1 / 12

EPL: Employment Practices Liability or Enormous Potential for Loss?

EPL: Employment Practices Liability or Enormous Potential for Loss?. Gerald L. Maatman Jr. , Moderator Seyfarth Shaw Mark S. Dichter Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Cyrus Mehri Mehri, Malkin & Ross PLLC Paul J. Siegel Jackson Lewis LLP Steven M. Sprenger Sprenger & Lang.

louis
Télécharger la présentation

EPL: Employment Practices Liability or Enormous Potential for Loss?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EPL: Employment Practices Liability or Enormous Potential for Loss? Gerald L. Maatman Jr., Moderator Seyfarth Shaw Mark S. Dichter Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Cyrus Mehri Mehri, Malkin & Ross PLLC Paul J. Siegel Jackson Lewis LLP Steven M. Sprenger Sprenger & Lang

  2. New Wave of Employment-Related Class Actions June 4, 2007 Hamilton, Bermuda Hamilton, Bermuda ~ June 4 & 5, 2007

  3. Rule 23 Requirements • Big Group Of People • Common Claims And Issues • Named Plaintiff Presents “Typical” Claims • Named Plaintiff And Lawyers Will Adequately Represent The Class • Most Efficient Manner In Which To Decide Core Issues For A Big Group Of Plaintiffs

  4. Injunctions, Money Damages, and Attorneys’ Fees in Employment Discrimination Class Actions • Rule 23(b)(2) Injunctive Relief • Rule 23(b)(3) Monetary Relief • Fees Awarded to Class Counsel

  5. §216(b) Requirements Are Key In FLSA Collective Actions • Opt In / Opt Out • Lenient Two-Step Collective Action Certification Process

  6. Leading Rule 23 Settlements in Employment Discrimination Cases in 2006 • C.H. Robinson - $15 million • Los Alamos Labs - $12 million • Treasury Department - $9 million • N.Y. Convention Center - $8.4 million • Sprint - $5.5 million • Woodward Governor - $5 million

  7. Leading Class Action Settlements in FLSA Collective Actions in 2006 • Citigroup - $98 million • UBS - $89 million • Morgan Stanley - $42.5 million • 24 Hour Fitness - $38 million

  8. Key Rule 23 Rulings for Employment Discrimination Cases In 2006 • IPO – 2nd Circuit • J & J – New Jersey • Colindres – Texas • Reeb – 6th Circuit • Cargill – Minnesota • Costco – California • Boeing – Oklahoma

  9. Key § 216(b) Rulings For FLSA Cases In 2006 • Glewwe – New York • Himmelman – New Jersey • Carlson – Minnesota • Honojos – Nevada • Sepulveda – California • In Re Farmers – 9th Circuit

  10. Mega Employment Discrimination Settlements thus far in 2007 • $46 Million In Augst-Johnson, et al. v. Morgan Stanley (D.D.C. – April 24, 2007) • $55 Million In Satchell, et al. v. Federal Express (N.D. CA – April 12, 2007) • $57 Million In Williams, et al. v. Sprint (D. Kan. – May 18, 2007)

  11. Mega Wage & Hour Settlements Thus Far In 2007 • $87 Million In Cornn, et al. v. UPS (N.D. CA – April 16, 2007) • $65 Million In Rosenberg, et al. v. IBM (N.D. CA – January 3, 2007) • $53.3 Million In In Re Albertson’s (D. Idaho – March 22, 2007)

  12. Key 2007 Rulings • Dukes, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 274 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. Feb. 6, 2007)

More Related