50 likes | 159 Vues
This discussion delves into Dr. Caroline Kay Picart's insights on Nietzsche's complex views toward art, women, and mythology. Through examining the concepts of the Apollinian and Dionysian, we explore how these dualities inform our understanding of both societal roles and individual identity. The dialogue extends to interpretations of cultural artifacts, like song clips and narratives such as "Peter Pan," questioning the interdependence of genders within Nietzsche’s framework and reflecting on the shifting dynamics in human relationships.
E N D
The-Pre Zarathustran Phase: Exca/Elevating the Mother Dr. Caroline Kay Picart Associate Professor of English Courtesy Associate Professor of Law Prepared by Kevin P. Harloff
Why would Dr. Picart use the picture below to describe Nietzche’s Duplicitat?
Apollinian or Dionysian? Or both? • What are your thoughts on this song clip? Is it Apollinian or Dionysian? Or is it both?
Art, Women, and Myth • Nietzsche can be viewed in different lights/darks in his view of women. • Human/All Too Human brings in the categories of the free-spirit vs. the fettered spirit. What is the difference between the two? • How dependent are women on men(according to Nietzsche)?
Peter Pan • How does this clip relate to Nietzsche? • How is Peter Pan an embodiment of the man (in society, myth, etc)? • How is Wendy an embodiment of the woman (in society, myth, etc)?