1 / 30

SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR: Increasing energy savings, reliability and security

SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR: Increasing energy savings, reliability and security. OVERVIEW. What is solar PV and how does it work? Benefits of PV Challenges to implementation Case studies Opportunities: Rebates, Financing & Procurement Three Solar Scenarios Recommendations.

louanna
Télécharger la présentation

SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR: Increasing energy savings, reliability and security

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAICFOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR:Increasing energy savings, reliability and security

  2. OVERVIEW • What is solar PV and how does it work? • Benefits of PV • Challenges to implementation • Case studies • Opportunities: Rebates, Financing & Procurement • Three Solar Scenarios • Recommendations

  3. WHAT IS SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC (PV)?How PV Works • Deposit chemical compounds on to substrate (silicon) • Particle of sunlight hits photovoltaic chemical • Electron knocked loose by particle • Free electrons collected at conductors • DC electricity produced • Inverter converts DC electricity to AC electricity

  4. WHAT IS SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC (PV)?Some Quick Facts • No moving parts, no noise, no smell • Used for decades • NASA space stations/satellites • Off-grid applications • 20 - 25 year manufacturer warranty • Produce electricity for 30 + yrs. • 1 % loss in generation per year (warranty takes into account)

  5. BENEFITS OF PV • Energy self-reliance/independence • Stabilize long-term energy prices • Reduce fossil-fuel and natural gas price risks • Ensure reliable supply • Support energy security and community security • Local Economic Development • Supports local labor pool • Environmental Benefits • Improve Air Quality (reduction in N0x, S0x, CO2 emissions) • Linked to asthma, respiratory illness, acid rain, ozone, global warming • Reduce need for large, central power plants • Uncertain supply for new natural gas power plants

  6. BENEFITS OF PV • Other benefits • Budget for fixed energy costs • Avoids uncertain utility rates for public facilities • Benefit from free energy after system is paid off • Off-set peak load demand • Diversify state-wide energy portfolio • Increases supplies and stabilizes prices • Set an example of environmental stewardship for community

  7. CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION(Why isn’t everyone doing it?) • Front-loaded costs • Pay 30+ years of electricity in 15 - 20 years • Can be addressed through Life-Cycle Costing Analysis and long-term, low-interest financing • Lack of local government resources • Human • Financial • Knowledge and familiarity with technology • Can be provided through assistance programs and/or consultants • Local policy/municipal bureaucracy • Can create barriers to permitting, procurement, installation

  8. ROLE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT • NREL Study (October 2000) • 200 MW rooftop generation capacity on city and county facilities in California • 1500 MW capacity on school rooftops • Enough electricity to power 1.5 million homes • Study available at www.lgc.org/spire • Stimulating market transformation • Enacting PV- and wind-friendly policies and ordinances • Facilitating investment in renewable energy by reducing financing and transaction costs for residents and businesses (Solar Sebastopol Feasibility Study, Sonoma State University, 2002)

  9. CASE STUDY:SANTA CRUZ CITY HALL ANNEX • 14 kW roof-top PV system • Generates 25,000 kW/yr • 7% building’s power needs • Enough energy for 4 -5 homes • $40,000 grant from Palo Alto Municipal Utility • CEC’s Buy-Down Rebate (50% system cost) • First of many installations

  10. CASE STUDY: SANTA RITA JAIL • 1.18 MW Solar PV • Installed in two phases • R-11 polystyrene foam roofing insulation • New 850 ton high efficiency chiller • Cool Roof • Computerized energy management system • Previously upgraded to efficient lighting systems

  11. CASE STUDY: SANTA RITA JAIL • $7.5 Million Cost ($410,000 Annual Savings) • $2,560,000 rebate from CEC Renewable Buy Down • $1,770,00 PG&E’s Self-Generation Grant • $250,000 from PG&E’s cross-cutting demand program • $306,000 from AB970 funds for solar installations • $84,000 from AB970 funds for Smart Controls • $45,000 from AB970 funds for Cool Roofs • $980,000 low interest loan from CEC • Balance came from existing budget authorizations for roof and energy projects, and first year savings 3 Acres of PV: largest rooftop installation in Western Hemisphere $15 million in savings over 25 year project life

