290 likes | 429 Vues
Budget Study Session February 7, 2013. Michael E Finn. Discussion Points. Current Year M&O Summary Budget projections update Current tracking by function Fiscal Year 2014 Assumptions Options and Discussion on Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Reductions and budget collaboration summary
E N D
Budget Study Session February 7, 2013 Michael E Finn
Discussion Points • Current Year M&O Summary • Budget projections update • Current tracking by function • Fiscal Year 2014 Assumptions • Options and Discussion on Fiscal Year 2014 Budget • Reductions and budget collaboration summary • Revenue generating options
Desired Outcome from Study Session • Board direction on FY 2014 budget • Create capacity to cover the structural deficit and direct monies towards salary enhancements
Fiscal Year 2013 M&O Summary • Total spend projected to be $188.6M • Slightly lower than total spend last year • All areas tracking to plan
3-5 Year Plan • Developed in 2011 to provide a metered plan for reduction • Previous years held hope that reductions were temporary • Failure of Prop 204 • Plan recognized long term structural deficits as a result of • Continued fluctuations and reductions in funding • Uncontrollable increases in expenses such as ASRS, healthcare and utilities • Enrollment
Funding Planning Assumptions • ADM for funding purposes to increase 150 students • Overall funding per student to remain the same • 2% increase to Base Support Level will not be additional monies for FY 2014
Expense Planning Assumptions • Increases $2.15 M • ASRS to increase .4% or $400K • Healthcare to increase $1.0M • Utilities to increase $500K • Additional staffing to address K-2 prep time $250K
Classroom Site Fund (CSF or Prop 301) • CSF broken into 3 funds • Fund 11 • Represents 20 % of the total CSF funding and 100% goes towards salary enhancements for certified employees • Fund 12 • Represents 40% of the total CSF funding and 100% goes towards certified performance pay • District will continue to pay out in lump sum within 14 days of the end of the fiscal year • Fund 13 • Represents 40% of the total CSF funding and can be used for salary enhancements for certified employees or for “menu items” such as professional development • District will continue to use 100% towards salary enhancements for certified employees • JLBC will provide budget for 2014 in March
Reductions • Continue reductions in the 3-5 year plan • Collaboration Team overview and final rubric • Participation list • Red, yellow, green list • Process to band remaining green list • Verbal update on most recent Collaboration Team meeting • Association Advisory recommendations
Collaboration Team • 6 Certified Employees • 2 PEA, 2 CTA, 2 Non represented • 3 Principals • 3 PPA • 2 Secretaries • 1 High School, 1 Elementary • 6 Classified • 1 DAC, 1 IMT, 1 Maintenance, 2 PESP • Administrative Team • Full Council Team (Arts, HR, K-12, Curriculum, Procurement, CTE, IMT) • Business Services, Deputy Superintendent and CFO facilitated and responded to questions from group’s discussions
Association Advisory Membership • Barbara Barcus • Rae Conelley • Isabel Contreras • Dawn Kennedy • Millie Kerber • Mark Moffatt • Mary Schuett • Vance Setka
Red List • Increase Participation Fees • Increase Class Sizes • Four Day School Weeks • M&O Contributions to School Sites • Eliminate PE and Arts • DAC Closure • High School Closure • High School Course Reductions
Yellow List • Need to establish and adhere to standards • Reading Specialists • SIS Coordinators • Assistant Principals • Band
Green List • Close Elementary-$850K per school • Block Scheduling Adjustment-$3.0M • Relocate PTC-$500K • *Reduce Librarians to one per cluster $2.0M • *Reduce Nurses to one per cluster $1.5M • Restructure Pull out for Gifted-$1.0M • Reduce Elementary Guidance to one per cluster-$300K • Postage at HS-$250K • Transportation Efficiencies-$250K • Reductions at DAC-$300K * Part of Original Plan in 2009
Banding Process • All teams were asked to place items on the green list into one of three bands • (A) representing the items, in no particular order, that would be recommended as the items to meet the current structural deficit • (B) representing the items, in no particular order, that would create an additional level of capacity for salary enhancements or future structural deficits • (C) representing the items, in no particular order, that would create the final level of capacity for salary enhancements or future structural deficits
Reductions for FY 2014 • Continue 3-5 year reduction plan • Additional $1.7 million • Finalize part time custodial and centralized maintenance transition $500K • Relocate PTC $500K • Collaboration Team Feedback • Reduce District level administrative/support staff • Reduce postage expense by 50% • Transportation reductions
Revenue Generating Ideas • Develop in house special services programs to reduce tuition out • Civic center marketing • Gifts and donations • Selling of district property • Expand e-campus opportunities • Kinder Academy charges • Other fees