  11. Flux Data

  12. C009-limited 200 WT (LP) 180 7 8 160 140 9 120 10 Predicted Fluxes r=0.91 p=8e-8 100 11 14 13 12 3 1 80 60 40 16 20 2 6 5 15 4 17 18 0 0 50 100 150 200 Experimental Fluxes 250 250 Dpyk (LP) Dpyk (QP) 200 200 18 7 r=0.56 P=7e-3 8 r=-0.06 p=6e-1 150 150 7 8 2 Predicted Fluxes Predicted Fluxes 10 9 13 100 9 100 11 12 3 1 14 10 14 13 11 12 3 50 50 5 6 4 16 16 2 15 5 6 18 17 15 17 0 0 4 1 -50 -50 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 Experimental Fluxes Experimental Fluxes

  13. Competitive growth data: reproducibility Correlation between two selection experiments Badarinarayana, et al. Nature Biotech.19: 1060

  14. Competitive growth data On minimal media negative small selection effect C 2 p-values 4x10-3 1x10-5 LP QP Novel redundancies Position effects Hypothesis: next optima are achieved by regulation of activities.

  15. Non-optimal evolves to optimal Ibarra et al.Nature. 2002 Nov 14;420(6912):186-9. Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth.

  16. Further optimization readings Duarte et al. reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 6;104(6):1777-82. Joyce AR, Palsson BO. Toward whole cell modeling and simulation: comprehensive functional genomics through the constraint-based approach. Prog Drug Res. 2007;64:265, 267-309. Review. Herring, et al. Comparative genome sequencing of Escherichia coli allows observation of bacterial evolution on a laboratory timescale. Nat Genet. 2006 Dec;38(12):1406-12. Desai RP, Nielsen LK, Papoutsakis ET. Stoichiometric modeling of Clostridium acetobutylicum fermentations with non-linear constraints. J Biotechnol. 1999 May 28;71(1-3):191-205.