  12. CASE STUDY: SANTA MONICA • Santa Monica • World’s first solar powered ferris wheel (50 kW) • 2 electric vehicle charging stations totaling 33.3 kW • Green Affordable Housing (Colorado Court) • Issued RFPs for City Solar Plan and Solar Schools

  13. CASE STUDY: SAN FRANCISCO • San Francisco • FY 1998-1999: $7,000,000 for electricity • FY 2000-2001: $39,000,000 for electricity • November ballot measures: • Prop. B and Prop H. • Revenue bond for renewable self generation • $100,000,000 • 10 + MW PV • 30 MW Wind • Energy Efficiency • Passed by 73% of voters • First Project: Moscone Center 688 kW www.votesolar.org

  14. CASE STUDY: VALLEJO • Vallejo • Combining efficiency and self generation to provide all of its municipal electricity needs (10 MW) • Installed energy misers on all computer equipment • Installed LED traffic signals • Installed energy usage monitor 24/7 • Funding from ESCOs - repaid out of energy savings (no local tax payer dollars) • Installing 1 MW “solar farm” ($2,500,000 CEC rebate) • Exploring wind turbines and natural gas micro-turbines • 150-500 MW of wind capacity

  15. OTHER CITIES GOING SOLAR • Vacaville • Electric Vehicle program with two-40 kW PV charging stations • Redding • 1 kW at Enterprise Park • RFP for 20kW of PV at City Hall • Riverside • 113 kW solar carport at Riverside Utilities Operations Center provides shade for 152 parking spaces • Large-scale procurement effort • Fairfield • 2.6 kW for EV charging stations at new Transportation Center • Future plans for 1 MW covered parking at park-and-ride lot

  16. OPPORTUNITIES TO LEVERAGE • Rebate Incentives • Low-interest, long-term financing • Third party financing and public/private partnerships

  17. REBATE INCENTIVES • California Energy Commission’s (CEC) Renewable Energy Buy-Down • $4.50/watt up to 50% of system cost • Check on availability of funds for systems over 10 kW • Investor Owned Utilities (PG & E) Self Generation Incentive • $4.50/watt up to 50% of system cost • Systems larger than 30 kW • CEC’s Solar Schools Program • Up to 90% of purchase and installation costs • Maximum $153,000 per school district

  18. REBATE INCENTIVES • U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Renewable Energy Production Incentive • $1.5 cents per kWh produced for first 10 years (1993 dollars) • Must be a qualifying facility • 10 kW system = approx. $3,000 over 10 years • Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Funds • Potential funding source for electric vehicle PV charging stations • Check with your local utility company for other rebate incentives

  19. FINANCING • CEC’S 4% loan for cities, counties, hospitals, schools for cost-effective energy projects • 11 year payback • Projects must qualify • California Communities • CaLease Financing for up to 10 years • 5.35- 5.85% with $250,000 minimum • Rural Alliance, Inc. • Up to 20 year loans from 5.0 - 5.85%, $10,000 and up • Feasibility studies not required

  20. FINANCING • California Power Authority PULSE Program • $25 - 50 million in low-interest financing for energy efficiency and renewable energy • $2 million minimum • Third Party Financing/ Public-Private Partnerships • Allows for private sector tax benefits • Multi-year contract for electricity below current utility rate • No capital costs for local government • Lease to own option • Revenue Bonds • Revenue from avoided energy costs (energy efficiency) repays bond at no cost to tax payers.

  21. EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT OPTIONS • RFQ or RFP for “turnkey system” • Bid-less procurement • CA Dept. General Services CMAS • SMUD PV Pioneers Program • Third-party/Public-private partnership

  22. LONG-TERM ENERGY COSTS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES* • Summary of Electric Service Demand and Charges • Period: 12/6/00 - 12/7/01 • Total annual energy needs: 876,640 kWh • Annual energy cost: $121,716.44 • Average cost/kWh: 13.9 cents • Period: 12/7/01 - 5/9/02 • 37% rate increase in first 5 billing periods this year • Average cost/kWh (projected this year): 19 cents *Actual calculations from the Municipal Center in Chico, CA (PG&E’s territory)

  23. SOLAR SCENARIOS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES • Scenario One: 10 kW demonstration project • Produce 15,524 kWh/year (2% electrical needs) • Require about 1,000 sq. ft. unobstructed, south-facing rooftop area • Cost of System (assuming $9,500/kW): $ 95,000 Total Installed Cost - $ 45,000 CEC Buy Down $ 50,000 Cost to City • Cost/kWh: $50,000 / 465,720 kWh = 10.7 cents/kWh • Simple Payback with no escalation: 22.4 years ($0.14/kWh avg.) with 1% escalation: 19.3 years ($0.14/kWh avg.) with no escalation: 17.0 years ($0.19/kWh avg.) with 1% escalation: 14.6 years ($0.19/kWh avg.)

  24. SOLAR SCENARIOS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES • Scenario Two: 50 kW Installation • Produce 77,619 kWh/year (10% electrical needs) • Require 5,000 sq. ft. unobstructed, south-facing rooftop area • Cost of System (assuming $8,000/kW): $ 400,000 Total Installed Cost - $ 200,000 Self-Gen Incentive through PG&E $ 200,000 Cost to City • Cost/kWh: $200,000 / 2,328,570 kWh = 8.6 cents/kWh • Simple Payback with no escalation: 17.9 years ($0.14/kWh avg.) with 1% escalation: 15.4 years ($0.14/kWh avg.) with no escalation: 13.6 years ($0.19/kWh avg.) with 1% escalation: 11.7 years ($0.19/kWh avg.)

  25. SOLAR SCENARIOS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES • Scenario Three: 565 kW Installation • Produce 876,640 kWh/year (100% electrical needs) • Require 56,500 sq. ft. unobstructed, south-facing area • Cost of System (assuming $6,500/kW): $ 3,165,500 Total Installed Cost - $ 1,582,750 Self-Gen Incentive from PG&E $ 1,582,750 Cost to City • Cost/kWh: $1,582,750 / 26,299,200 kWh = 7 cents/kWh • Simple Payback with no escalation: 12.9 years ($0.14/kWh avg.) with 1% escalation: 11.1 years ($0.14/kWh avg.) with no escalation: 9.5 years ($0.19/kWh avg.) with 1% escalation: 8.2 years ($0.19/kWh avg.)

  26. SOLAR SCENARIOS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES Financing the Project • 50 kW System • Net cost: $200,000 • 20 year loan @ 5.75% (RAI) • 25 year lifetime • Net cash flow: $2,015/year x 20 years = -$40,300 • REPI: + $1,400/year x first 10 years = $14,000 • 5 years savings “free energy”: $12,527 x 5years = $62,635 • Net savings $36,335 over life of project • Plus local economic development benefit • Plus air quality benefits (eliminates 96,248 lbs. CO2 in first year!) • Plus increased reliability • IF rates go up, savings are greater • IF energy efficiency, savings are greater

  27. SOLAR SCENARIOS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES Financing the Project • 50 kW System • Net cost: $200,000 • 11 year loan @ 3% (CEC) • 25 year lifetime • Net cash flow: $5,915/year x 11 years = -$65,065 • REPI: + $1,400/year x first 10 years = $14,000 • 14 years savings “free energy”: $12,527 x 14 years = $175,378 • Net savings $124,313 over life of project • Plus local economic development benefit • Plus air quality benefits (eliminates 92,237 lbs. CO2 in first year!) • Plus increased reliability • IF rates go up, savings are greater • IF energy efficiency, savings are greater

  28. ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS • LGC’s Stimulating Public-sector Implementation of Renewable Energy (SPIRE) • Renewable Energy Assistance Packet • Case studies & municipal contacts • Sample Policies, Ordinances, Codes • Sample RFPs • Feasibility studies and design assistance through NREL • CEC’s Energy Partnership Program • Cost sharing program • Program pays first $10,000 in engineering fees • Provides low-interest loans for energy saving projects • Energy audits, feasibility studies, life-cycle cost analysis

  29. RECOMMENDATIONS 1.Leverage opportunities for low-interest financing and rebate incentives while they last. 2.Utilize free assistance programs. 3. Adopt PV- and wind-friendly ordinances. 4. Provide incentives for residential and commercial renewable energy systems(i.e .expedite permit processing, reduce permit fees). 5. Initiate city/county-sponsored PV program for residents and businesses.

  30. For More Information: Local Government Commission (916) 448-1198 pstoner@lgc.org www.lgc.org/spire

More Related